45
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

My understanding is that if you're working in tech at GCHQ, you're dealing with fossils—both your colleagues and the actual tech stack itself. Apparently any kind of meaningful change has to go through countless layers of scrutiny and review, taking weeks.

You also need to basically nuke your social media and lie to your friends and family on the regular. Which IMO effectively means you need to be thinking about your job 24/7, and therefore are working 24/7.

~£40k isn't even close to the low-water mark for an entry level job given all that IMO. If they want such a specialist skillset too, they're probably gonna need to add a zero if they actually want to attract anyone good.

There are even other parts of the government that don't have all that baggage and pay more.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 10 points 2 weeks ago

It doesn't help that GCHQ is mainly seen as a department that enables all the authoritarian aspects of government in the digital age. Nobody wants to have their work put to use against their own countrymen.

Now, the truth maybe different but GCHQ is so secretive, nobody knows.

[-] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There seems to be a race to the bottom when it comes to pay across all industries. These are wages from almost 30 years ago for a middle level IT person. In 1994 a typical high end IT manager for a national corporation was around £70k+.

Edit: I just remembered that in 1996 the company I worked for paid £1k per day for an external contractor to provide Unix and IP networking consultancy services to one staff member. That went on for five days per week for about a month at least. That staff member was on about £40k.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago

The private sector is all right, but the public sector is absolutely mad. Everything is being run by committees these days which is a polite way of saying that everything is run by idiots that don't respect other people's talents. Also there's always someone that thinks that "patriotism" will somehow fill the pay gap.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

When the gap was only £10-20k a few years ago, you could justify to yourself that sticking in the public sector was probably affording you some quality of life benefits.

Now the gap is more like tripling your salary and nearly everyone good has left for greener pastures. Hell, the work/life balance didn't even change much for me

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago

Governments see inflation as a way of making things cheaper in real terms. Public sector wages should be index linked IMHO, but I'm always told that to do so would be "inflationary". To put that another way - Not giving people real-terms pay cuts is, apparently, a driver of inflation.

Economists have built a system which relies on the buying power of the workers going down.

[-] benyameen@feddit.uk 8 points 2 weeks ago

The same as most other industries then.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

While they might need one, they surely don't look like they want one with that kind of payment offer.

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Bruh. If anything they should pay extra for all the clearance one has to get as well. I love cyberchef, it's unironically a point of national pride for me, but something's got to give

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
45 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4092 readers
66 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS