1

Pure walled-garden behavior from the Minetest devs.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mlfh@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago

The feature request includes the phrase "Behind the scenes there would need to be some cryptographic magic," because it's just yet another "I have a sweet idea for an app, bro, I just need you to do the coding for me" pitch.

The project has 766 contributors with pull requests being accepted all the time. That's not a walled garden.

[-] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

What I meant by "walled garden" is about federation and not commits, like look at the Signal app federation situation, they rejeted it because it might be confused with cyptocurrency, which I did hate because of its volatility

[-] joeldebruijn@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Alternative idea .... Someone uses OpenConext to provide a federation hub connecting minetest servers with identity providers. You can even call it LuantiID.

https://openconext.org/

[-] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I don't see how this is such a big issue. Would feel weird to not be able to change username per server. Sometimes as my name for playing with friends or a pseudonyme if playing with strangers?

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

OpenSourceGames

2555 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS