433

e-mail in the AI era (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 9 months ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mastodon.

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[+] LostXOR@fedia.io 46 points 9 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

[deleted]

[-] exasperation@lemm.ee 21 points 9 months ago

I was gonna eat that steak anyway, whether I send zero or 100 emails today.

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 9 months ago

well it's still like 1,800+ gallons of water for a single pound of prepared cow flesh, so..

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

this is probably not true

[-] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago

Man the level of triggered I got while reading this really makes me question if I am a bad person, but I can imagine that in this age of corporate sponsored propaganda that some corporations benefit (Monsanto) from veganism. These comments have the opposite effect, such an absurd statistic without any point of reference or comparison is meaningless except to those who wouldn't question it either way. Shame-spreading won't solve the climate or world hunger

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 9 months ago

wow, you brought a lot of your own stuff to my comment.

[-] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

It doesn't seem like their point was to trigger? Unless you're triggered by the word flesh?

I'm not a vegan/vegetarian. But I recognize from a purely thermodynamics perspective that meat is less efficient than a plant based diet. They're efficiency losses for feeding plants to another organism instead of just eating those plants directly.

Before agriculture, meat was basically required for humans. Let wild animals consume inedible plants and then hunt using very little of your own resources. Now that equation has been inverted since we control the entire chain of resources.

You can be mindful of environmental issues and efficiency without taking a moral stance on meat eating. There's really no easy answer, it's very complex. Pollution, water use, land use, pesticides, nutrition, etc are all factors.

[-] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 10 points 9 months ago

gallon of water

Am... Am I not supposed to be drinking water now?

[-] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

I hate how people are trying to shame me for generating some funny pictures when they commute to the office in a gas guzzler for only doing online meetings.

Unless it’s okay we start shaming them too every time we get the chance :p

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 6 points 9 months ago

It does absolutely nothing, and is simply a dog whistle.

[-] John@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago

May we should instead add some prompts to our signature like "Please answer the E-Mail like Donald Trump would" this would make no Impact to the environments but may would lead to some funny responses.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024

433 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

8229 readers

466 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works