540
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Danitos@reddthat.com 126 points 1 month ago

Don't assume Google et al. will ever consider enough people buy their subscription. There's never enough money for these people.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago

A company isn’t successful in hyper capitalism unless they are accelerating the growth of their profits every year. They have to sell more products to existing users, acquire new paid users, charge more for their existing products, or they’re considered unsuccessful. The model literally assumes a constant infinite exponential growth of the human race where success can only be achieved if every human alive is paying for every product offering possible, buying every upsell and microtransaction, freely giving their data to be sold so that more useless products can be created at minimum cost and sold at maximum price. But also hyper capitalism lobbies for less benefits, lower pay, etc. It inevitably collapses into neo-feudalism or just slavery

[-] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

The model literally assumes a constant infinite exponential growth

Cancer. Capitalism models cancer.

[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 89 points 1 month ago

Google asking me for €13 a month? Their empire is built upon selling user data. Fuckers should be paying us.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago

And if you're a content creator, you can opt in to allow your content to be used by AI... Without compensation. 🤡

[-] toynbee@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

At least that's opt-in, unlike them using your Wi-Fi SSID to fine tune their location settings. Not only was that opt-out but you had to change your router settings (either change your SSID, which isn't hard but shouldn't be required, or hide your network, which alienated guests when mobile data wasn't so ever present). I don't even know if there's still a (simple) way out.

But yes. The option you describe is clearly ridiculous.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] bokherif@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago

I was happy to pay for youtube as a service until they broke the shit out of their algorithms and started shoving ads to my face in premium. Did a chargeback and got my money back. Fuck these monkeys.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 34 points 1 month ago

Search is also completely broken on YouTube. It's become useless.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] i_am_tired_boss@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

That's a nice way to lose access to all Google products, including your email account.

[-] bokherif@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

So far so good. The fuckers at youtube support acknowledged serving ads to me even with my premium membership, so they can suck a big fat dick.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 50 points 1 month ago

I don't care that enhanced Bitrate is premium only. I do care that you still need to click "advanced resolution settings" to access this even for premium users on mobile.

[-] skizzles@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

And even if you select high resolution preferred in settings, they will absolutely serve that shit at a low resolution forcing you to manually select the resolution every damn time.

Yes YouTube my connection is absolutely fast enough to watch at the max resolution you can serve, don't pretend it's my connection to cover for your intentional bumping down in resolution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

„I don’t want to watch ads and I want everything to be free.”

My brother in christ, this is not how services work.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It wouldn't be so bad if the ads were reasonably placed.

Don't target people who come in from another domain or on the first viewed video. Pre- roll ads after that. Most importantly, ad breaks at creator-defined times only. Sick of ads coming in at arbitrary times in the middle of a sentence. That's the worst part of it, IMO.

Oh and a time limit on ads. That has to happen too.

Also could somebody tell all the streaming companies that they know what language I watch all my videos in and to stop giving me Spanish language ads? Like, I got no problem with other languages, I just really feel like you're wasting your advertisers money showing them to people who don't know a quesadilla from a carton of pickles.

[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I was fine with it back when it was just one ad that you could skip.

I was fine with it back when it was just two ads that you could skip.

I was fine with it back when it was just two ads, and you could skip one, and the other was 5 seconds long. 10 was a stretch, but I'm patient.

Without an adblocker, now it's playing an unskippable, 10+ seconds long ad at the start AND at the end. Some ads are as long as 20 seconds. If the video is long enough, it dares to abruptly play an ad right in the middle. You can't skip that one, either. We're back to television content-to-ad ratios - the exact thing I was happy to dump once there was enough content on YouTube. I was patient. That wasn't enough for them. They can suck a beehive.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Free-at-point-of-service is a common feature of amenities provided by countries with socialist economies.

But they only work when the economy is actively managed. If you're just pumping cash into a big banking machine and telling people to grab for it, you're not incentivizing any particular economic activity. You're just encouraging entrepreneurs to get particularly good at snatching money out of the air and elbowing one another in the face.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Line must go up

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago

People can’t afford yet another monthly bill.

It’s like walking in Trador Joes for snacks. Oh, hey, this is only $3! And look, this is only $5! Get to checkout: $130 please.

Seriously, that’s how this nickel and dime subscription crap works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They finally shut off my premium account in Argentina for $3 and now I’ve been blasted with ads so much it’s unbearable. Like 3 ads every 3 mins pretty much.

Maybe I can try again in another country but I’m pretty sure they’re wise to it and demand a card used be of the same country too.

It’s fine on my phone but on the tvs where I mostly consume it’s hell on earth!

God damn YouTube. Why do we like it so much.

[-] PixellatedDave@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I am seriously thinking of cobbling together a cheap pc just to plug into my TV to watch things like YouTube without the ads.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] krimson@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago
[-] toynbee@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

I see this recommendation all the time. It frustrates me. I'm in favor of blocking ads and modding clients and whatever it takes to optimize one's experience, but the majority - by far - of my YouTube experience takes place on my TV. I can't do much to control it (pihole and other DNS solutions don't work on YouTube since their ads are hosted in the same servers as their videos).

I could perform various modifications to the operating system of my TV, and trust me it's tempting for a lot of reasons, but it was a very expensive (by my standards) TV so I want to at least wait until the warranty expires until I start experimenting.

I could also use something hooked up to my TV and mod that, which is my favorite idea, but my wife likes the interface as it is. It's an LGTV with the ... Sigh ... "Magic" remote, which I absolutely hate, but I don't want to take it away from her. It seems like that interface, especially the "magic" cursor, would be hard to replicate. I'd prefer not to go through the tedium of having two different systems.

Especially because we also have a console hooked up and no solution I've found so far has provided a simple way of switching between HDMI sources without running a disgusting number of cables. I did recently order a new receiver, so hopefully that helps with the multiple origins issue.

Obviously this is very much a a first world problem, and I apologize for my privilege, I just wanted to point out that uBO (or other software based solutions) aren't always the solution.

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

If your wife wants her familiar interface with ads, then she made the choice that you're watching ads on YouTube on your TV.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] MangoPenguin 26 points 1 month ago

That actually makes more sense to me compared to most premium features. Higher quality directly costs more money to stream.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

As with most things in the modern world that have gone to shit. It is not the monetization scheme in of itself that is the issue. It is the never ending desire for more profit this quarter than last forever.

If it was acceptable to stop trying to make even more once the cost to operate is covered and some healthy profit is made predictably then a lot less people would have issues. And enshitification would slow down.

[-] umbraroze@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

YouTube already randomly drops me to 360p on my big-ass broadband sometimes because it just feels like it. What are the guarantees YouTube Premium won't do that? ANSWER ME YOUTUBE, THIS IS CRUCIAL PRE-PURCHASE INFORMATION.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] kevincox@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago

The worst part is that this doesn't seem to be some sort of better quality. All of the other qualities seem to have tanked in the past year, so at best this just restores the previous 1080p bitrate.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 19 points 1 month ago

13 per month. That's over 100 per year. Did not expect it to be that expensive.

[-] Pechente@feddit.org 22 points 1 month ago

It is because it includes YouTube Music. A really crappy Spotify clone that nobody asked for.

[-] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 22 points 1 month ago

Which replaced Google Play Music, which was actually good.

[-] Pechente@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

Yeah that I think is the most upsetting part to me. Replace a perfectly fine product with a half baked one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] synapse1278@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

The 1080p non-premium looks like shit, not better than 720p. I think they reduced the Bitrate a lot and premium restors the original Bitrate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

YouTube premium is one of the subscriptions I most often feel thankful for having. I watch enough YouTube videos that avoiding all those ads is really worthwhile, I hope that my view is worth more to the channels I watch, and YouTube music let me cancel Spotify.

I understand being pissed at YouTube and Google, but at the end of the day, of all the things I have to rage at, YouTube isn't worth it. I like it, there are creators that use it that I like, and I understand that it costs real money to run the platform.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

wow, premium in the usa is expensive. it's a little under $3 per month here in india for the family plan and even that's after a recent 16% hike. the individual plan is even cheaper.

i guess these rates are in store for us as well in the future?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 13 points 1 month ago

Is that why I am getting about one ad for every 90 seconds of video ?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] subiacOSB@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

I was paying for it until it got to like $16.99 on iOS. As much of an annoyance to use a work around like AD Guard. I can now afford it but refuse to give those greedy mofos a dime.

[-] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 month ago

That is because you are paying for the premium of signing up through ios; apple takes a cut so to make money they raise the rates. It's extremely common signing up to any service through ios, that you will be charged higher than if you went to the website on your browser and sign up for it there. First link has link to Hank Green who does a great break down and investigation but provided many more examples.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/28/24166546/subscribing-to-stuff-from-your-iphone-is-a-waste-of-money

https://www.devicemag.com/youtube-premium-cost-iphone/

https://lifehacker.com/dont-sign-up-for-subscriptions-in-the-app-1850298355

https://www.forbes.com/sites/shaharziv/2020/07/08/heres-why-your-apple-app-store-purchases-may-be-a-ripoff/

https://umatechnology.org/psa-subscriptions-cost-more-when-bought-on-an-iphone/

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 1 month ago

yt-dlp and VLC still work. I'm good.

[-] jg1i@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

More than you think, actually. My wife recently signed up. I'm like, Babe! I already have uBlock Origin to block ads on desktop! On mobile, Firefox also blocks ads and allows listening to videos with the screen off. 😫

But, we still get ads on our smart LG TV. So. That's apparently enough to throw the money away.

[-] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 17 points 1 month ago

It's okay to pay for a service that you use daily.

I don't, but I disagree it's "to throw money away".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] rocky1138@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

I pay for premium but would love to use peertube instead since it's decentralized. It would be great to have all the people I sub to upload there as well then I'd bail.

[-] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I never noticed a quality difference on my phone due to the small screen, even 1080p to 720p wasn't bad on my 4k TV. Also, when did they change the free trial from three months to one?

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

when did they change the free trial from three months to one?

When they decided FUCK YOU!!! PAY US MONEY FASTER!!!

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Enhanced" bitrate? I've heard of high bitrates, and I've heard of low bit rates, but I ain't never heard of no enhanced bitrates. Does Google know something we don't, or do they think we're suckers? (Rhetorical question, don't answer.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

I can do all of them already without premium.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
540 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

36389 readers
1064 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS