1337
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackout@fedia.io 121 points 1 month ago

If these are tracks in the US then I just understaff the engineers and maintenance teams and the train derails before I have to make a decision, checkmate.

[-] matlag@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

If these tracks are in the US, so I am. So I shoot the other guy with the gun(s) I usually carry around when I go out and then pull the lever.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 month ago

This feels too high quality for a shit post.

[-] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

Gotta make sure your fiber intake is decent so you get good quality shit like this

[-] chtk@feddit.nl 90 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

wow what an excellent day in the neighbourhood

i sure hope I won't be faced with an ethical dilemma in the very near future

oh rats it's the trolley problem

[-] UmeU@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

This was super funny, this person has a great career ahead of her. Very Tim and Eric style obscure indie comedy, I loved it.

[-] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 62 points 1 month ago

This isn't philosophy anymore, it's just game theory

[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

it's interdisciplinary.

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

por qué no los dos

load more comments (4 replies)

for the longest time, i did know that game theory did not have anything to do with “games” and that it is somehow connected to the prisoners dilemma, but the concept as such wasn’t very clear to me. If you are like my former me, take 30 minutes out of your day and visit https://ncase.me/trust/ to learn and play around with game theory; it’s a great webpage and it’s pretty good fun all around.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 month ago

Unlike the classic prisoners dilemma, this isn't a nash equilibrium. When I know that the other person pulls their switch, I'd improve my outcome by not pulling mine. Compare to the prisoners dilemma, where not snitching when the other side snitches earns you five years in prison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] holycrap@lemm.ee 45 points 1 month ago

Which relative is on the track and which in the trolley?

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Your hot cousin is on the track. What would you do?

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Don't pull the lever, then there's three thirds of hot cousin to go around regardless of the other person's decision. Philosophy is easy.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wabafee@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Do nothing that way you don't get to jail for murder. All the pressure goes to the other guy. Sue the railway company, guy who pulled the lever and the creator. Another is find a way not to reach to that point.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago

I feel like you're not internalizing that this is a thought experiment.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is only superficially a prisoner's dilemma. In a true one, you cannot get a better result for yourself no matter what the other person does, but here if you assume the other person pulled the lever, there is no reason to pull the lever yourself.

To fix this, you can have 4 relatives on the trolley, and 5 of the opposite faction way back on the middle track. Both do nothing, 1 relative of each is killed. One guy switches the lever, their relatives are all fine, other guy loses 5. Both switch, crash with all 8 relatives on the trolley dead.

[-] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I see what you're trying to do and you're not necessarily wrong, but you're kinda perpetuating the attitude that inspired someone to make this meme in the first place

load more comments (3 replies)

You pull the lever, then pew pew pew the other person near the lever.

Boom.

Did I solve it?

Where's my prize?

Wait a minute, gotta shoot everyone else related too. Don't want to face any revenge.

Automatic Weaponry goes brrrr

No witnesses

Okay I saved 1 of my loved ones.

Bingo?

Now theres only one color of people.

Wait am I a racist?

[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Yell to the guy on the other side that I'm going to pull the lever, so he'd better not.

Then let it go because that both maximizes global utility and poses the lowest risk of the worst case scenario.

"WHAT? I CANT HEAR YOU THE TRAIN IS TOO LOUD!" pulls lever

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] somewhathinged@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

If you think about this for any length of time and actually imagine this scenario, you realise you don't pull the lever and it's not even close.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago

Wrong. You pick the obviously wrong moral stance and then aggressively yell about it on the internet. The more obvious it becomes that you are wrong, the louder you yell. This protects your ego from introspection.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)

Theoretically, will a collision cause a breach of the radioactive material that's in the box with my cat? Asking for a friend.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] _bcron@midwest.social 15 points 1 month ago

The outcome from both levers pulled is so steep that it really makes no sense to pull the lever

[-] owsei@programming.dev 28 points 1 month ago

That's why they won't pull the lever, and that's why you should.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] aviationeast@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Questions: why doesn't the person at the switch run and get the person off the tracks? And the people on the trolley hop off or try to the sslow the trolley?

[-] actually@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I think this exposes the sadism of philosophy the past few hundred years.

Often, it’s been some rich idle folks making up murderous fantasies in their heads while looking down at my ancestors . “Oh, you don’t know page 273 of Aristotle’s rejoinder? Haha, you must be too poor”.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Have these folks seen The Good Place? Or are they just approaching the same conclusion by accident?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

mercifully pulling both levers.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

But then how do you kill the remaining two people?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think these scenarios might be easier to analyze if we made them a bit more realistic.

This an analogy for military intervention. If we empower our military to be proactive, we can save one "good guy"^TM^ by killing 3 bystanders. But if NATO's adversaries are participating too we lose 3 of our "good guy"^TM^

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

I think the abstract nature is one of the strengths. If you ask someone a question about military intervention, their pre-existing views towards military intervention will heavily bias their answer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago

Sounds like your typical game theory problem.

Not pulling the lever: Worst case: Your loved ones dies Best case: None

Pulling the lever: Worst case: Your loved ones dies Best case: Your loved ones survives

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Worst case for pulling the lever is 5 loved ones die and so do 8 strangers.

Its stated that when not pulling the lever the loved ones on the cart to survive (with ptsd).

Highest risk/best reward vs No risk/minimal loss.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

The meaning behind the trolly problem has been entirely eroded at this point.

[-] sergih@feddit.cl 12 points 1 month ago

This guy is already implying that youll like it better if 3 randoms die as 1 loved one, he's choosing for you already in the explanation 😭😭😭

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wirlocke 11 points 1 month ago

How much did I like that one guy really.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] UmeU@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

To quote something I made up and say all the time, “It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose.”

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would tie a really really long string to the lever and attach the string to a large bird and then scare it into flying away. Then I would eat some delicious Heinz Baked Beans

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I ban trolleys. Everyone walks.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Throw the trolley off the side of the ferry.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Which loved one are we talking about here? Some are more loved than others.

[-] Peck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Well obviously you should pull the lever once the front wheels past the split but before the rear wheels cross it, so that trolley gets off the rails. This way everybody has the chance to survive and you have defensible position during inevitable court hearing.

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

For some people, this is a problem. For others, this is a solution.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
1337 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27292 readers
3173 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS