305
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

President Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, prompting strong backlash from Republicans.

GOP lawmakers criticized the move as an abuse of power and an attempt to avoid accountability, with figures like Rep. James Comer and Sen. Chuck Grassley calling it hypocritical and corrupt.

Biden defended the pardon, citing “selective prosecution” and claiming Hunter was unfairly targeted due to their family connection.

Hunter faced convictions for federal gun and tax charges.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Many of the same liberals who have been browbeating me over the past several years with their insistence that they are NOT the same as the Trump Republicans, are excusing this.

You're right, liberals. Once again you prove that you are not the same as the Trumpists. Even with this pardon, you do continue to be better than them. You're better than terrible. You're better than horrible, better than abysmal, ever so slightly better than abhorrent. Congratulations.

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 3 points 4 months ago

I saw an excellent analogy on here. The Republican Party is a dad molesting their kid. The Democrats are the mom turning a blind eye. One of those is objectively better than the other, but the kid should be seperated from both. Cheering for blatant political corruption is disgusting regardless of which side does it.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Good thing Joe is not a king right? What if a king assigned a rapist to be the FBI tzar. And what if this tzar could just walk through main street and rape men and women equally in plain daylight? Nobody would bat an eye because hold on, I'm getting rapped right now, but I'll talk about it afterwards?

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Who cares? Fuck them.

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Leftists are fuming too. I guess these politicians are all just dynasties out for themselves. Thanks for nothing, Bye-den.

Guess we're losing the next election too... oh yeah, there isn't one.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago

Just the Russian "leftists."

The man's complicit in genocide, I'm not worried about him making sure outright fascists can't use the courts against his family.

I just think it's silly that he thinks that will be enough, he needs to get his ass out of this country before the handover I'll tell you that.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, the teeth-gnashing about this is incredible. This is not even in the top 50 worst pardons in recent history nor in the top 10 worst acts by Joe Biden. Fuck him, he sucks, but this is an irrelevant footnote compared to both his own actions and the actions of other presidents.

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I'm pretty sure this was part of their plan. It's now legit cover for Trump to pardon whoever they want.

Plus yeah, they want to talk smack. It's not like they have any worthwhile policy ideas.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I mean there's something to be said for handing them some ammo.

Dominate a news cycle with some bullshit and do something shady under the table.

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Jon Stewart outlined it pretty well.

The Dems put this artificial moral framework around themselves that limits how well they can compete with the Right, because it's important

But as soon as they need something for themselves or their family they just break it.

They never break it for the people who need it most.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

If an incoming fascist government were promising retribution for their political opponents, and if there were threats, however fringe, of public executions, I would also pardon my child. I'm honestly surprised more high profile people aren't leaving the country. Though I guess that would be a bad move on multiple levels. What did that one article say? Don't bend the knee until there's a memo saying you have to?

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Also it's probably easier to have them killed outside the country. The CIA and Mossad operate with impunity.

[-] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

I really don't think giving the head of state the power to pardon is a very good idea. I used to be totally baffled how it was a thing at all but the rationale has since been explained to me. While I sorta get it, the theoretical benefit is far outweighed by the inevitable grimy reality. Like others, probably mostly because of my own biases, I find it hard to summon a great deal of outrage about this understandable if blatantly hypocritical move after so much prior abuse of the lower had already occurred, but frankly if the option weren't even there then nobody would even need to talk about this. If the justice system of the nation is supposedly well designed and theoretically trustworthy then there isn't the need to have the ability for it to be arbitrarily overrulled in a manner that operates very much like the monarchical tyrants the United States was supposedly foundationally opposed to.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Fumes a party that endorsed a convicted felon for presidency.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Fumes a party that endorsed a convicted felon for presidency.

[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

“Republicans” “Fume”

I don’t lend any credence to headlines like this anymore. I saw way too many headlines about how “young voters hate Trump” and clearly that meant nothing when election day came so I wish these “news” organizations would shut the fuck up with this bullshit. Just because 2 people do something doesn’t make it news.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I’m not happy about it either. It’s an abuse of power, no matter whose side the guy is on. This just further degrades the office of the president into a self-serving free-for-all.

[-] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

https://x.com/joncoopertweets/status/1859602254577230289

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
305 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23100 readers
2663 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS