578
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is just the extended discography of a gothic folk metal band?

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Died of teeth

Not really sure what I can add to that

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] beerclue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

How many of these are easily treatable today?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HoneyMustardGas@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I didn't know you could die of grief. Also what is 'made away themselves'?

[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Someone didn't watch the Star Wars prequels

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ruk_n_rul@monyet.cc 7 points 2 months ago

Consumption I think is not in the sense of eating, but in the sense of the body eating itself ie wasting away.

[-] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 7 points 2 months ago

Tuberculosis

So many dead children. I count a full one third of all deaths being babies and toddlers.

[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago

It's the reason why so many misleading statistics claim a much shorter lifespan in the past. If you survived childhood, and there wasn't a plague around, or a war, you had good chances of reaching 60.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Life expectancy from birth is easily the most misleading statistic in the history of the social sciences because it is a measure of central tendency (aka an average, specifically, a median) of a property (age at death) that not only has no central tendency but actually has the opposite of a central tendency, with values concentrated at the low end (infant and child mortality) and the high end (old age deaths). In almost all societies ever measured, the life expectancy from birth age is usually the age at which a person is least likely to die.

To add to its misleading nature: demographers usually use the value to express the life chances of the just-born cohort (up to age 5). Since they obviously can't wait 70 or 80 years until half of that cohort has actually died, they instead use curve-fitting to estimate life expectancy based on infant and child mortality actually experienced by the cohort. People often say that life expectancy from birth is misleading because it's heavily impacted by infant and child mortality, but this is not quite correct - it's actually entirely determined by infant and child mortality.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago

Bacteria Virus Cancer Heart Condition Trauma Malnutrition Suicide Kidney Disease Heart Disease Liver Disease Parasite

What else am I missing?

Mostly, they died from a lack of medical knowledge.

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Over-laid" sounds like death by snu-snu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 7 points 2 months ago

This will make a useful crib sheet for reading the causes of death in the US next year under Health Tsar RFK Jnr .

[-] psion1369@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

What is King's Evil and why did so many die from it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

It's interesting how there's a hint of science here, but so much non-science.

Like, trying to categorize things is a bit scientific. Trying to distinguish between similar but different things is a bit scientific. At the same time, so many of these causes of death are symptoms not causes. And, there are too many cases where they didn't bother to try to find a cause, like the "Planet" cases or "Suddenly". Also, almost all of the deaths are in children / infants, but in those cases they don't try to figure out the cause of death, they just note the age.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Lots of great ideas here!

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

8 deaths from plague? Fake news, China plague.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
578 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11946 readers
1092 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS