367
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Vittelius@feddit.org to c/world@lemmy.world

Women “would have their uteruses removed when they turn over 30,” Naoki Hyakuta, leader of the Conservative Party of Japan, said in a stream on his YouTube channel on Friday.

On the channel, he also said that he would make it law for “women who are single after 25 years old not to be allowed to marry.”

(...)

Later, Hyakuta posted an apology on his X account. “I cannot deny that the expressions were too harsh,” he said. “I apologize for those who were offended.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 174 points 2 months ago

WTF is happening in this world

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 146 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've been saying it since 2015, but it bears repeating!

The global conservative propaganda machine — lead by the US and Russia — is using all of the data obtained from surveillance capitalism to target, A/B test, and iterate on psychological warfare across social media in real-time (as close to as the platforms allow). The most criminally corrupt and sociopathic benefit the most, as there is no limit to how depraved they will go — bots, lies, disinformation, deep fakes, utilizing actual criminal enterprises and scam operations, illegally obtained data — they will do whatever it takes to succeed.

There really isn't much difference between persuading you to buy a product and persuading you to vote for a political party; they both attack similar weaknesses and vulnerabilities, and the process of building the data pipelines and statistical models is nearly identical. People who knew history were always saying that this is what surveillance capitalism would lead to eventually. I don't think any of us thought it would happen so quickly, but the lack of regulation and highly centralized nature of social media meant that a relatively small operation could access 90% of the Internet using population.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 51 points 2 months ago

Persuading you to vote for their guy, or if you’re disinclined to do so, persuading you to not vote by instilling disgust/outrage (see also: “Genocide Joe”) or just a blackpilled sense of powerlessness.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 months ago

Unchecked access to the internet by people who aren't emotionally mature enough to handle it.

Allowing all of humanity onto the internet when 30% of people still believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows was a mistake.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago

Allowing all of humanity onto the internet when 30% of people still believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows was a mistake.

You are referrering to children. Right? And I've lived a considerable amount of my life taking this as an urban legend. Not a fact.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

My apologies. I totally flipped some numbers. It's actually 7% of people (not children) surveyed believe that chocolate milk is from brown cows.

Now the survey wasn't too robust with 5000 total respondents but it's still embarrassing that that number isn't like "Seven American adults in total believe chocolate milk is from brown cows"

Here's a CNN fluff piece on it https://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/16/us/chocolate-milk-help-trnd/index.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Here’s a real number. 56% of Americans read at or below a sixth grade reading level.

When complex topics like the economy are discussed, _at least _ 56% can’t comprehend the concepts because they lack the vocabulary. They do not understand how government works, or their own bodies, or diplomacy, or historical contexts. They are not capable of being part of many important national conversations.

Now couple this with the fact that Democrats are terrible at messaging and simplifying complex policy into digestible sound bites while Republicans have perfected it, and you can easily see how we get to where we are now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 months ago

Men are going off the deep end

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

And many of us men are just as baffled by it. I honestly don’t understand why there are so many men – who I’m sure shutter at any mention of a woman’s period – that feel the need to control every aspect of reproduction and do so in the most cruel ways.

But also, the women who voted in support of those men are exponentially more baffling to me.

My brain hurts trying to understand it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 332@feddit.nu 105 points 2 months ago

What the fuck is even going on here, this doesn't even align with their own weird agenda? This just seems psychotic for it's own sake.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Shock and Awe. He will say some heinous shit in a few days that’s slightly less evil and that will sound reasonable to the rightoids

Basically how Trump speech got normalized in the west.

[-] variants@possumpat.io 17 points 2 months ago

And then slowly go back to the original plan

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Is it really any different than forcing a woman to carry and raise her rapist’s child?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 102 points 2 months ago

Just in case anyone is wondering, this is a fringe right-wing party with one seat in Japanese Parliament's lower house.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 51 points 2 months ago

This is how it started in most EU countries: one MP who is an idiot, but gains in representation every election by also taking advantage of the contradictions of governing. These idiots did not use to grow, but now they do...and they are networked too now.

[-] devfuuu@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

From one seat in my country to almost having a full right wing government in the last elections. Yeah, it's not gonna end well for nobody if this shit keeps going up everywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] k0mprssd@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

good point, but I worry about a loop of the media giving attention, making people more aware that this party exists, ignorant people give them more support, repeat. seems like a similar strategy happened in the us with our media giving trump endless headlines.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago

this is a fringe right-wing party with one seat in Japanese Parliament's lower house.

One seat too many, if this is the attitude of their leader.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 months ago

Trump was considered a fringe party to.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 101 points 2 months ago

Smart move for a country with a birth rate going off the cliffs and a terminal case of xenophobism.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago

My assumption is this is to increase the birth rate. The birth rate over 30 is probably lower, and putting a deadline forces you into a FOMO situation. You fear the consequences, so you just get married and have children.

Obviously, this is horrible for human rights (if you consider the rights of women to be human rights, which I at least do). I'm just saying it may be better for births than it appears. It's like video games restricting sale of items can increase sales of them. The human brain is easily manipulated by FOMO, especially with something this severe I'd imagine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I'm actually hella curious what the context was here. Why would he want any of that?

[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 87 points 2 months ago

“I apologize for those who were offended.”

‘I’m sorry you’re offended by my abhorrent opinions’

Notice he’s not actually apologizing. At all. He’s just sorry he’s catching flak about it

[-] warbond@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

I'm sorry you think I need to apologize

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 63 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because reading those sentences severely reduced my intelect, can please someone explain the brain dead logic of that loon? in very simple terms

What is to gain from sterilizing women? In a severely aged country with low birth rates, as it is?

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 85 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Its a threat to woman that if they don't get married young and have babies, the government will hurt them.

That it. Do what we say or else. The standard conservative line with women.

With trumps win, expect more of this. Being a complete piece of shit clearly works, so this will only escalate. Getting attention, even by being a vile misogynist, is a winning move now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bougie_Birdie 15 points 2 months ago

This seems to be about oppressing women while uplifting the creepiest sort of men.

To give the maximum benefit of the doubt (which frankly, I don't think they deserve), there's evidence to suggest that birth defects become more likely as the mother gets older. I've always understood that to happen in women of a more advanced age though, 30 is too young to be a cutoff.

Also, women can't marry older than 25? What kind of bass ackwards handmaid's tale bullshit is that? If you want to have a family I guess you've got to hitch your wagon to any horse you can get your hands on. They're so fortunate though that the law doesn't apply to men, so they'll have plenty of creepy fifty year old dudes to choose from.

I think as a rule we should start sterilizing politicians who endorse sterilization. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right? Of course, a hysterectomy is quite an invasive procedure compared to a vasectomy, so maybe in the interest of equitability we should begin with castration.

Anyway, this kind of rhetoric isn't really for women - they just happen to be the ones affected by it. For the men that this appeals to, they're probably believe they're more likely to attract a virginal beauty if they start removing women's options. It's truly abhorrent.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago

Sterilization for those who support it seems a fair proposal. Set an example.

[-] VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

women can't marry older than 25? What kind of bass ackwards handmaid's tale bullshit is that?

Japanese instructors in college would tell us how older unmarried women would be referred to as 'Christmas Cakes'--no one wanted one after the 25th. Although they were happy that had been a changing attitude.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 53 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Is it Japan's turn to have a go at surfing the wave of stupid?

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 months ago

Always has been. It’s a country of racist conservatives that continue to deny past genocides. They’re good at cleaning things tho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VerticaGG 48 points 2 months ago

Passing this on:

A uterus is NOT disposable even when you don't want to have kids - it serves a purpose in women's bodily health. If you need to get it removed for health reasons then absolutely do it, but please don't ever think uterus + breasts serve no purpose when you're not having kids. They greatly participate in the hormonal health of the body & brain, in the lymphatic structure, keeping other organs in their place, and it has been now proven by studies that if you do a hysterectomy when young it greatly affects your risk to get alzheimer's/dementia. This is not to say you shouldn't take care of your reproduction or get yourself sterilized if you want. But patriarchy has already commodified every body part of ours; please, let's appreciate our natural bodies and health and not take it for granted. Please do not think your bodyparts are disposable if you are not having kids. That's what men think. Your body parts are valuable and an important part of YOU. They serve YOU and your health, no-one else. You are not a barbie doll that can have parts taken out without consequences. You do not consist of parts, you are a whole person. You are a lovely, important human, and your health and body parts belong to you. I know we are taught to think about ourselves as a collection of body parts and to nit pick them apart, but I want to stress this is a patriarchal way of thinking. Your womb does not suddenly become irrelevant if you're not in relationships with men. It is still hugely important to YOU.💜

So yeah, as usual, why in the world should anyone except the person with the uterus, getting a say in the matter?

[-] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

What in the fuck did I just read

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fin@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 months ago

Naoki Hyakuta

He’s a notorious piece of crap in Japan.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 30 points 2 months ago

Women over 30 cant marry? I think this dude is a lolicon. Someone check his pc.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Won't do any good. Legal age of consent in Japan is 13.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not since last year, when it was raised to 16.

Even then that was the national minimum set over a hundred years ago.

In practice it's 18 in most prefectures, and has been for years, due to local law setting it to something sane.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

I would very much enjoy having the reasoning behind that low bar explained to me.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There isn't one. They are repeating a technically kind-of-true funny ha-ha internet factoid.

The effective age of consent is higher, as prefectures all have local laws setting it to something sane, but people say it's 13 because it was the old national minimum on record up until last year.

And that national law was literally from over a hundred years back, and was finally updated last year to raise the national minimum to 16. Still lower than the 18 in effect in places like Tokyo.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Maybe a Japanese politician should be aware of his country's history on the matter before discussing forced sterilization...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

As a single (gay) woman over 30 who’s tired of having a uterus I’m moving to japan lmfao

[-] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

The Japanese branch of the Taliban.

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago

Someone got jilted by a 17 year old

[-] hungryphrog 10 points 2 months ago

I'm going to remove this guy's lungs if he doesn't shut the fuck up

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Free tube tying for everyone above 25? I knew about some villages in poor rural India and african countries that did this to limit teen pregnancy and over population. The complete opposite of what Japan is dealing with

[-] xorollo@leminal.space 7 points 2 months ago

I read uterus removal, not tube tying. Maybe a pedantic difference, but is he explicitly trying to highlight the threat value for the statement?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Imagine one of your brain cells trying to gain a leadership position by promising to make your body jump off the next cliff you see

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago

This site refuses to Server its content.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
367 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39626 readers
1388 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS