101
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

Thought you guys already got your own chips.

[-] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 6 points 22 hours ago

They have both shrimp and pork flavor.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago
[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago

So don't use Intel brand shit 🤷

Sounds like sino manipulation of publicly traded companies to me. Very on brand.

[-] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If Intel happens to potentially go under by losing China, the US government coming in would be convenient for both parties.

So Intel's in a funny position where they can actually pressure China for more economic incentives like subsidies or tax breaks

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Look it up. The latest generation of Intel chips have incredibly egregious issues.

If you think you’re owning the Chinese by supporting Intel, you’re very misguided. Instead, you should be hoping for RISC-V to catch on because closed architectures are vastly more vulnerable to exploitation. They represent an unknown tech stack which is a no-no for anyone who actually values freedom, privacy, and liberty. They also cost tens of millions to create while RISC-V costs significantly less since it doesn’t require a company to buy a million dollar license to build on a closed architecture.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

The architecture being open source or not has nothing to do with security. All high performance risc-v cpu designs are proprietary. The instruction set itself is open source, but beyond that you have as much visibility into the internals of the processor as you would with an Intel one. The only thing the license impacts is that you can legally make your own risc-v processor if you want, whereas tou can’t make your own x86 processor if you want (legally).

[-] demesisx@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago

Thanks for setting me straight. I’ll still be pushing the idea of RISC-V.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Plus Intel supports Apartheid Israel. Both the company and their tech don't support freedom, privacy, or liberty

[-] Soluna 6 points 1 day ago

Legitimately back when I chose my CPU and I was debating between the Intel i9 14900K and the AMD 7950x3D, my final decision to go with AMD came down to this because at the time their specs seemed almost identical. And based on the more recent news about the 14 series, I absolutely made the right decision! 🇵🇸

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

No, I get that. The statement from them makes it seem like retaliation for Huawei being banned in the US though. They have their own shitty x86 chips they apparently don't seem psyched to use instead as well.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
101 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58743 readers
2733 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS