471
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] donio@lemmy.world 89 points 5 months ago

What I see is an inexperienced developer who instead of systematically debugging the issue keeps trying random stuff hoping that it will somehow work.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 48 points 5 months ago

What I see is the developer who's left after multiple rounds of cost cutting layoffs and subsequent exodus of anyone qualified, that knows they are only there because they are willing to work for the least amount of money, and are willing to endure abuse from their sadistic manager, not knowing how to systematically debug the mountain of accumulated issues, and keeps trying random stuff hoping that anything will somehow work.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 26 points 5 months ago

Eh, that moment when you get a different error message tho ;)

[-] drew_belloc@programming.dev 13 points 5 months ago

That is what hope and dreams are made of

[-] Prok@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Shit, did I forget to close my blinds again!?

[-] d2k1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 5 months ago

Back in my day we called that Programming by Coincidence.

[-] Droechai@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago

Scattershot troubleshooting is the most frustrating way of looking for solutions, can't imagine why that would be any sane persons first option, or even before asking for another set of eyes.

Not really relevant to your comment, just that I've seen that myself a few times and it always frustrates me. Especially if the person does multiple changes so it's hard to find the origin of any new issues

[-] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Tell me about it, all the juniors were doing it at my old job, and I was usually the one tasked with fixing their shit. And since we basically didn't do any form of mentoring (including code reviews) it was such a pain in the ass to get them to change their ways

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 5 months ago

Tell me about it, when the roles are reversed and nor the manager ex-dev nor the older dev care about good programming practices it's a far west where the junior desperately tries to become the dictator of a ruleless country

[-] Xanvial@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

But if you do it fast enough, you can call it Machine Learning

[-] PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 45 points 5 months ago

Immediately onto the lap.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 37 points 5 months ago

Christ almighty, this is perfect. Literally my life for the past twenty years, except the I start by assuming they did something dumb, so I would have checked the lid first. Then promptly they spill it unto their lap and I have to clean it.

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

"whatever you do don't forget to check the big tab is on the left and the little tab is on the right, even if you get it backwards it won't close as a safety precaution."

Gets call of machine not working in another country, sends out consultant.

Big tab is on the right, little tab is on the left and the entire tray has been forced into position because "it wasn't closing properly so we had to apply a lot of force"

Professionals with confidence are the absolute worst, I tell ever consultant or technician that comes into my lab "I'll be in the corner if you need me to grab you any supplies or coffee, do you mind if I ask questions as you go so I can have a better understanding of what's going on with this magical box". I like to think they appreciate me.

[-] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago

The real question is, what the hell are they eating?

[-] badgey_fan_boy@startrek.website 6 points 5 months ago

They almost look like big flans.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

When will humans stop enjoying painfully staged videos like this? Like, who tilts the object away from themself but towards the camera to check why it’s not working?

[-] ik5pvx@lemmy.world 87 points 5 months ago

Comedy can be staged and still be funny. It's acting.

[-] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 months ago

Technically, all comedy is staged unless you're laughing at someone's real life misfortune.

[-] neatchee@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's a charicature. I'm not laughing because I think it's real (which would be kind of mean, anyway, since I'd just be laughing at someone screwing up). I'm laughing because it's relatable to real experiences many people have had, and because of the added commentary about software development.

Your hyperfocus on reality in media, and failure to see the comedy for what it truly is, is far more cringe than the video 😉

EDIT: it's like asking why people laugh at the obviously fake stories stand-up comedians tell because they're made up. Like, yeah, no shit, that's not the point.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

To be fair, I think the majority of stand up comedians are also painful to listen to.

But you’re right, this is an exaggerated caricature of reality, like Monty Python or the Three Stooges but far less so.

[-] neatchee@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I appreciate your capacity to recognize a valid argument even when it conflicts with your initial position ❤️ It's more than I expect from the average internet commenter

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 17 points 5 months ago

It's not pretending to be genuine

[-] Melt@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

Do you only watch documentary and can't enjoy any movies or any fiction ever?

[-] pfm@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 5 months ago

Talk to the manager Karen! Do it!

[-] CaptSatelliteJack@lemy.lol 7 points 5 months ago

Do you also complain about movies being staged?

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Wait, Star Wars didn't happen?

[-] techwithjake@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Only when it stops getting views. These and similar types of videos can garner views, which can then in turn garner money. If it's a low-effort/high-reward scenario, why not try it?

I don't like them anymore than you do cause they're so predictable but it makes people laugh and thus want more. That 10 second dopamine rush is addictive.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Indeed, it turns out that high quality content is high effort, and therefore has a weaker ROI. I know it’s simply game theory, I just hate this particular game.

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
471 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

34877 readers
50 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS