554
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Aeri@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

That's how all products should be

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 5 hours ago

Isn't that generally how Valve operates on the whole anyway? They don't set out to make products; they just do what they want and if they actually finish it, they sell it.

[-] PanArab@lemm.ee 12 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I am impressed with how many games are now playable on Linux with Proton and how well they look and play, to think this game meanwhile has graphics glitches on the PS5. I might get one myself.

[-] yetiftw@lemmy.world 101 points 18 hours ago

and that's the secret to a good product

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 39 points 15 hours ago

And it's why I hate capitalism as a consumer.

"People need an incentive to invent things!"

Well, if that incentive is making money instead of making a great thing, it's probably not going to be a great thing. Great things make money.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago

Oh hey, that’s why I hate capitalism as an engineer. The endless pursuit of profit first rather than making good things that people want is disheartening as someone who just wants to make things that make life better

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 13 hours ago

3D printing is such a boon for this. You can make things for yourself put it online for free, and other people can also make it. There's no need for a profit incentive. I hope in the future everyone owns a 3D printer.

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Listen. We need you to shave another $0.13 off the cost of the unit. Just like, reduce the quality a bit. No end user will ever notice.

[-] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago

Exactly, if you want a good product, have the developers make what "they" want. Usually works out.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

That’s how you end up with Arch Linux.

[-] pscamodio@feddit.it 3 points 13 hours ago

This may work if the developer is a possible client too like in this case. But I feel that's the exception.

Do what the clients want and not what developers, designers or management want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Emmie@lemm.ee 15 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

There’s another product that probably was this and ended up… somewhat badly. Valve index

It wasn’t bad in itself but the whole vr thing kinda missed the chance for whatever reason and now Zuckerberg took over it mercilessly. Maybe it was naive to think it will ever take hold outside of simming

Still the beginnings were real fun and that valve demo was so real I had panic attack from past me agoraphobia while in tutorial

[-] tee9000@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Warning: the following opinion has not been approved by Lemmy.

Meta has done a lot for VR and the tech is just getting started.

[-] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

A big part of the reason was that Facebook offered game studios a big upfront sum if they made their games work on whatever headset they were selling at the time in standalone mode with no major caveats. The headset only had an anemic mobile GPU, so was only capable of as much as mobile games were doing at the time. A bunch of studios took them up on this offer, and cut back their projects' scope to be viable under the hardware constraints, so nearly everything that got made was gimmicky mobile-style minigames, and obviously that's not what makes people want to drop hundreds of dollars on hardware, as they can get their fill by borrowing someone else's headset for an hour.

Mobile GPUs have improved, so standalone headsets aren't as terrible now, but we missed the expensive toy for enthusiasts and arcades phase and soured most people's opinions by making their first VR experience shovelware.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Valve isn't done in VR. it doesn't feel the need to put out a headset every year.

Same with the Vive. It wasn't the end. Index isn't the end. When they find something they can innovate they will.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 14 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, it's really sad. VR is great for some experiences. There's just two issues with it. The largest is the price. It's pretty expensive for something that doesn't have much content. The second smaller issue is that it's too hard to swap into and out of. I can just sit down at my computer and instantly get into something, but switching to VR takes effort.

The price can probably be solved over time, assuming we keep making VR hardware. The convenience is harder. I don't think there's a solution to that, at least not in the near future.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

The convenience is harder. I don’t think there’s a solution to that, at least not in the near future.

lighter headsets that work well in MR, so you don't need to take it off to reply to a msg or find your login. you'd leave it on in mixed/augmented reality mode, then swap it back to VR to play your game.

Slowly, we're moving towards that. I'll be very interested to see what comes after the quest 3s / index etc.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Something I wanted to do when I had my Vive working, and I'm unsure if this is actually possible, is integrate the android watch OS into it. It'd be so nice to always have quick access to your device that is integrated into the VR space. I'm not sure why someone hasn't done this yet (assuming they haven't).

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I know a startup tried to do phone reflection in VR, that is, to mirror a phone's display into a render layer, and try to use the phone's touchscreen as an input for that 'display'.

they went out of business. I wonder if they ever got their patents figured out. seemed like promising tech.

[-] Poik@pawb.social 6 points 13 hours ago

You can now get refurbished for around $200. Mostly the meta quest 2. I'd be happier with something that isn't meta affiliated, but it's a solid headset. Considering how expensive most of the rest are, getting it down this far is pretty good. Maybe in a decade, there will be more entry headsets at this price point or lower.

Convenience: meta has hand tracking as controllers and can play games by itself so you only need to put the headset on, and theirs is much lighter than the old vives I cut my VR teeth on. The head strap isn't great still for convenience, but there are third party straps that are much easier to put on and take off. The framework for convenient VR is there, but support is dwindling as there's not much money in the VR market compared to the cost vs anything else in games.

I hate that most of this is about meta, but I haven't seen anyone else really making great strides in VR. There's a Chinese company I need to find again which apparently made super light headsets I was going to keep an eye on and forgot.

[-] ggppjj@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Unfortunately, my understanding is that Meta's offerings are so cheap because they're making a loss on the hardware to undercut competitors that don't have the resources or desire to do the same.

[-] Poik@pawb.social 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't see them turning a profit on the market after killing their competitors. I don't get their angle. Unless they can offer something truly transformative, they're going to put themselves out of business doing that.

But yeah, they have this all in on VR/AR mentality which I don't see working out. Killing the competition does guarantee no one else makes a good product either.

[-] ggppjj@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Eh, I think they also really have an infinite money pump with all of their worldwide products. I don't think they would be able to hold out if VR were more widespread and actually became a market that big players were entering instead of dipping into and then exiting, but with the market the way it is, for people that don't have powerful enough standalone computers to back them up... They're the only product that truly could become the standard as of now. Even if you have a PC capable of running desktop VR, the Quest 2 is incredibly attractive with a reasonably good wifi router and steam link. "And if you have a Quest anyways, you definitely gotta re-buy beat saber because what if I go out to a hotel and wanna play, and hey look this game that I wanted on PC was on sale" and so on.

I say this as the owner of an index and a quest.

[-] Poik@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, but I don't think they'll keep it unless it turns a profit. Meta as a whole will always have ads which literally print money for free, but they'll Google the VR line as soon as their lizard overlord gets bored of the metaverse idea. Maybe they'll sell it instead of close it like Google always does, actually... That would be nice.

I am being somewhat exaggerative with word choices.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

capitalism <3

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, I had a Vive. The lighthouses have failed now so it's not currently usable, and I didn't use it frequently and am now on Linux and haven't looked into if VR will work for me now, so I haven't gotten a replacement. I've thought about it though. It sucks that even I, who has used VR and enjoyed it, doesn't currently feel the need to have a working headset.

Im going to look into a used headset and support on my device though. I might get back into it.

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

I get what you are saying but your entire post dances around the actual problem. All of this is fine if there was actually good software. Ive yet to see any killer app or must have software. If there were really good games it would make the hardware short comings less important. Even apple with their typically polished experiences seems to have just dumped their headset on the market and hope for the best.

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 3 points 10 hours ago

I mean there are, it's all just extremely subjective.

Pistol Whip is musical John wick simulator, with community made levels. This is pretty much the pinnacle, IMO it's better than beatsaber which is a little more boring for me. Then there's the story based and multiplayer based FPS games, alongside the rhythm ones. Arizona Sunshine, Superhot.

There's Vermillion, which is a VR painting simulator. It's incredible as an artist with a small space and not having to clean up afterwards. There's also SculptrVR for modeling, SynthVR for music (synthesizers) which IMO is actually a quintessential piece of software as an actual synthesis rig is thousands of dollars, rooms full of space, and in this game it's all available to you. There are a number of other games depending on your hobby preferences.

And then there's space/relaxation simulators, on their own are great, but can be further enhanced with various software. For example, one of my favorite passtimes during lockdown was Elite Dangerous with my phone connected to my computer using SCRCPY, brought into VR as an overlay. So I was space trucking with Netflix and didn't have to remove my headset to interact on my phone.

And then there's murder simulators like Gorn and Blade and Sorcery, which also is the best Star Wars simulator.

So even your post doesn't hit the problem on the head. There's a few compounding issues.

First and foremost - the cost of the device in tandem with the lack of publicity. It's no question that Blade and Sorcery and Beatsaber are well known VR games, but neither of them are marketed very well by their teams. Understandably so, how much ad money is worth putting into a VR game. But it's hardly marketed by the headset sellers themselves, which you would think would be something desirable.

Second - the reality. Headsets are heavy. Moving is hot. Even if you do get your VR setup, really fun games translated to VR like Holoball (basically just racketball) can actually get you pretty sweaty. The other reality is space is a factor. Even though I have a smaller house I still got VR, but using it in a smaller house can be compromising.

Third - back to marketing, but with subjectivity. I would argue that there is killer software out there worth making VR worth having, the issue is that no one knows about it. Know one knows that SynthVR exists and let's you save hundreds of thousands of dollars if you want to play with synthesizers without having to purchase all the parts for racks. Vermillion is incredible for aspiring painters and regular artists who may be low on materials or space, or I'mOpenBrush if they're looking for the 3D VR art side.

Finally - VR has a really difficult time with multiplayer. Without it, longevity can be shortened. With it, there might be no longevity at all because the game cost $20 and the headset and the cost of the PC that can run it and no one has even heard of Revolv3r. So while some games like PavlovVR somewhat takeoff and are successful, other games might have you waiting in a lobby for forever. Additionally, after the Vive there was a bit of a falloff of developer interest, and so there're a fair number of games from 2016-2017 which look promising but are entirely abandoned, or might not even work on modern headsets (not so much an issue anymore now that Microsoft is ending support for Reality Portal.) This makes it even harder to find games for VR since you're effectively sorting through a graveyard with a mix between hardware compatibility and something actually worthwhile.

There are a ton of fun VR games, fully fledged and arcade style, and there's a lot of great software. I just don't think people know about them, they're hard to find, and they're a bit locked behind a pretty significant price disparity.

[-] Poik@pawb.social 2 points 4 hours ago

Well said. Also, good suggestions. I haven't tried a few of those.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

My comment they were replying to didn't touch this, so they weren't responding to that. However, I disagree we need some "killer app" to make adoption more likely. It'd be great, but I don't see it happening. There's nothing really that is done in VR that can't also be on traditional displays. The advantage is immersion. It just has to be at a price that people find worth it.

People, especially companies, don't like talking about this because it's "obscene" or something, but, like so many things, I think porn is the way to sell VR. It gives an experience that, while still available in traditional formats, is quite different. It's not a "killer app" but does provide distinct advantages not seen anywhere else.

[-] Poik@pawb.social 2 points 4 hours ago

Thank you. Also, kind of fair, but the library probably needs to be bigger before people are willing to adopt too.

I always kind of thought a good desktop system, where wearing the headset is cheaper than getting a new larger monitor or more monitors, but the long term comfort of wearing a headset instead kills that idea pretty strongly right now. Even just a theater experience is kinda meh.

Porn does tend to sell technological advances though.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 46 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

It's also what got me to finally go linux full-time.

I had tried to a couple times before, but always ran into one too many snags.

When the deck was announced I thought to myself "that can't work with every game, can it?" as I'd attempted that myself.

But I had to see for myself, and the improvements in proton were staggering. And it's gotten even better since! Who would have though Apex Legends, Hunt Showdown, and a bunch of other holdouts and anti-cheat games would be running on linux within a year of the deck releasing?

[-] rain_worl@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago

it's the year of linux on the toilet!

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 49 points 23 hours ago

In the early days I thought it would be some niche gimmick that would never take off. Turns out it wasn't and it's the best handheld gaming machine ever made.

It feels good to be wrong!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 74 points 1 day ago

I love this so much. It reminds me of how AMD Threadripper came to be.

Apparently Threadripper was a skunkworks project by some of the engineers at AMD that they worked on in their spare time. They wanted to see if they could basically slap together a bunch of normal CPU dyes into on mega chip with a high speed/bandwidth interposer connecting them together.

It was almost abandoned and they had to fight to get it taken seriously. But it proved to be a viable product, and singlehandedly was responsible for decimating what was left of Intel's place in the HEDT market so badly, that after several years of failed attempts to keep up, Intel officially announced that they wouldn't be competing in that space anymore.

It's such a cool thing when talented and passionate people come together without having to be subject to strict marketability and just try to create something awesome and revolutionary.

The Steam Deck kicked off an entire new market for handheld gaming devices that had real power to play modern PC games. And despite a bunch of competing and copycat products, the Steam Deck is still king.

I love mine, have close to 200 hours on it, which for me is a ton. I've barely gamed on my main PC in the last year, it's just so much more comfortable to play on the couch or in my bed.

[-] Player2@lemm.ee 13 points 19 hours ago

It's just too bad that AMD is also not competing in the HEDT space now, leaving no reasonable options whatsoever

[-] RacerX@lemm.ee 11 points 18 hours ago

While you're all here what controller do you use for your deck? Been thinking of getting one of the hall effect 8bitdo ones, but I'm open to trying anything.

[-] Backlog3231@reddthat.com 21 points 18 hours ago

Why would you use a controller with the steam deck? It is a controller.

[-] RacerX@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago

I use it in a dock most of the time.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I got a PS5 controller from a sale, even the touchpad works

[-] Sheltr@lemm.ee 7 points 16 hours ago

OG steam controllers for me!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
554 points (100.0% liked)

Steam Deck

14719 readers
663 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS