389
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago
[-] gsfraley@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Give them a nuke back. Them relinquishing theirs assuming good faith by the Russians is half the reason this mess started. If they get one back it makes a push for total control of Ukraine an existential risk for Russia.

Edit: Before someone points it out, yes I'm being wildly naive, let me dream about a good outcome a little.

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Granted.

They don't have to actually get the nuke back.

Everyone just has to think they did. The idea is just as much a weapon as the bomb itself.

The old squirt-gun pistol routine, lol.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

I was a grunt not a rocket scientist so serious question: do we have missiles they can load in the old Soviet silos or would it have to be a SCUD situation?

Either way, giving Kyiv a giant middle finger to wave at Moscow on the way out would be an epic mic drop moment for Biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

Now 'ere's what crazy-ol' u/peopleproblems would do. Crazy ol' u/peopleroblems would come to the sum of bitches we have in Acquisitions, and say 'how many weeks could a force of exactly Ukraine's force hold a position with everything we have currently sitting in storage deployment ready, but not otherwise deployed? Ok, and how about all the equipment we have being delivered under contract for that many weeks? Ok, now, get me a number to replace all that equipment with the newest contracts set to immediately fill everything we send for that first chunk. Ok, now double it, and phone the pencil pushers to get procurement offers for this shit from the defense manufacturers. Yes, definitely let their boards know too. Oh, don't mention where the already purchased equipment is going, that's national security interest. Just mention the US is interested in making them rich in turn for securing our country for a long time."

"And give that number to Congress?"

"Once the various board members hear first. We gotta feed the handlers before we treat the pawns in Congress."

"Sir is that, legal?"

"It's an official act. I just made it legal."

[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I get the sentiment.

But i just want to make sure that everyone here knows that biden doesnt have carte blanche to do what he wants because hes not exactly aligned with the conservative supreme court that decides if its an official act or not.

I see this shit all the time and with the way the election went, im pretty convinced that the american electorate is dumb enough to think biden is actually immune.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

In this case, I don't think SCOTUS would be able to do much. They tied their own hands on the "official presidential act" thing. It would have to be up to congress.

load more comments (4 replies)

Tbh, from what I’ve read, it sounds a lot like Sullivan is the primary character behind all the hesitancy and pussy-footing and restrictions around the military aid coming from the US. As far as I understand it, Sullivan still seems deathly afraid that Russia is some big military bogeyman, when the outcome of the last two years has revealed them to be anything but, and whose only real “virtue” is a willingness to enthusiastically use meat waves at a strategic level. I’m concerned that Sullivan will continue to slow-walk everything, despite the circumstances.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

I love how people in America voted Dems out because they're struggling to feed their families, and Biden's only priorities here are keeping his scumbag son out of prison and making sure war is escalated as much as possible before his term ends.

Great stuff, Genocide Joe.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago

I'm pretty sure Ukraine not defending itself would escalate the war, what with it resulting in Russia taking over the rest of the country.

Although I suppose that would eventually end it. Maybe in the way you want?

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago

I love how uneducated people didn't vote at all and allowed a sexual predator and Russian asset to become president, again.

Great stuff ruskies, but you forgot one thing. never eat the pickle, because you'll choke.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

I love how uneducated people didn’t vote at all

They're not uneducated. They're desperate, and they spent the last 8 years watching both parties ignore how much they're struggling. Why miss a day of work when you know your vote doesn't matter?

Also, you need to ditch this smugness if you want to win people to your side.

[-] Ridgetop18 33 points 2 weeks ago

Spend 8 years watching both parties ignote their struggles, and then vote for the one that's actively promising to make them worse?

Bold move, Cotton.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

They're not uneducated.

They clearly are since they acted against their best interests and only the uneducated and insufferably weak willed work against themselves.

Also, you need to ditch this smugness if you want to win people to your side.

you seem to be under the misconception that I'm trying to win people to my cause. I refuse to pander to their absurd ideals and will not coddle them like children.

point blank, I don't give a damn about their fragile sensibilities about whatever political wedge they want to believe in on a whim.

the people who refused to vote, that allowed this to happen, could rot in the streets as far as I care. They are simply a distraction from the true enemy, Russia and China.

I will do everything within my power to resist Russian and Chinese aggressions. I don't know what I'm going to do, but I know I'm going to do everything I can to be a huge pain in the ass for them.

this includes but is not limited to the netizens who have and are spreading their propaganda.

every raging river starts as a flowing stream.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

Escalated? Oh do tell me how exactly that's going to work. We're already at a full scale invasion with nearly a million casualties. What, are they going to invade harder? Fuck off, spew russian propaganda elsewhere. If you need help grasping the concept, here's a handy chart.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, quick question, which country invade Ukraine? Did the US, is that how they are escalating? Oh wait, no it was russia that did it. Right you meant to blame russia for doing this right?

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah... This is going to Ukraine, so yeah it's just kind of important.

Unless you are one of these people that think Russia should be allowed to just have Ukraine.

[-] TommySalami@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

"the Ukraine" referred to the region while it was still part of the Russian/Soviet empire. Nowadays just "Ukraine" is the better way to say it, from what I understand.

load more comments (30 replies)
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

Big round of golf claps for the "bleed Russia out slowly " strategy.

Top men.... top men.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
389 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39332 readers
2100 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS