159
submitted 1 month ago by Garibaldee@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago

Wouldn't it be wild if this led to Greenland actually becoming independent?

[-] runeko@programming.dev 20 points 1 month ago

Or Mexico, Canada and Greenland fighting over the territory that was formerly called the United States?

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago
[-] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 16 points 1 month ago

Hey now, buster. You’re not fit to rule yourself. Pick one or we’ll pick for you!

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Don't we all

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

While i get them, i dont know how they plan on sustaining themselves. If they want to be independant from countries they have to be dependant on something else which will most likely be the eu if thet join. Greenlands population is 50k, one of the smallest counties based on population, while its land area 2 million km² is the 12th largest country.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They don't need to till all that land, nor to stand a border guard every 50 meters. They are gonna sustain themselves just as they were previously. You don't think they were doing nothing and all the food etc. were delivered from Denmark?

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

A third of the revenue in greenland is the danish sending money to them. If they want to become independant it will be a lot of work. Cut their legal systems off of denmark, loose all the danish funding, loose the danish military and a lot less danish people will move there(because a lot of jobs need education that is simply not available in greenland). Also the only place that is properly connected to the rest of the world is nuuk with a population of 20 thousand. Im not saying its not possible just that iceland did it and they played on easy mode compared to greenland. By the way they are also in a bit of a problem because they rely on nato for their whole military and nato is pretty unreliable nowadays. And we are talking about a us(technically) invasion anyways so nato wouldnt help greenland. You just dont get how small the population of greenland is.

[-] sfera@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

You might have missed some points.

Prime Minister Mute Egede:

“Cooperation is about dialogue. Cooperation means that you will work towards solutions,” he said.

Trump earlier this week refused to rule out using military or economic force in order to bring Greenland under US control. Trump said last month that “ownership and control” of Greenland was an “absolute necessity” for the US, as it seeks to counter growing Russian and Chinese interest in the Arctic region.

[-] Mark_shirley@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Ok so become Russian by force bye

[-] Aqarius@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I swear, Putin owes some of you people rent.

[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Lol dude Russia can't even properly invade a country directly connected by land and with 1/3 the population. Lmao GTFO.

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
159 points (100.0% liked)

World News

33456 readers
303 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS