551
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The world’s top chess federation has ruled that transgender women cannot compete in its official events for females until an assessment of gender change is made by its officials.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zapdrive@lemmy.world 135 points 1 year ago

Lol, literally the only game where physical size, bone density, lung capacity and muscle strength does not matter is keeping men and women separate! Haha... In chess there should be no separate category for women, unless.... Unless.... Unless we believe that women are less smarter than men.

[-] UlrikHD@programming.dev 90 points 1 year ago

Chess got an open class and a female class. The latter is there to provide a safer environment for girls and hopefully encourage more to try out the sport.

[-] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do girls need a safe environment when playing with boys?

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 year ago

Because as we've proven times and times again when in presence of women, we're a bunch of morons that can't treat them with the respect they deserve.

[-] UlrikHD@programming.dev 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Men can be nasty and intimidating towards women as history have shown a million times. Add in the fact you have a lot of "old fashioned" men in the sport that may not be up to date on how you should behave in the third millennium. If you want to grow the sport, you need to facilitate a safe and welcoming environment for everyone. Tournaments exclusive to girls is one way build towards that.

[-] wildwhitehorses@aussie.zone 20 points 1 year ago

This is the first comment that made me understand why separate competitions are requires. Thank you.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 86 points 1 year ago

And they also made it so trans men have to give up any women's titles they've earned. So, they simultaneously think trans men are men, but trans women are not women.

If anything, based on the past comments of the head of the organization, they have a position that's generally "women are dumber than men and we want to make decisions that align with that ethos always".

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 35 points 1 year ago

I've stopped being surprised by chess dorks after it came out that America's Champion, Bobby Fischer, our Hope Against The Commie Gameplaying Menace was literally a neo-Nazi and not subtle about it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be clear, the head of FIDE is this guy with close ties to the Russian fascist state.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

None of y'all are getting it. Trans women have an unfair advantage in chess because they can turn the king into another queen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Almostarctic@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

I'm still wondering why there is even gender based play in Chess.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] aluminiumsandworm@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago

this makes sense because cis women have such small bones they can't reach past the centre board, giving most trans women and tall cis women an inherent advantage. /s

what the fuck chess this is just blatant transphobia

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

This is such a stupid argument, while you might be able to make the argument about sexual dimorphism in physical sports there's literally no good reason why a woman shouldn't be allowed to play chess against a man, or play chess against another woman if they are trans.

Chess is a game based on intelligence and strategy, it's not based on strength. It seems that this decision was made primarily on the basis of sexism, either because they think that chess is ""manly"" or because they think that men are smarter than women or that women are stupid. Either way not logical, purely sexist.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Wahots@pawb.social 51 points 1 year ago

Ugh, why do they feel the need to even write these rules in the first place? I can almost guarantee you there's like, five trans people who are even registered to play chess. Why go to so much effort to block such a fraction of a percent of people anyways?

Whenever I read articles like these, I substitute "trans" for a different minority, such as a racial or ethnic minority, and it really puts it in perspective.

I remember when Utah made a huge deal about it in women's sports. And someone like the Utah governor was against it, saying he'd never seen so much hate around something so little. He told his colleagues that in the entire state, only four trans youth were even playing registered sports, and most were JV, not even going to competitions. It's sad to see people so stoked by hate for something so...mundane. :/

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

The same people claiming transwomen would ruin women's sports were celebrating when the U.S. women's team lost the World Cup.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] chk232@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's a issue in chess. Unless they have to run 100m while holding the chess board.

[-] starlinguk@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago

They consider trans women men, and men are smarter than women. That's what it implies anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Why are men and woman separated in chess??

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Men and women aren't separated, at least not usually. Its a woman's category and an open (everyone) category. Is almost completely opposite of sexist, gives women more opportunities to succeed.

Edit: link to a larger discussion on this topic

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/why-are-there-only-few-female-chess-players-at-the-top-level

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot 40 points 1 year ago

Today we learned that bigots think trans women have a biological advantage at being smarter and more logical than cis women.

Last month we learned that bigots think trans women are hotter than cis women.

Starting to think bigots don't think clearly.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

well this just doesn't even make any fucking sense at all

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Clarifications and comments (some pre emptive)

Chess has a women's category to boost participation and spotlight female players.

Women can and do compete in the open category, which allows men and women. However, currently the highest rated women perform under the super closed "Super GM" level, so they participate in the tournaments that are less prestigious but fitting their rating. Male players like IM Eric Rosen also participate in such tournaments.

The best female player in history , Judit Polgar was 8th best in the world when taking both genders into account. There's nothing stopping women from reaching the elite level in open chess. She even participated in the candidates tournament which decides who gets to play against the world champion for the world champion title. Unfortunately she didn't perform too well, but it's not because of her gender, she was basically beaten 2-1 (plus draws) by a male competitor, just like the other contestants in the round she was eliminated.

At her peak she had 2735 Elo points, making her 55th highest rated person in the history of organized chess. This is higher than one of the actual challengers to the crown, Nigel short.

Regarding the rulings:

  1. No one is going to pretend to be a woman, in order to convert the person's identity with fide, they are required to have government issued paperwork saying they have transitioned. It's not worth it.

  2. it's funny that male to female transgender people are not regarded as women by this ruling, hence cannot participate in women's events, but female to male transgender people also forfeit their women's titles as they are not seen as women either. (To be fair, they can convert them to open titles, and get them back if they detransition officially)

So according to FIDE, transitioning from a man to a woman doesn't make you a woman, you are considered a man, but also, transitioning from a woman to a man makes you a man, so you are also not considered a woman.

Seems paradoxical. You'd think they'd pick one and stick to it.

Also: chess does have physical advantages, but they seem to be reletive and not competitive. Most high level players have some sports regimen as it helps increase cardiovascular efficiency, but size of competitor doesn't seem to matter as seen by David Bronstein and Mikhail Tal. Ian Nepomniatchschi intentionally lost weight for the world championship, and his ratings grew as a result.

Remember that whales are not necessarily more clever than humans even though their brains are huge in comparison.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Hairyblue@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

What? Is this real? Are the men and women not competing together? It is not a physical competition. Why the separation?

[-] wwaxen@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Currently, the top women don't come close to the top men. Considering how few female chess players are in comparison, it's not a surprise.

Having a women's league means you can have chess news about women's tournaments and champs and give them some visibility.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

The reason there's a women's league in the first place is so they don't get harassed by the men (ostensibly).

So while on the surface, a gendered League is stupid, there are real world reasons for the separation.

This decision might / maybe / could be an extension of that reasoning. But very likely it's not, and it's just more bullshit anti trans policy.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Plenty of enlightened gents hitting the thread here to rubbish the need for a women's category whilst simultaneously demonstrating the need for a women's category

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Why is chess even seperated by gender? Its a completely non physical.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] shapis@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

Being a minority in any social setting brings difficulties that others just don't otherwise face.

Having a women's category for chess is a way of creating a safe environment for everyone to thrive.

[-] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, wait, why the hell is there a separate women's category in fucking chess in the first place? Those in charge of this decision are 100% misogynists AND transphobes. There isn't a single good reason for this.

[-] hh93@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

For the same reason why we need quotas for businesses

Having a role model is hugely important for people picking up something.

If some girl plays chess and looks at the professional players and big tournaments there are no women there. So she likely will not pursue that path professionally. If there is a women's league then there the guarantee that there will be visibility for the winners which then creates more idols for young people and over the years increases the level of play until they are equal enough.

Not to mention the chess-clubs favouring boys on their training since they have a bigger chance to make it big and shine a spotlight on that club that produced this talent. With female only tournaments it's easier to create a name for yourself if you treat both genders equal and create the same talent for both sides there are so many fewer players.

Sure sounds dumb on paper but it's actually really necessary in order to create a pathway to more professional female players

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Minorities like trans people? A place where everyone can thrive?

It's fucking chess. I understand men may have more typical interest, but there shouldn't be divisions based on sex or gender. Maybe divisions for some neurodivergent people, but I'd bet on many of the great chess players being neurodivergent in some way.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] artvandelay@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Of all the sports where someone's biological sex would matter, chess is not one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
551 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39385 readers
1948 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS