861

Trump judge releases 1,889 pages of election interference evidence against the former president (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I assume the story itself will be updated as they go through those thousands of pages

See the documents below

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/united-states-v-trump/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

(page 2) 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is like 1,800 blank/redacted pages.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Why the downvotes? Look at it.

[-] humblebun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago

He won't be doing the same again, right?

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well if he does, we can all take comfort our justice system will prosecute him at their nearest convenience.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

If this is the case, how in the fuck is the Orange Turd still on the ballot? The bastard will repeat the BS, but with more violence.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Would love to see him release his medical records or tax returns

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Business Insider - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Business Insider:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-judge-release-additional-evidence-election-interference-case-2024-10

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

load more comments

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024

861 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers

2170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News