339
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] KillingAndKindess 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Executives report that they have finally finished the number crunching that has been the topic of discussion for weeks now regarding the new budget changes. One board member told us "The nerds in accounting kept complaining about how many expense reports we've been sending lately. After looking into it, we've found a rapid uptick in hitman related expenditure." Confirming recent suspicions that vendors did take note of the recent demand increases and decided on a market adjustment industry-wide. Our source did not confirm that these new layoffs were due to the investigation results, but inside rumor is saying that's the case.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Layoffs: that one weird trick to solve all business problems, the working class hates it!

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Business Actuary: "So you fired all the superfluous VPs and middle managers, right?"

Boeing HR, drawing a big red line through the Quality Control and Safety Assessment departments

Actuary: "Right?!"

[-] Breve@pawb.social 20 points 1 month ago

I understand the actual market reasons that buybacks and layoffs raise a stock price, but it's always been counter-intuitive to me that shrinking the workforce that actually produces the capital and divesting money that could have been used to grow the company would be seen as positive indicators to investors.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

There is a strategy, pioneered by the old GE C-levels, of spinning out operations and outsourcing departments in such a way that your real business is simply accumulating rent-generating properties. Rather than operating a factory that makes light bulbs or turbine fans, you own the factory and lease it to a smaller and less profitable company that actually runs it. Rather than paying engineers to design the next iteration of airframe, you look for a small company of draftsmen that has a new airframe and buy it, then fire all the draftsmen and license the specs on the airframe design the company owns.

When you have very cheap borrowing costs and you can identify instances in which start-up companies paid their employees below the market rate for their cutting edge work, you can find huge arbitrage opportunities. Take none of the risk of a tentative project, turn the owner of the company into a mega-millionaire overnight, and dispense with the labor costs associated with professionals.

Over the long term, this destroys the base of knowledge you need to make iterative improvements to any of the shit you're now leasing out to third parties. So you're stuck with a more traditional air frame for decades, you straight up lose the ability to produce wide body jets like the DC-10, and the folks you outsourced all the real physical labor have no long-term interest in quality control since everyone knows they're disposable.

But by the time that moment rolls around, you've made yourself a billionaire several times over and diversified your portfolio out of your own company's stock. You're untouchable and its someone else's problem to deal with a company coasting on fumes and broken promises.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Here's the real story. Those few years of near zero lending got corps hooked on the Yellen yayo and they ain't been right since. Now the only option is somehow to gut your operation expenses to offset your batshit crazy capex.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Because many investors can't see past the next quarterly report. Value investing is hard and requires homework.

[-] TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Social Responsibility is not only making your workers build houses for the poor, it's having enough cash in hand to take care of them when times are harder.

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
339 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

10028 readers
220 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS