507

Tencent says it's not a Chinese military company and is willing to sue the US Department of Defense if it isn't removed from a blacklist (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 10 months ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 256 points 10 months ago

Here's a list of websites China bans:

Google
YouTube
Facebook
Yahoo
Wikipedia
Marxists Internet Archive
Reddit
Fandom
Netflix
Zoom
Blogspot
Bing
Instagram
WhatsApp
Twitch
Roblox
Steam Store
Steam Community
Spotify
Messenger
X
LinkedIn
Skype
Tumblr
Pinterest
SoundCloud
Signal Private Messenger
Dropbox
Pornhub
XVideos
Medium
Dailymotion
BBC
The New York Times
Vimeo
The Guardian
SlideShare
Discord
DeviantArt
The Washington Post
Nico Video
Archive.org (Internet Archive)
Bloomberg
Flickr
Wretch
HuffPost
The Wall Street Journal
DuckDuckGo
Scratch
Reuters
NBC News -TIME
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)
Bandcamp
Technorati
Archive of Our Own
Viber
South China Morning Post
Plurk
The Economist
ABC
Voice of America
Radio Free Asia
NBC
PBworks
The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times (Chinese edition)
HBO
WION
Hong Kong Free Press
Apple Daily
TikTok
ChatGPT
Rockstar Games
GitHub
Hugging Face
Flipkart
Zomato
Clubhouse
Swiggy
Truth Social
National Weather Service
Kanzhongguo (English)
Kanzhongguo (Chinese)
Microsoft Copilot
Telegram
Voice of America (Chinese)
Teacher Li Is Not Your Teacher (by a famous anti-CCP Twitter poster)

[-] coaxil@lemm.ee 45 points 10 months ago

National weather service???

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 39 points 10 months ago

(tin foil hat)

The government... They control the weather information... Satellites... Weather machines... Snorts cocaine we can't trust them we need to trust our eyes...

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

I'm sorry but you know too much. Come with me.

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 44 points 10 months ago

Basically any site that they don't have full control over/can't buy favor from and has the ability to spread info they dislike, even if it's something as simple as 2+2=4".

And if you're looking for someone outside of China to blame for their internet shield, Cisco was responsible for helping them set it up.

[-] wax@feddit.nu 10 points 10 months ago

And then Huawei allegedly stole Cisco's IP? Ah, the irony

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

Xhamster slides in undetected...

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

That's more freedom than Texas

[-] im_at_work_mom@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

.ml Intensifies

[-] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

I came into this thread just to downvote their lies.

[-] prole 10 points 10 months ago

Yeah didn't even get to number 7 on the list before hitting a Marxist resource. Uh oh...

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Uh ... why SCMP? Isn't that a party-friendly newspaper anyway?

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

SCMP is critical of China, but they do soften the blow

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

Fair point, but that means the ban should be coming from Department of Commerce, not the DoD.

Don't try to come up with bullshit excuses about espionage.

"We're banning these private-business Chinese websites because China bans our private-business websites and that's anti-competitive".

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 173 points 10 months ago

Of course it’s not a military company, it’s an espionage company.

[-] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 13 points 10 months ago

Next you'll tell me all those cheap Chinese routers would allow our very telecommunications infrastructure to be hacked unless we're using end-to-end encryption.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/12/27/chinese-hackers-telco-access-00196082

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 90 points 10 months ago

Every fucking Chinese company is required to be an arm of their government and provide them with any information they request. It's not even a question, they are an arm of the Chinese government. They can get fucked

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 92 points 10 months ago

Same goes for US companies.

Have we learned nothing from Snowden?

[-] prole 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah it is similar, but not the same (at least not yet).

China is a one-party state, and the government has control over private enterprise. If you are a Chinese company, the PRC ultimately has control of it, and that means the Chinese military has access to anything you have access to, if they want it.

This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

Edit: For people who think I mean "party" like US political parties: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-party_state#Current_one-party_states

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 33 points 10 months ago

This is on a different level than anything Snowden released.

Snowden released the fact that the major internet companies in the US literally have full time CIA staff and locked rooms with servers

Why is this on a different level? Is it because they're ASIANS?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

That Snowden releasing the facts and it being brought up in courts, state congress, and federal congress as well as national news all revolved around it being illegal in the USA.

In the PRC it's only illegal to talk about it.

[-] bilb@lem.monster 11 points 10 months ago

That Snowden releasing the facts and it being brought up in courts, state congress, and federal congress as well as national news all revolved around it being illegal in the USA.

Did it stop?

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

China is a one-party state

I wish you could realise how hilarious it is to read someone comparing the US and China on their number of political parties...

[-] prole 18 points 10 months ago

Oh? So you are saying that there are no functional difference between a federation of 50 states, each with individual (somewhat independent) local and state governments, and the authoritarian CCP?

When I say "China is a one-party state," I'm not referring to political parties as we would understand them in the US (Democrat/Republican). I am referring to the actual structure of the government.

You might want to maybe educate yourself on what a "one-party state" means in this context before trying to make snarky comments.

[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

You're right, I'm sorry, I really should educate myself about the US beyond the 40+ years of propaganda I've had to endure and the absolutely constant, never ending stream of shit across all media I'm the grateful recipient of, thanks to the Internet™. But honestly, I'm kinda scared I'd actually die if I came to visit.

Meanwhile, my experience with China over the last ten years or so has left me regularly wondering, in the grand scheme of things, what the fucking difference is. You both are absolutely insane, from where I live.

But yes, I was totally cherry picking your message. I don't disagree with you, to be clear. I'm just amused about your choice of epithet.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (17 replies)

[-] roadrunnerr@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Both countries are acting in their own interests. Simple as that.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago

Imagine if that meant in the people's best interest.

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago

Sues. Lawyers do discovery. Tencent refuses. Court fines Tencent in contempt, rules in favor of the government. Tencent tries to bribe Trump with something.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

I agree with the US DoD. The large Chinese corporations are owned by CCP members and former PLA officers. Contain them until the PRC implodes.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not to mention I'm pretty sure all of their Chinese office buildings are literally in Military owned and operated land.

It would be like Google HQ being in the middle of a US military base.

EDIT: Although I do admit adjacent the Googleplex building there is a Department of Defense building like 10 minutes drive, near the airfield, but it's probably there because NASA operates on the airfield.

[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 35 points 10 months ago

Oh my, the US military might have to change the name of the list to, "Foreign companies we're blacklisting for classified reasons". How terrible.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

Discovery process, you say?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago

Keep it a note that having them listed as a Chinese military company could let US put pressure against open source groups to not collaborate with them; very similar to how US forced Linux Foundation to kick off decade old russian collaborators.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's a bad mischaracterization. You cannot force someone to do something voluntarily . Torvald spoke in support of it. I'm sure many governments and groups using the Linux kernel and open source want Developers that are vetted. Or can be reasonably sure won't be forced to act maliciously under duress.

[-] tekato@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

It is not a mischaracterization though. Open source projects can be forced to stop accepting contributions from employees of sanctioned companies, which would include Tencent employees if sanctioned. Anyways, Tencent is not being sanctioned here, so I guess it doesn’t really matter.

Also, Linus was definitely forced to kick the Russian maintainers out by USA sanctions.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] cupcakezealot 13 points 10 months ago

almost as if it's never been about security but about sinophobia

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lol

I respect the Chinese people, their modern advancements in science and technology, their industry, their customs, and their rich history and culture.

I do not respect a hostile dictatorship that rules over them all, and if they were smart they would not, either.

load more comments (24 replies)

[-] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Cool, can we make the divest from American game studios now?

[-] Juigi@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Isn't every chinese company part of CCP

[-] Kerred@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

"all right Tencent, make a game where you play as Tank man defending the innocent at Tiannanmen Square please"

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

The DoD will pay its fines 500#s at a time.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025

507 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

77126 readers

1641 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws