56
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by XraySonoCol@med-mastodon.com to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

UK Labour are too Tory for me.
I've threatened that they've lost my vote. (edit)
On LGBTQIA, specifically trans rights.
On their plans for the NHS.
On their plans for health and wealth inequalities in the UK.
On their plans for the relationship the UK has with Europe.
They have to be less Tory to get my vote back.
It's not acceptable that to not vote Tory, we have to settle for what they offer. They assume their position is acceptable.
If they correct their position, I'll reconsider
@uk_politics

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] C4d@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good”

Labour and the Tories are not the same. The purpose of the narrative that they are is to foster and maintain voter apathy.

[-] barontomatoes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Labour and the Tories are not the same

No, they're not. But that doesn't make them good. Less bad, perhaps, but good is a stretch.

The purpose of the narrative that they are is to foster and maintain voter apathy.

Voters are apathetic because they rarely (if ever) get to vote for something, usually it's voting to stop something/somebody else.

[-] C4d@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree that voting these days seems to be about “holding one’s nose” and picking the party most likely to stop something.

I blame FPTP.

At the moment, if you’re right-leaning there’s essentially just one party of note but if you’re left-leaning you’ve got some choices.

With PR, I believe more people would be able to just vote for what they want to see.

[-] XraySonoCol@med-mastodon.com 3 points 1 year ago

@C4d Only if people fail to see that there are multiple narratives, which include telling Labour I require they change under threat of no vote. They like others know not of my intention, the cost to them is clear, a lost vote, which is what they require. They earn my vote, they work for it. Hopefully ppl who are dissatisfied will see that another way exists and instead demand better, not to succumb to their own apathetic thought processes.

[-] C4d@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think this argument (and your voting “power”, or at least your ability to directly influence the direction of a political party) would work better in a PR rather than FPTP system.

At the moment, losing your vote may or may not cost anyone anything if you’re among a demographic that consistently votes one way or the other.

If you had time on your hands, you could join the local representation of the party of your choice and begin to influence it that way. Unfortunately, not all demographic groups have the luxury of free time.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a good summary of Labour's actual policy positions, which are very different from your characterisation of them. You obviously have the right to vote for whoever you want to, for whatever reasons, but it's better to root your behaviour in reality, not rhetoric.

[-] noodle@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago

Thank you! It's actually worrying how much people seem to be basing their idea of what party policy will be on soundbites they've heard.

This country is in dire need of some political literacy. Thinking that the Tories and Lib Dems are somehow better on LGBQT issues than Labour would be hilarious if it wasn't a damning indictment of the intelligence of British voters.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Would you be able to unlock the article for us by any chance? 🙏

[-] noodle@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

Search for it on archive.is

If you're on Firefox you can add a filter for paywalls to uBlock Origin.

[-] XraySonoCol@med-mastodon.com 4 points 1 year ago

@frankPodmore Unfortunately the pay wall prevents others from seeing this. I've read the entire article via the link given and it doesn't address several of my points, so I'm not clear which policy positions you're referring to.
In fact the opening paragraph agrees with me:
"It has been said that in sidelining the Labour party’s Corbynite left wing and manoeuvring it towards the centre, Sir Keir Starmer has made the UK opposition barely distinguishable in tone from the governing Conservatives."

[-] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago

No, it doesn't agree with you. Really basic reading comprehension error, there. It says people have said that, not that it is true. It spends the following 600 words demolishing that case.

[-] noodle@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

Paywalls are easily circumvented. This isn't a good excuse.

For the uninitiated; Copy the article address and paste it into the search bar on archive.is. There are multiple paywall bypass methods, this is just one.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Garfvynneve@feddit.uk 19 points 1 year ago

You don't vote FOR a party in a first past the post system. You tactivally vote against.

[-] XraySonoCol@med-mastodon.com 3 points 1 year ago

@Garfvynneve What I tell them I'm planning to do doesn't have to match with what I'll actually do.
We all can do this to demand better.

[-] Overzeetop@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

The Torys thank you for your abstention, and look forward to enacting policies which enrich themselves at your expense.

[-] XraySonoCol@med-mastodon.com 3 points 1 year ago

@Overzeetop That's another way of accusing me of being a Tory enabler. The point being as I have said elsewhere, is that what I tell labour I will do and what I do, are not their or anyone else's concern.
In the meantime I can lobby for policy change in any way I see fit, as can anyone else, in a democracy as it currently stands.
It isn't a simple dichotomy, despite FPTP.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ThePyroPython@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

Can you vote tactically for Lib Dem or Greens without risking more votes going to the Tories?

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 6 points 1 year ago

Fuck the Lib Dems, even tactically.

[-] ThePyroPython@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago

Mate, we're under a first past the post system, tactical voting matters to get the most damaging political force, i.e. the Tories, out of power and by a significant majority.

Anything remotely left of the Tories is better, even if it is Centre Centre Centre calling itself Left Labour.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

You students tried that in 2015 and got Megagiga Tory and in 2016 we left the EU. In 2017 and 2019 when the Lib Dems campaigned to stop Brexit and rejoin it was "they took rrrrr students loans!". 🙄

So yes, fuck them. Oh and whilst we're at it let's also hand power to two parties that will keep us out of the EU because they are scared of their voter base. Good job 👍.

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not a student, but let me ask you this as a supposed predecessor, why didn't you ensure younger generations didn't have to worry about politicians lying without consequence?

Oh and don't forget the Lib Dems are partially responsible for this mess. It may surprise you but I'm old enough to remember that. They're an untrustworthy party and no one owes them a vote because some person on the Internet wants to whitewash their recent history and guilt trip us into supporting them.

[-] teamonkey@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Trust and good will for the Lib Dems was destroyed in 2010, when they jumped into a coalition government with the Tories for the tiniest sniff of power, despite their manifesto being closer to Labour’s on paper, backtracking on many of their policies and outright failing on others.

https://theguardian.com/politics/2015/apr/15/how-much-of-the-liberal-democrats-2010-election-manifesto-was-implemented

[-] teamonkey@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Tactically speaking, you can vote for the party you want to win only if you are absolutely certain that a) the tories have such a strong majority there isn’t a chance of anyone else getting in; b) some other party has such a majority there isn’t a chance of the Tories getting in. Otherwise you vote for the non-Tory party (or party that will not ally with the Tories) that is most likely to make it in your area.

I still vote tactically because there have historically been some close results where I live, but I’m sick of voting for parties I don’t want to win. I decided to become a member of the political party that I felt I was in most in line with, despite the fact I rarely vote for them. Small gesture, I know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

As far as I'm concerned, the worst case scenario (by a very large margin) is another Tory government. I'll be doing everything I can this side of campaigning for Labour (my MP is Labour and he's alright, my local councillors are also Labour and active and all the ball, but I can't bring myself to actual promote a party who's policies I struggle to endorse). So that's mainly sending out tactical voting information and offering lifts to the polling stations.

[-] XraySonoCol@med-mastodon.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@Emperor I agree, Tory is worst. I don't have to let a not good enough Labour think they are good enough.
Recall I *told* Labour they lost my vote, that doesn't mean I can't exercise my vote in any way that effectively gets the Tories out, which includes actually voting for Labour.

[-] guriinii@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Same. Their acceptance of current Tory actions like not revoking new oil and gas licenses and child benefit cap. Also watering down their own environmental policy. These things in our current situation are inexcusable.

They pander to Tory voters, bigots, and stay on the side of big business and the media.

The Greens have my vote.

[-] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

UK Labour are too Tory for me.

Absolutely right.

It doesn't matter who you vote for now. I don't think it ever has (except perhaps in 1945). Social change in this country happens outside parliamentary politics. One of the big lies that we've allowed to become accepted is that changes to society happen as a result of MPs debating in parliament. They don't.

Westminster politics is an entertainment used to distract us from taking action .

[-] rayquetzalcoatl@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago
[-] Xophmeister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The Overton Window has shifted so far to the right, any “more progressive” party that has a chance of getting into power kinda has to play to the crowd. It’ll take time for it to shift back to a more “familiar” (centre) left.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3091 readers
94 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS