175

It's discrediting valid concerns against card-payments. It's invalidating how great cash is.

It's when the worst person you know makes a good point.

And things now are so Culture-Wars-y, nobody makes solid analyses any more, that when the far-right say cards are bad, everybody jumps to thinking cards are good.

(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't see how conspiracy theories would discredit cash over card. They often cite the same reasons any other anti-card payment people have. They just have weird reasons to need those features. If they're paranoid about being "got" by "them," they're usually into the private nature of cash and all that goes along with it, same as any other privacy concerned person.

They certainly don't hurt it as much as drug dealers and money launderers.

[-] thecam@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

An very new alternative to cash are Goldbacks. Cash made of gold, designed to be inflation proof cash.

!goldback@lemmy.world

[-] kspatlas@artemis.camp 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't this basically just a gold standard?

[-] thecam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It is spendable fractional gold. 1oz of gold is thousands of dollars right now. This breaks gold down for smaller transactions.

[-] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Privacy matters the most to people who have something material to lose with it, this unfortunately for pr reasons (but fortunately for many other reasons) includes bigots

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

We need to stop making privacy and free speech political

[-] kglitch@kglitch.social 3 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, this time next week they'll be on to the next thing to be angry and afraid about.

[-] Gargari@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Cash is bad, but better than CBDC

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Remember, ABC:

Always Carry Cash

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Covid made this really hard and somewhat political. A lot of businesses stopped taking cash. Some still don't take cash. Covid was never spread much in surfaces but I wasn't trying to argue and look like some whack job antivax person.

[-] gamey@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Austrian citizen here and idk if he would qualify as far right in the US but our current president is one of them!

[-] publictech@baraza.africa 1 points 1 year ago

Are there reasonably okay options to paying digitally without the surveillance part (or at least less of it as compared to credit cards?) Blockchain is a nonstarter due to the practical limitations in sustaining proof of work and stake.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

No. You can’t have privacy and also a ledger required to prevent money laundering and other scams.

[-] 9krpm@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

who cares? share good privacy preserving tips. don't agree? do you and see if it works out.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
175 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31628 readers
209 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS