78
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago

Ummmm......Baldur's Gate 3, anyone? How about Dragon Age: Veilguard? Those are just off the top of my head.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 15 points 7 months ago

Don't forget that everyone has a hard-on for Witcher 4.

[-] Nikls94@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Dude my GPU is so hard for Witcher 4 the fans started to hum "the bad touch" ever since the trailer ran!

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Except for those neets complaining that Ciri isn't "hot" for some reason.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago

There are always gonna be complainers. Like, I'm not super happy that Ciri seems to have undergone many plastic surgeries in a world without plastic surgery (but hey, maybe she popped into our world!), but it is what it is. Hopefully they at least contacted the original actress, otherwise I'm gonna be pissed at them, but if she said no, not much you can do.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

Idk, they literally have magic.

[-] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago

BG3, yes. Massive success.

Veilguard is a massive flop. It sold a lot compared to other games, sure, but based on the amount of money they spent and time in development, that was a shit investment. They were expecting like 10m sales, doing 1.5 instead according to whistleblowers.

[-] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 7 months ago

Yeeah.. this sounds the usual "Why, why aren't these games selling?" fans screaming, explaining what's wrong, begging "Guess this kind of games just don't sell"

[-] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Dragon age isn't a particularly good example. It was a massive flop.

Why are you citing mechanically rich games that happen to have a story?

[-] cobysev@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

That's a shame. "Narrative-driven, story-rich games" are mostly all I play. Just because people spend more time in strategy or MOBA games doesn't mean they're more popular, just that they take more time and don't have a designated end point, so people come back to play more often. But we still enjoy story-rich games and they'll still sell.

This is why Call of Duty has turned to garbage. Because they realized they could get more gameplay out of the multiplayer mode, so they stopped making good campaign modes and focused all their energy on multiplayer and pushing microtransactions. It's literally prioritizing money over quality gaming.

And I know, they're a business and the goal is to make money, but who can remember a fun multiplayer level? What even is the point in getting invested long-term in multiplayer when they're releasing a new game every 1-2 years? Counter-Strike has been mostly the same for decades and was extremely popular because it was so well-known and hardly changed. It only recently released a sequel, which was basically just a huge patch to the original game. Meanwhile, my memory of Call of Duty multiplayer games is fuzzy because I've played so many over the years and none really stand out to me.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Are they publicly traded? Being publicly traded is just the death of game companies, some decisions have to be based on more than profit.

They also have a really good universe in Frostpunk they could explore through other game-styles.

[-] Evrala@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In the article they do post about "investor concerns"

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 16 points 7 months ago

You can’t sell endless in-game micro transactions in a single player game. Gotta get to work on League of Fortnight: Apex of Duty

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

Disco Elysium refutes this take.

[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

Aren't they 99% of AAA games?

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, it's because frost punk 2 sucked on every level. People are screaming for narrative driven story Rich games, and what you provided was a bare minimum politics simulator with a minor aspect of City build survival with very little story, and a extremely difficult game to actually balance

And all of this is disregarding the fact that frostpunk one was already fairly steep in price for what you got, and then frostpunk 2 released at and even higher price for even less game.

This is them seeing their failure that is frostpunk 2 and not being able to build on any of the constructive feedback that they've gotten from any of their bad reviews, and saying oh well we can't be the problem people must not like story anymore.

this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
78 points (100.0% liked)

Games

20734 readers
819 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS