520
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by moss to c/196

When given a choice between a millitary industrial neoliberal with a rainbow voting base and a fascist who is one elon musk golf session away from banning HRT, the best option is certainly not to refuse to play out of protest

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 107 points 4 weeks ago

The best way I've seen anyone put it is that by the time the election arrives, you are exclusively in damage control mode. If you want actual change, you have to have it done by getting your personal choice voted in during the primaries.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago

And I'd add - get active the other 364 days of the year.

If we want better options we first need ranked choice voting and we need to get money out of politics. And none of that is going to happen if our only political action each year is voting.

[-] ProfessorPeregrine@reddthat.com 19 points 3 weeks ago

Proud to say that in Colorado, ranked choice voting is on the ballot this year! It's even supported by the big political names here, including the governor.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly! They're putting in the work there and getting some fantastic things done. Lots of other great stuff on that ballot too.

[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

At local level. Organize school board, dog catcher, judges, city council, planing commission, library board, community college board, do what the right wing does

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago

do what the right wing does

Maybe with just a little less cross burning, lynching, and religious extremism.

[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

This is really key, though the state level is probably most important. If your voting activism doesn't go beyond the presidential election, it's performative at most. A third party candidate without members of their party is state houses and Congress is going to be fairly ineffective even if they somehow did do the impossible and get elected.

[-] moss 14 points 4 weeks ago
[-] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 weeks ago
[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 weeks ago

Yes. And Biden was chosen, which includes Harris being next up if Biden couldn't perform the duties of president for any reason. If Democrats didn't want the status quo, they should have chosen someone other than Biden.

[-] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly we just had an election where I live where the options were (not to this extreme at all) but pretty similar in the "not great" vs "fucking awful" choices. Of course we had an actual third party with good policies but they had no chance. The race was so close here that in some areas the difference in votes was in the hundreds for the top two choices. They're still doing recounts and I guess we'll see, but every single fucking vote has counted on this.

I honestly don't believe that not voting is ever going to work. If we want change we need an actual fucking revolution. Not voting, in American's case, would just allow for the literal militants to take over and then you really won't even have the choice to protest anything in the future.

[-] ProdigiousFrog@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

We need to focus on prefigurative politics, I.e, build the world we want to see with direct action, unionizing, and mutual aid, since voting and governments are never going to do it for us.

However, who is in charge of your country will make those prefigurative politics more or less hard, or even impossible (can't imagine much of the above going on in Nazi Germany...)

I think it goes without saying that it will be less hard under Harris.

[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 3 weeks ago

the last thing Mitch McConnell sees before his ping hits 8000

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RAM@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 3 weeks ago

for those, like me, who can't remember where they've seen the original image before, it is the necrons from Warhammer 40k :)

https://warhammer40k.fandom.com/wiki/Necrons#Necrons_in_the_41st_Millennium

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] j0j0@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Obamna prisom

[-] SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Pictured: Newly-unveiled biologically-engineered troops of the National Guard enforcing the new State Ideology of Obamunism in Mar-a-Lago (2009, colorized)

[-] moss 7 points 3 weeks ago

this is my American Dream™

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

This is what’s in Alex Jones’ dreams

[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And remember to vote for whoever you want. Just because you vote third party doesn't mean your vote is wasted or to vote for somebody else because who knows who you would have voted for if it wasn't for third party. Those people that say that shit can fuck off.

Edit: y'all are just as bad as maga losers. If I don't vote for your guy, it's a wasted vote. Just go out and vote, period, for whoever you want. Ignore all these people trying to get you to vote for their person. Vote for whomever YOU like. Nothing wrong with endorsing a candidate but trying to make someone look stupid or evil for voting is really pathetic.

[-] sylveon 54 points 4 weeks ago

Either Harris or Trump are going to win the election. Not voting for Harris is voting for Trump. Yes, it fucking sucks, but especially if you're a woman or a queer person, really think about whether you actually think it doesn't matter which one wins.

Voting is not an endorsement of a candidate. It's a tool. Don't let them take away your rights while you're waiting for the perfect candidate that will never come.

[-] moss 15 points 3 weeks ago

Charitable read: I think they're talking in general, not just for the president. voting third party is actually pretty viable in certain areas of the country for certain state positions

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moss 35 points 4 weeks ago

yes but also if you're in a swing state maybe don't vote third party for the executive office. Rn the thrid party persidential candidates aren't super strong, and the bulk of political momentum is bipartisan. Local and state gov is a totally different situation depending on your state.

[-] sylveon 18 points 3 weeks ago

Good point. A candidate from a party that doesn't really have a presence in any level of government and especially zero seats in congress will probably never have a realistic chance of winning the presidential election, barring some exceptional circumstances. If you like a third party, trying to make it viable at the local level and moving up from there seems to be the only realistic option to me.

[-] moss 13 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

like the working families party, who actually have some substantial influence in the new york area

[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Working Families is actually stronger than the democrats out here. I vote WF everywhere their name pops up. They got governors in out here in Oregon.

[-] moss 7 points 3 weeks ago

I'm a big supporter of the working families party. They rule. I honestly think they have the best chance of any of the third parties of eventually becoming a viable player in the American political sphere

[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

(Also WF backed Harris/Walz, they’re not dumb enough to try to tamper with the big race.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moss 7 points 4 weeks ago

empowering parties in this way could pave the way for future third party presidential candidates

[-] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 weeks ago

I'm down for leaving people to vote for who they want, as long as they allow their protest votes to weigh heavily on their consciences when January comes around and we suddenly live in the fourth reich

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BluJay320 19 points 3 weeks ago

Except it is wasted because there is literally zero chance a 3rd party candidate will win the presidency. If we’re talking lower offices, then maybe, but if you’re not voting Harris then you are directly assisting Trump.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Remember: the only people who say this want to see Trump win. You can vote with your conscience all you want, but it's only mathematically possible for only one of two parties to get elected.

If third parties or independents actually wanted a shot, they'd put in the work outside of elections, building coalitions and locally from the ground up.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] msgraves@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago

any vote not for Harris is a vote for trump.

[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Not if they were gonna vote trump instead

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 weeks ago

For those wondering about Obama's last name: Here is a mathematical proof

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Simple game theory

Harris: +1. Because she actually is a good person. The only people saying anything else are Republicans really . Don't forget she used to fight for sexual assault victims and such (look at her past actions). Walz is just as good as a person

Trump: -1: no explanation needed

Anyone else: 0 points

It's only logical to vote for Harris/Walz. Unless you actually believe trump . But, if you use the arguments Trump has used against Biden and Harris, you'll see all of them work equally well on him. He is sleepy, he is old, and he is a criminal

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 10_0@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Obama stone

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
520 points (100.0% liked)

196

16542 readers
2254 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS