194
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 67 points 4 months ago

Sooo, all chips basically.

[-] xkbx@startrek.website 80 points 4 months ago

those fools forgot about lays ๐Ÿ˜Ž

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 months ago

Lays makes good chips. It's too bad that they're really only good for the data center market, since you can't have just one.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago

Raspberry pies and MacBooks across the realm.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 38 points 4 months ago

Maybe they will be investing towards RISC-V chips?

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 4 months ago
[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 12 points 4 months ago

Good. Pump that up. I want to be able to run my favorite open OS on open hardware.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 4 months ago

Worth noting that just because a CPU uses the RISC-V instruction set does not make it open hardware; it just makes it possible for it to be open hardware, but it's still up to the copyright holder to release the source files and design as open source.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

Fair, but it means devs will write software that can one day run on open hardware.

That's true, but open source software is generally written in high level, portable languages that can be compiled to multiple CPU architectures without changing the code, so proprietary software is really what would have any problems running, and even then, there are x86 emulators like Box86/64 and FEX out there and can even work transparently using systemd-binfmt.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

At the application level? Yes. At the OS / package level? It's still a work in progress. And you need the latter to use the former.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 months ago

Still, better than fully proprietary hardware.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

In a small way, yes, in that the software ecosystem built around it would work on future open hardware, but the hardware could absolutely still be fully, 100% proprietary.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

Woule be best case scenario for pretty much everyone except, well, all the companies currently in the space. And western global hegemony.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 months ago

All empires will tumble

[-] Derp@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 months ago

This reads like fake news. No publication date, no sources listed, very vague and self-contradictory on the details. How is no other news outlet corroborating this?

I'd take this one with a huge grain of salt.

[-] allo@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 months ago

in... creasing?

better than outcreasing i guess

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Down with AI art

[-] breakingcups@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

That's going to make things very difficult for them short-term. Medium-term too. Bets are still off on long-term.

[-] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I laugh at your decadent Western technology!

[-] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 months ago
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

I can't read the article for it opens some 1x1 gif at loading, but I suspect they'd only need to write a long form proof of why they need to use exactly that foreign brand for their work etc, and probably if they also have the leverage to do so (so many get filtered out, maybe). That's how it works in Russia for plenty of years after we proclaimed we'd replace imported goods with something we don't even produce lol.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

In other news, Zilog stock sees unprecedented growth.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

This must mean that they're getting cheaper in the West now, right? Right?!

[-] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Chinese rejection -> "Supply chain issues" -> Price goes up. Again.

[-] randombullet@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago
[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago

While I appreciate the joke, they're technically nVidia now

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Bro the trade wars are already poping off. Problem is China has already snapped up the whole global souths market. (minus Australia and New Zealand.) the US and the west don't have enough industry to compete. My god the economic collapse is going to reshape the west. Hopefully what happens after is a far left economic and political system because the far right plan will be to turn the trade war into an actual war to reclaim profits.

China is willing to let millions of it's own people die to achieve its goals. The west doesn't have enough blind dogmatic people in their militaries and governments to suppress civil unrest. We saw this in South Korea recently. The military just didn't have the will to fire on their friends and families. So they just meekly followed orders until it was clear the conservative party wasn't going to be able to maintain power. Hell half of South Korea slept through an attempted dictatorship and the ruling party still couldn't hold power.

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Problem is China has already snapped up the whole global souths market. (minus Australia and New Zealand.)

Australia and New Zealand are not on the global south, "global south" is not about the hemisphere.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Going to pay the pedantics game I see

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago
[-] hash@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago

Reflexively thought this was the onion. Can someone explain yo me how this isn't idiocy?

[-] moody@lemmings.world 22 points 4 months ago

China's a big market, and banning three major brands from being used means those brands will fight against Trump's trade war so they can get access to the market again. There's no way Intel, AMD, and Nvidia will be happy to lose all that money.

[-] Wade@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Will they really lose much money though? Chip makers (NVIDIA especially) have practically been able to sell everything they can produce since before the start of COVID, so I doubt they will lose a lot from this

The Chinese consumer market is larger than the US and EU markets, and is growing, not shrinking. On top of that the Chinese business market is growing and is growing extremely quickly. The backbone of either market in the 21st century is computerized goods.

This is also a sign that the multiple domestic architectures are good enough to act as drop in replacements for at least government work, so business and consumer uses aren't too far behind.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Do they have x86 alternative? Or are consumers still allowed to buy x86 computers? Unclear in article if ban for "businesses" is ban for businesses that make computers using the chips/boards to sell to others.

Has arm gotten good enough for desktops?

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Apple uses Arm for their desktops, including the Mac Pro workstation. I don't know of anything upgradable/customizable like x86 Desktops though.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes they have comparable CPUs from Zhaoxin, which is joint owned by VIA and Chinese government.

Russia also has Baikal.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago
[-] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago

They only need phones

[-] almost1337@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

I wonder how long it'll take for the next Stuxnet to hit Chinese and Russian lithography machines.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
194 points (100.0% liked)

Cybersecurity

7099 readers
14 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS