974
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 191 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, more Palestinians will die

Sure, Ukrainians will die

Sure, US minorities will die

Sure, the entire world will suffer from a fascist demagogue at the head of the most powerful country in the world

But have you considered that, for a few brief moments of time, ~~we created a lot of value for the shareholders~~ we got to feel smug over the SHITLIBS who wanted to prevent fascism?

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 67 points 3 weeks ago

Ahh, but you see, you disagreed with Stalin that one time, and therefore you were the fascist all along

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago

As I believe in the abolition of capitalism and the creation of a popular base of support for such a measure, instead of a narrow oligarchy oppressing the proletariat and enforcing its will on society, I am a shitlib. It's a terrible burden to bear. 😔

[-] socsa@piefed.social 19 points 3 weeks ago

Correct, my harm reduction framework is much more violent than your harm reduction framework, and is therefore more interesting, which makes you wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] socsa@piefed.social 60 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's honestly such a shockingly privileged position it almost defies belief that anyone could actually be so dense unless they are operating in bad faith. Yes, there are several serious problems in the world, and absolutely none of them are solved by helping the US slip into fascism. Leftists in particular are supposed to hate fascists, so I can't imagine how anyone with leftist sympathies could possibly want to see what the world looks like with an unrestrained Trunp at the helm. Again, unless they are so privileged they don't think the consequences would affect them personally, in which case I would call any other profession of external empathy which they might bleet ad nauseum, as questionably sincere.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 26 points 3 weeks ago

They don’t think the consequences will touch them. They’re the leftist equivalent of “shitlibs”

[-] logos@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 weeks ago

But what else am I gonna do with my feelings of impotent rage? Try to actually change something?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 51 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They are either Russian trolls or children who have a Disney level perspective on politics, I think. They don't want to recognize that they have very limited options or the harsh realities surrounding them.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 51 points 3 weeks ago

I got into this argument the other day. People’s arrogance and lack of common sense was disappointing.

load more comments (58 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 49 points 3 weeks ago

It's almost like the current and immediate conflict between Israel and Palestinians isn't the singular thing that the world should have serious concern about, and that realistic solutions to longstanding international diplomacy issues are - wait for it - hard.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago

But hard things are hard and involve complexity and nuance! I'd much rather call people racist, spout a simplistic solution and call it a day.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 25 points 3 weeks ago

You forgot to smugly pat yourself on the back!

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 weeks ago

Ongoing genocide is at the top of my "what I'm concerned about" list. If it isn't for you, maybe you should reflect on that a little

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 24 points 3 weeks ago

Which one?

  • North Korea
  • Myanmar
  • Bangladesh and India
  • China
  • Hamas and Israel
  • Ethiopia
  • Democratic Republic of Congo

Or is it only what Israel is doing, and only your concern because you can use it as propaganda to tweak the 2024 presidential election in the US?

[-] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 weeks ago

The one that is made possible by my tax dollars

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 16 points 3 weeks ago

So definitely China, then, because it's super impossible for you to avoid products made there and exported to the US.

And fuck those people being genocided where your tax dollars aren't going, amirite?

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Some people think an administration and a party that out right lies about a genocide happening care about them. If someone in a position of power, not only ignore but also support clear evidence of genocide and keep repeating statement that means nothing, they are either agent for a foreign country "AIPAC" or they are in it for themselves and have zero care for poor people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

It really depends on which state you live in whether or not you have the luxury of a protest vote. If you live in NY state that has a 20% lead for Harris, sure, some people can vote Jill Stein or something. But if you live in a state that actually might be close or not an obvious blowout, you can't vote that way. You actually have to be tactical with your vote, not idealistic or symbolic.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Cleggory@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

Everyone who doesn't support a corporatist duopoly is lazy, dumb, and/or working for the geopolitical rival to my dominant hegemonic country!

One can only wonder why you have not convinced more people with your message and Harris is now losing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] n_emoo@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 weeks ago

Let me take a stab at this. As a non American non voter who is interested in the outcome of the election.

There are 3 parties to this discussion: the Harris campaign (Democrats in general), the Gaza issue voter, and the lesser evil voters.

The Gaza issue voters clearly believe a genocide is occuring, sometimes affecting them personally, and funded by their tax dollars. They would like some concessions from the Dems (the only likely party to take any action) and their only bargaining chip is their vote. It is clear to me that, if a large number of Americans felt strongly and this way, action would happen.

The Harris campaign has been non responsive on this issue, trying to tread the thin line, where they not only look powerless politically, but also unwilling to take a moral stand for what is right.

The lesser evil voters are absolutely correct that she is still better than Trump, and in more ways than just Middle east.

What I think all 3 parties need to do:

The lesser evil camp, instead of mocking the hold outs, needs to pressure the Harris campaign to make a change. Maybe even join them! (See the last point)

The Harris campaign, needs to think long and hard about what they stand for, and the implications of the Republican-lite gamble paying off. There needs to be some fear of losing voters who they cannot take for granted as they shift to the right.

Finally the Gaza voters. Its fine to play the game of chicken, keep screaming as loud as you can demanding change, but ultimately (secretly) get to the ballot and vote D.

[-] Nunar@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

This is complete trash. There are not 3 issue voters here. There are two. A non-vote for Harris is a full vote for greater support for genocide. A vote for Harris has a chance to change that. Any other thoughts on it are completely ridiculous.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 weeks ago

Pretty sure people are gonna die regardless of which genocidal wacko is elected.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

A large portion of the people you're referring to are Arab Americans. In fact, Trump is now leading with them. I also think Trump would be worse for Palestinians than Harris, but I doubt the best way to convince Arab Americans of that is with condescending memes about how they don't care about the Middle East.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Dem centrists are too lazy to try to influence their politicians to do the right thing. And they pretend the politician is powerless to change their stand. They can change their stand. You can apply pressure during an election. if you'd just try. But you all pretend you are powerless, and then call everyone trying to pressure harris shitty names.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago

Usually they live in blue states that will partially insulate them from the consequences. Or they’re young and don’t understand knock on effects yet.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
974 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5432 readers
2385 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS