516
As opposed to signalling that you have none.
Mark Zuckerberg is a dork.
I quit Facebook and Instagram years ago, long before it was called Meta. Fuck that goon.
He whines, signalling his "virtues"
What Mark is really saying you will be back. if anyone is still on Facebook after all these years he is probably right. He also knows if anything that does take it out. He will just buy it up and once again those people will be back under meta's control. He has too much money. The only answer is to stop using identity based social media.
That's the beauty of the fediverse. It cannot be bought anymore than someone can buy "the internet".
load more comments
(5 replies)
lol
Eat turds Zuck
Suck my French-canadian balls Mark. Actually nevermind, just get fucked .
He'll zuck em
Someone needs to contraption this fucking guy asap
watson387 says Mark Zuckerberg can 'go fuck himself'.
Ah, so he admits that it is virtuous!
Well then I'm virtue signalling, fuckface. I deleted all the Meta platforms I used, save for my fake white supremacist Facebook account because I use that to tell the employers of Nazis that a Nazi works for them. I am done with my personal accounts though.
I never understood that phrase. If you admit there is virtue to your opponents actions isn't that just certifying you are wrong regardless of the opponents intentions?
No, it's saying they're doing something mostly superficial and useless because they think it will make people see them as virtuous, where they wouldn't have done it if it wasn't a highly visible act, not that the actions are actually virtuous. So like someone volunteers for one day for some charitable cause, but spends the whole time taking selfies and not actually helping much.
That said I'm not sure what the logic is that quitting facebook counts as this
Alright but the highly superficial act is seen as virtuous. The act we oppose when we use this phrase. That act. It is virtuous. Therefor we in this hypothetical stand against virtue and goodness.
It generally means that we don't believe they'd be taking that action if there weren't a camera rolling or trending hashtag to follow. It's not criticizing the actual action, but the context around the action.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Man, Zuck the cuck Fuckerberg is really virtue signalling saying something like that damn
Yes, now tell me the problem with that
I'm not sure if this headline meets the criteria for not the onion.
Yes, we are. You are still losing users.
You know, some people actually try to be good people.
Fuckerberg.
this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
516 points (100.0% liked)
Not The Onion
15808 readers
828 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS