328
submitted 1 month ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] protist@mander.xyz 241 points 1 month ago

YouTube says the policy will combat “egregious” clickbait that misleads viewers, with a particular focus on videos related to “breaking news” or “current events.” The company’s examples of egregious clickbait include a video with the title “the president resigned!” that doesn’t actually address a resignation or a “top political news” thumbnail attached to a video with no news content.

This is only going to target garbage-level content. You can still expect the same clickbait-style titles and thumbnails from established creators

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 102 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

YouTube will never "crack down" on these guys. They are their money-makes and can do whatever the fuck the want. Clickbait on huge channels is YouTube's bread and butter, even if people just click to comment that the creator sucks, that's still engagement and means there is more money in the ad bids.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 month ago

YouTube is the one pushing them to clickbait. Their metrics are designed such that if you don't bait clicks a huge percentage of the time you're shown, you won't even show up in the feeds of your actual subscribers.

[-] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I think you've correctly identified their self-interest over altruism, but you've misidentified the internal value of discouraging clickbait. YouTube is a treasure trove for building training datasets, and its value increases when metadata like thumbnails, descriptions, titles, and tags can be trusted.

It's the AI gold rush; notice how this coincides with options to limit or disable third-party training but not first-party training? It coincides but is definitely not a coincidence.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

I'll be even more cynical than that: I think this policy will be abused to suppress legitimate news/current events videos with a POV the oligarchs doesn't approve of (e.g. pro-Palestinian, pro-Adjuster, etc.).

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

Yes, which YT actively encourages people to do. So ultimately nothing really changes.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

This will address extreme and obvious falsehoods but I still encounter clickbait of the more pedestrian kind everywhere I go. “You’re using your table saw WRONG” or “the 1 table saw trick 99% of people don’t know” etc.

I consider this clickbait: it creates a false sense of urgency and doesn’t convey any information in itself. What is this one trick? Oh I already knew that one, but I had to watch the video to realize that.

It wastes a lot of time and makes things harder to search for. And often these clickbait headlines are not in the video headline where YT can easily scan them, but in the thumbnail graphic in huge letters, where it’s probably harder to automate any moderation for.

I pay for YT premium but this aspect of the experience still feels ad-like and cheap.

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 149 points 1 month ago

The fix was there, but they removed it. The dislike button. Fucking unbelievable how stupid these companies are.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

The fix was there, but they removed it.

Return YouTube Dislikes still exists. The likes and dislikes of RYD users are stored in an external database, so Google cannot take them away.

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Unless YouTube is using that data to not recommend crappy videos, then it's completely pointless. If YouTube was going to use that data, then they would, oh, I don't know, maybe still have a dislike button?

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Unless YouTube is using that data to not recommend crappy videos, then it’s completely pointless.

YouTube never did that anyway. YouTube recommends videos on user engagement. Thumb buttons in any direction are engagement. They have slightly hidden "don't recommend video/channel" options for that.

What RYD does is to show what others think.

[-] Gormadt 4 points 1 month ago

The fact they never used that data in video recommendations is surprising, and if they started to factor it in would have probably helped make this less of an issue

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The fact they never used that data in video recommendations is surprising

So you never clicked dislike, just to get recommendations for the same channel / type of video over and over again? I thought everyone figured that out by now. These are the menu items that actually do the trick:

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

It's completely inaccurate though. It can show massive amounts of faux dislikes that don't actually exist. This has been confirmed with youtubers, who still see the dislike ratio on their backend.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It’s completely inaccurate though. It can show massive amounts of faux dislikes that don’t actually exist. This has been confirmed with youtubers, who still see the dislike ratio on their backend.

I'd say the "actual" dislike numbers are completely inaccurate because what's the point of disliking a video in an environment where the dislikes don't count?

RYD extrapolates the like/dislike ratio as stored on their own server to the like numbers as displayed by YouTube. That's not secret information. They spell it out in their FAQ.

If anything, if you like more representative numbers, get more people to install RYD.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

So a video getting like 80% dislikes in the addon, but like 90% likes in the backend, is an okay and totally not misleading metric to you? And I uninstalled the addon because of this.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

When the only people hitting the dislike button are the people using the addon (because that's the only circumstance in which it counts), WTF else did you expect than for the dislike ratio with the addon to be higher?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] penquin@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

This is not official and not many people (relatively speaking) know about it. My wife, for example, still uses the official YouTube app on her iPhone with all of its ads and garbage.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 122 points 1 month ago

So, they created an algorithm that will only reward clickbait and completely ignore honest titles and thumbnails, then complain about their platform being one giant clickbait? Huh...

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 120 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Or, you can bring back the dislike button and stop promoting videos with high dislike ratios.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago

Do comments first. There's so much spam that almost looks legit because of how many upvotes they have.

[-] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

And actual scams with 300+ upvotes. Not just copied comments that get edited layer, but entire chains directing people to whatsapp numbers.

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

I am not referring to a like to dislike ration, I am referring to a dislike to view ratio. YouTube should bury those from recommendations.

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago

And maybe stop making comments help the video get more popular

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago
[-] Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca 61 points 1 month ago

Better title: “YouTube is cracking down on click bait - here’s how”

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"5 ways YouTube is cracking down on clickbait – #3 will make you shid and fard and cum your pants"

[-] Lanusensei87@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

YouTube tried to crack down on clickbait, what happened next will shock you!

[-] rigatti@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Thumbnail:

They're doing WHAT!?! --->

(⓿_⓿)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] konomikitten 60 points 1 month ago

YouTube is clickbait. This is like them saying they're going to crack down on their own advertising model.

[-] dan@upvote.au 60 points 1 month ago

Shout out to DeArrow, from the same developer as SponsorBlock. It replaces video titles and thumbnails with community-provided non-clickbait versions. Available as a browser extension, and is also built-in to several third-party YouTube apps, such as SmartTube.

[-] dax@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

I feel a bit conflicted about that, do I want that extension to hide the terrible clickbaity titles and thumbnails? For me that's a good reason to not watch these videos in the first place

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago
[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They either look like they need to shit or are eating an invisible popsicle

[-] 7rokhym@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

YouTube ruined Christmas. I can't stand my relatives anymore, they watch every conspiracy clip and now they are a thousand miles down the rabbit hole and I can't handle them for more than a few days a year. I hate evil Google or alphabet, or whatever they call themselves.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Smells like PR copy parading as news, what click bait was actually removed vs what they said they would? What's the criteria to qualify as click bait?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 11 points 1 month ago

What the hell is wrong with the people here? Actual positive news for a while and what does Lemmy have to say? Complaining and cynicism. No wonder you're so miserable all the time.

[-] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 month ago

For years, every update YouTube has had has made the platform worse. I think its valid to doubt this will improve anything. That being said, I agree with you. Lemmy as a whole needs to calm down a bit and stop being so damn negative about everything.

[-] LiamTheBox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Bait homosapien do not engage

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

Like, we will be able to make negative feedback about a video again? Oh no nevermind it's just bs again...

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

*Only directly misleading clickbait. So they'll continue to promote other forms of clickbait like specific thumbnails or capitalized & ambiguous titles.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] iopq@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Sure, as soon as X cracks down on misinformation

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

About time. This stuff has been cancer on YouTube for years.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Misleading titles and thumbnails are against YouTube terms of service for as long as I can remember. Those are options to select when reporting videos.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

What? Most likely in favor of more profitable clickbait.

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I won't be happy until they ban shocked Pikachu "show us your O face" thumbnails.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I logged off and then started looking for titties....the tape project, dancers wearing next to nothing, African tribe dancing naked, body paint, see thru lingerie hauls, cleaning naked hauls, breast feeding tities....my YouTube is now embarrassing pornographical without me loving in.

YouTube is not for kids.

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

How else are people at religious colleges with internet filters supposed to masturbate?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
328 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61774 readers
3496 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS