881
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by ShotDonkey@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new "king"

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it's an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tomatol@lemm.ee 59 points 18 hours ago

Very disappointing that this is the CEO and founder of Proton. I'll be moving my stuff elsewhere and deleting my account this week.

[-] simpliston@lemm.ee 5 points 13 hours ago

Where are you moving? I'm interested in alternatives to Proton Mail and Proton Drive

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 27 points 18 hours ago

Just canceled my subscription.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 38 points 17 hours ago

Yes I'm sure he'll crack down hard on all the tech companies that are giving him millions of dollars and kissing his feet...

What a moron.

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 47 points 18 hours ago

Sure, yeah, anti-big tech.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 70 points 20 hours ago

There is no ethical consumption under capitalism, and that applies to tech. I pay for Proton and this is disappointing af but not shocking. Corporations and wannabe billionaires always fold to fascism.

Gonna start looking around at alternative email services to consider but I use my Proton email everywhere, so switching away is going to suck.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] italics2@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

It's ridiculous how many people just go "oh well time to dump Proton" because of a picture (not even a link) of a tweet without context. Also the title is misleading. Andy Yen in this picture is complementing Trump, and also apperently posting facts about who started the antitrust actions. "Embracing" is, really, as I have written, misleading.

[-] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Position got backed up by an official proton account as a reaction to a shitstorm on Mastodon.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 104 points 21 hours ago

Let's not get carried away. The scope of the comment is pretty narrow if you read it closely. This is one member of a 5-person board that also includes Tim Berners-Lee. The foundation structure is also a protection against abuses.

[-] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 90 points 21 hours ago

Yes you are right, and no you are not. It is concerning and something to stay vigilent about in the upcoming times.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
[-] Ballissle@lemmy.zip 33 points 18 hours ago

Ffs. I just switched a ton of stuff over to proton. Hopefully this is an individuals view and not that of the company as a whole.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago

Nope, unfortunately. See official response posted above.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] 7112@lemmy.world 86 points 21 hours ago

Sad. The way tech companies are changing stripes, we are about to hit a surveillance state by summer

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Biden's pick Lina Khan deserves all the credit for aggressively prosecuting anti-competitive practices. However, Gina Slater looks like someone capable of continuing that work and a legitimate admirer of Lina Khan. Yes there are ties to Vance and the FTC office is likely to end up beholden to the egomaniac in chief. So the whole "little man" thing aside (that's baloney), that's one person that's not a shit stain out of all the shit stains in the incoming cabinet.

Look Lemmy, you're welcome to choose what you want in your life and what you don't. But being too rigid with letting stupid opinions of a project's founder cause you to reject everything, would have you miss the big-picture benefits of having such a project exist. If you look at this Lemmy development co-leader's opinions on transgenderism, are you going to stop using this software that lets you converse on an LGBTQ+ safe-space instance with no involvement on a social level from said developer/founder?

[-] archchan@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

transgenderism

At risk of going slightly off topic, trans people aren't an -ism. It's not an ideology, though transphobes love to frame it that way (not saying you are).

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah I was trying to summarize in a word how the linked comment used it, the developer was not talking badly of trans people per se, but was critical of how their group and the cause to express their identity is being misused by the ruling class. I imply that it could be transphobia, but I'm not certain if it is, even if I understand why it would be an upsetting and hurtful take for some. If there's a better way to describe this succinctly with a more respectful framing, I'm open to alternatives.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
881 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32741 readers
2643 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS