126
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by fukhueson@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 month ago

in 2017, then-President Donald Trump withdrew from the plan, saying it did not curtail Iran’s ballistic missile program or the influence of Iran’s powerful proxies in the region. Since the U.S. exit, Iran has steadily blown through the restrictions on its nuclear activities and blocked international inspectors from seeing some nuclear sites.

Louder for the people in the back please.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 21 points 1 month ago

Trump really is the gift that keeps on giving.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

Like herpes

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

What do you mean, this is biden's fault!!1! He let Iran get the bomb

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I hope this is sarcasm.

I really don't know anymore. You can put the evidence directly in front of someone's face and they choose to ignore and deny its existence.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Should I have added more exclamation marks and ones to show how serious I was?

[-] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Good. With Israel's aggression, Iran deserves a nuclear deterrent. Thank you Trump!

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

The United States has historically empowered Israel as a deterrent to Iran's hostility in the region and towards the US. I agree that defensive measures are necessary but the efforts that Trump has taken go too far to promote the annihilation of non-Jews in the region.

Trump is pure evil. He is measurably worse than anything Biden has done / not done. If you believe otherwise you are forgetting or ignoring the Trump administration.

To thank Trump about this is to thank him for taking steps towards nuclear war.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Why change the headline?

Iran signals possible change in its nuclear doctrine and says it has the capacity to make nukes

[-] fukhueson@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It was the headline that loaded when I put the URL in, if I can change the headline to what it currently says I will.

Done.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Lemmy better than Reddit

[-] Talaraine@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago

Well duh, you didn't think Iran was getting nothing for sending all those drones to Russia, did you?

[-] ZaraL@discuss.online 9 points 1 month ago

Good. Hopefully now Israel will think twice about invading a 3rd country.

[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Israel would never invade Iran.

1 they don't have the manpower

2 there's hundreds of miles of 2 other countries in the way

[-] ZaraL@discuss.online 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Poland was in between Russia and Germany, and Germany didn't have the manpower, they still tried.

[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yes that situation famously worked super well for Germany

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It's easy to forget that Iran is in close communication with organizations it funds, including Hamas and Hezbollah. How much do they signal to these organizations their readiness for war with Israel? I'd like to know if Hamas leaders had any indication a year ago that it would be a good time to carry out the deadliest ground invasion of Israel in its history.

Iran has been chasing nuclear capability for decades and now they suddenly achieve it?

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

they might have gotten some help from putin in exchange for munitions and other goodies. dprk, too, for that matter.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

They have both a ballistic missile and nuclear energy program, and have been developing them for decades. It's a short hop to combine them.

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago

Not to mention that, being a decently sizable country, making them is really more a matter of motivation to put in the resources and deal with the diplomatic effects than it is capacity ultimately. Like, North Korea was able to build them with a fraction of the population and economy and as even more of a pariah state, the technology has existed for just about 80 years at this point and while details of the specifics are secret, the basic gist of what they require is well known. Basically any country that isnt a microstate probably could build a few eventually, if they really wanted to spend all the money

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

you're overthinking it. yesterday an alleged draft text of ceasefire deal between israel and lebanon was doing rounds on twitter and telegram

[-] febra@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

They should. Israel already has nukes and the western powers haven't done jack shit about it. Why wouldn't Iran get some too?

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

They really shouldn’t; simply because we can’t trust Israel to be a rational actor in the region and not perform a “pre-emptive” strike.

[-] buttfarts@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago

Oddly, Iranian women showing their hair is the best way to defeat the Iranian regime.

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
126 points (100.0% liked)

News

23616 readers
2948 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS