1412
The 1900s (mander.xyz)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BanjoShepard@lemmy.world 249 points 3 months ago

A few years ago, I started a sentence in my class with "When I was born". A student instantly chimed in and said "What in the 19's?" And I thought in my head, of course you idiot, everybody is born in the 19's. It still haunts me.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 223 points 3 months ago

The scary part is that this comic is 15 years old.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 75 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Updated hover text: "I'm teaching every 22-year-old relative to say this, and every 28-year-old to do the same thing with Toy Story. Also, Pokemon hit the US two and a half decades ago and kids born after Aladdin came out will turn 32 next year."

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 145 points 3 months ago

I mean, tbf that was admittedly last millennium.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 91 points 3 months ago

Over a quarter century ago!

God I feel old.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

TBF, the veracity of the information is relatively field dependent. Structural engineering? Yeah, probably still as relevant as the day it was published... Quantum computing or astrobiology theory? Far more likely to be superseded or debunked.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I want to see AI papers compared to today, we basically tore the guts out of everything, I don't even think most of Minsky is applicable anymore (perceptrons particularly have been replaced with vector meshes from word2vec).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I have a backpack that's over a quarter of a century old. Which I got new, and have been using actively for that time. Great fucking backpack.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 128 points 3 months ago

My dad told me recently, when he started practicing medicine the old people with heart failures he was treating were often born in the late 1800s, but now those are all dead, and the people he's treating are more likely to have a birth years that are around 1940-1950. Which is also starting to become uncomfortably close to his own, 1960.

[-] chetradley@lemmy.world 60 points 3 months ago

A given person's definition of "old" is usually about 15 years older than they are. My boss is 65 and calls 70 year olds "young".

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 months ago

When I started using dating apps I found 24 year olds too old. I still have that impression memorized but it's wild.

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 months ago

Welp, I don't know when from the memory is, but I do vividly remember thinking about how damn old those 14/15 year old 9th graders are. Could be 1st grade.

Basically as if the life ended at 20, and they were soon to retire.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Cause as you get older, you realize that a lot of the hype about people being "old" is manufactured. I'm closing in on 30 and I'm squarely in a zone I thought was "old" when I was 18. But I feel like I still have my whole life ahead of me. And despite a lot of fear mongering, I still feel healthy and ready for anything.

And although I definitely feel like 45 is pretty old, I know that when my parents were that age they were scoffing and telling me "45 is not that old". I'm sure when I'm 60 I'll be looking at retirement and think about how it's actually not too bad to be 60 and it's the 80 year olds that are really old.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 98 points 3 months ago

I'm Gen-X, 51, and this doesn't sting too much...so like whatever. I do feel for Millenials and the elder Gen-Z though.

Imagine being Gen-Z out to buy some beer, you pull out your ID, the cashier barely glances at it and runs your credit card. You smugly say, "I guess you don't really check ID since you didn't really look at the date." The cashier responds, "I did. I saw the nineteen." Ooooff.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 50 points 3 months ago

it's an odd feeling to be gatekept from beer by someone who's younger than the stretch marks & grey hairs on my body and; yet; it makes me feel good to be carded nonetheless somehow.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

it's an odd feeling to be gatekept from beer by someone who's younger than the stretch marks & grey hairs on my body...

*slow clap*
Amazing. One of the best sentences I have read all year.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 63 points 3 months ago

One day, there will only be a handful of people from the 19 hundreds left

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

The oldest person who ever lived so far made it to 122, so by 2123 they'll almost certainly all be gone.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

This is just intentionally phrased poorly to create a rise out of people. It's like referring to water as "dihydrogen monoxide".

[-] spookedintownsville@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago
[-] woodenskewer@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

I put this on an unlabeled squirt bottle once at work. It was wrong to do because technically it's an OSHA violation for being improperly labeled because it was just in sharpie and not a standard label. But it was night shift I was bored and the bottle was already unlabeled so it was already out of compliance. Why not write on it?

A week or so later I heard people talking about this squirt bottle that said dihydrogen monoxide. Two safety guys were there so I didn't take credit for my shenanigans based on the reception not being great.

I said I think it's just water, but the chemical name. Ya know? Nope, they didn't get it. The kind of doubled down and started talking about things in that link because they "researched the name" and it was actually harmful.

It was a strange experience.

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

How so? I would certainly call something from 1894 to be from the "late 1800s' or late 19th century. I mean, we're a quarter of the way through this century, at some point it turns into history.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VerilyFemme 50 points 3 months ago

To use a quote from the later part of the 1900s:

Time keeps on slippin' into the future.

[-] Mwallerby@startrek.website 41 points 3 months ago

To use another from the very late 1900s

The years start comin' and they don't stop comin'

[-] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 3 months ago

Definitely one of the songs of the very late 1900s.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 47 points 3 months ago

I mean, sure, fair, it IS late 1900's, but...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 3 months ago

Reading that just broke my hip.

[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 39 points 3 months ago

I regularly say "from the 20th century" when I want to emphasize the age, the irrelevance, of my lack of knowledge of something.

I don't know crap about cars, so sometimes, someone would ask me about an old one or something and I'd say "not sure, mid-20th century I think".

It's a funny way to talk about it and it almost masks the fact I just tried to get away with a 25-year window.

Although in a more rude manner I'll also say I don't care about some 20th century movie or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It seems awkward to me to refer to the previous century that way until you're at least halfway through the next century. Even then, that's pushing it. Basically I think that way of referring to an era implies you're over, or at least fairly close to, 100 years away from it.

[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

Students are often awkward

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 months ago

Early 2000's doesn't sound odd at all though.

[-] Bubs12@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

Because that’s referring the 2000’s decade. In terms of centuries, I would say we are still in the early 2000’s and that does feel odd to say.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 3 months ago

From the last millennium

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 33 points 3 months ago

I feel old and I wasn't even born on the 1900s

[-] Gormadt 30 points 3 months ago

I suddenly feel like the crypt keeper

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

What a strange and dumb question.

Or, you know, not real.

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is a perfectly acceptable question in a science course. Just because you don't have the experience, knowledge, or, barring those two, even just the imagination to understand how a question might apply doesn't make it strange or dumb. It does speak volumes about you, though.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 15 points 3 months ago

Exactly. Citing a psychology paper from 1912 is risky business. Young people don't know precisely when each particular science caught up to the current paradigm.

[-] firebarrage@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Is it though? I definitely had teachers in middle/high school with oddball requirements like "only physical books more than 10 years old are valid sources". Total nonsense but it does happen. College is a place where you are meant to have these bad assumptions challenged and corrected. Presumably after a response they'll be better for it.

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

Nothing ever happens.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Isn't this an actual thing? Pretty sure I was told by some instructor not to use references older than a decade or two. Unless the subject is very elementary older sources are more likely to be obsolete

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 37 points 3 months ago

Depends on the subject. Historians use a lot older materials more regularly for obvious reasons.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

TTT... no matter how much we don't like to admit it.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 19 points 3 months ago

Someone left me a reply just yesterday with that date format. At first I was going to reply back that they must have made a typo, but then realized they weren't wrong. Ouch.

[-] running_ragged@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I started a sentence in my class with “When I was born”. A student instantly chimed in and said “What in the 19’s?” And I thought in my head, of course you idiot, everybody is born in the 19’s. It still haunts me

It still feels wrong to me, to see it written out, but spoken its different.

I feel like it works to go with say, the 1600's, which I read naturally as the 16 hundreds. But when I see 1900 I read that as the nineteen naughts, (aughts?) because so often when people are referring to periods in the 19 hundreds, its down to the decade because so much changed between each one. Or maybe I just felt that way because I'm so old now.

Maybe in another 25 years, it'll be far enough away that 1900's becomes 19 hundreds in my head.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 months ago

I just pulled my back and broke my hips reading this, it made me feel so old 👴🏻

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

This is stupid. We're 24% through the 2000's. Get over it. How thin is your skin?

[-] KrankyKong@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

It's hyperbole, yo. It's just funny because people born in the previous century don't really think of it as that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
1412 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11972 readers
1952 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS