33
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by spaduf@slrpnk.net to c/mensliberation@lemmy.ca

Though I don't think this terminology is used, this article is primarily about heteropessimism and it's effects on relationships from both sides.

all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] valentinesmith 21 points 1 year ago

that patriarchy might ostensibly benefit men – even while poisoning them in a myriad of ways – but it is upheld by all genders, particularly within spaces like romantic partnership

With this quote I was reminded of many retellings of men in hetero relationship who still vividly remembered hurtful moments of being shamed when opening up and being vulnerable.

As the article states I would argue it’s wrong to assume that just one gender is at fault for the status quo, but that it is maintained by multiple actors.

And yes I’ve seen a lot of heteropessimism online and even partially irl but I think it’s breeding ground are „taking things for granted“ and just assuming what partners would like or want in relationships. Needs can be so diverse and deeply personal that I’d argue while there is possibility to feel safe in following a relationship script we have to dare to explore each other in our uniqueness and thereby also share ourselves authentically and that’s a forever journey.

Thank you for the nice read spaduf! (by the way is that a pun on the pokemon or am I nerding out?)

[-] spaduf@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

heteropessimism online and even partially irl but I think it’s breeding ground are „taking things for granted“ and just assuming what partners would like or want in relationships

I think a big part of this too is how these things originate through external gendered expectations (as in external to the relationship). A lot of the issues that inspire heteropessimism largely come from the older generation which very intensely internalized not only those gendered expectations but this idea that those external expectations are universal enough to supersede even a very basic conversation with their partner.

by the way is that a pun on the pokemon or am I nerding out?

Lol no just a fun short word that usually isn't taken as a username.

[-] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

As someone who was in an emotionally abusive relationship, I don't think I can read this without getting triggered.

I think it's important to remember that all women are capable of being victims and perpetrators, and all men are also capable. Abusers have no genders and can occur in non-cis relationships.

[-] spaduf@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I understand this, I've definitely been meaning to post a discussion about how we should go about things like content warnings here.

EDIT: Just to be clear for anybody who may be worried from this exchange. This article is generally not about abuse in relationships.

[-] Phoenixbouncing@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

A really nice article, but one I feel needs to go a step further.

From experience, and outside really abusive relationships, if a relationship fails there's always blame enough for both parties. I takes two to mess up a tango.

It's worrying that social media is pushing these black and white narratives rather than helping growth.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
33 points (100.0% liked)

Men's Liberation

1863 readers
3 users here now

This community is first and foremost a feminist community for men and masc people, but it is also a place to talk about men’s issues with a particular focus on intersectionality.


Rules

Everybody is welcome, but this is primarily a space for men and masc people


Non-masculine perspectives are incredibly important in making sure that the lived experiences of others are present in discussions on masculinity, but please remember that this is a space to discuss issues pertaining to men and masc individuals. Be kind, open-minded, and take care that you aren't talking over men expressing their own lived experiences.



Be productive


Be proactive in forming a productive discussion. Constructive criticism of our community is fine, but if you mainly criticize feminism or other people's efforts to solve gender issues, your post/comment will be removed.

Keep the following guidelines in mind when posting:

  • Build upon the OP
  • Discuss concepts rather than semantics
  • No low effort comments
  • No personal attacks


Assume good faith


Do not call other submitters' personal experiences into question.



No bigotry


Slurs, hate speech, and negative stereotyping towards marginalized groups will not be tolerated.



No brigading


Do not participate if you have been linked to this discussion from elsewhere. Similarly, links to elsewhere on the threadiverse must promote constructive discussion of men’s issues.



Recommended Reading

Related Communities

!feminism@beehaw.org
!askmen@lemmy.world
!mensmentalhealth@lemmy.world


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS