601
submitted 2 years ago by Wander@yiffit.net to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Welcome, I'm the CEO of email!"

Really, it should be kept more like an overplatform or protocol like what the email is. Luckily, Lemmy has the roles of developers and content admins so separated and decentralized that it shouldn't become a corpo-danger from now on

[-] mashhitmyself@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

“Get the CEO of the Internet on the phone!”

[-] TwystedKynd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

My only concern is extremists making use of it to organize, spread misinformation, coordinate attacks, etc. and there's zero oversight. That's a serious concern that needs addressing, but I have no idea how.

[-] Spacemanspliff@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

Ban those communities from your instance. There's not going to ever be any way to prevent them starting their own, all you can do is defederate. There doesn't need to be any more.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ArtBear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

In the Fediverse there are no Zuckerbergs, Musks, Dorseys, Huffmans etc.

[-] hydra@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

There is ALWAYS the possibility to enshittify anything. Meta is trying to infiltrate Mastodon already.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] maplealmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

CEO proof is a good reason to describe why I want my podcasts to come via an RSS feed instead of depending on an all-in-one app. I've often said things about open gardens and interoperable services, but that preaches to the choir.

"CEO Proof" really sells it to a non technical user.

[-] anthoniix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

One day the lemmy could just go closed source and sell to a company.

[-] damipereira@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Even if they do, they would not be able to force instance owners to update to the closed version. And people would take over the last available open source version and fork it. Also, a closed and open source version could co-exist, since the api is open.

[-] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

If they went closed source that would mean they would have a similar situation to Emby. They went closed source after a time which gave rise to people forking the last public build and making Jellyfin which is an excellent alternative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Machefi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

CEO-proof sounds pretty, though there already exists the (perhaps broader) term “decentralised”.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Something can be decentralized and non-CEO-proof at the same time. Cryptocurrency and related technologies are decentralized, but the wealth and power imbalance between the "peasants" and the rich-get-richer "nobles (derogatory)" is massive (see: 3AC, Celsius, Terra/Luna, etc).

Compare that to the fediverse - if an instance gets spezzed up by some CEO-minded knobhead with bigger ideas than brains, that instance can be defederated. It would still be a great loss of content, but it is decentralized in such a way that one person can't take down the entire ecosystem.

P.s. "spez" is now a verb, it means "to have a passable product/service completely fucked up and its users turned against you because you wanted more money".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You’re posting this on lemmy.world. The owner of this instance, the biggest new instance, is literally building out a business of instance hosting. If this goes well, and his business grows, it will have chief executives.

You could also totally monetize hosting and build a business around that. There are already several private projects to build lemmy clients.

With federated sites you won’t have one CEO. If it takes off, we’ll have many CEOs. Trust me.

[-] twoshoes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I agree that the more accurate term is "board-proof" but I still think "CEO-proof" conveys the idea better to someone who is unaware of the way social media corpos work. The image of the shady CEO with his pinstripe suite and greased hair, lighting his big cigar with a wad of dollar bills is so strong in the cultural conciousness, that even my inlaws would switch to a federated plattform.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I've never thought of something being CEO-proof, but you're not wrong. Those CEO's did shit the bed in the most diarrhea way possible.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
601 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29157 readers
133 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS