472
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 280 points 1 month ago

What with the weird freebooting article? This ‘article’ is just a description of Alec’s video with the clickbait cranked up to ten. Gotta love a major corporation using small creators’ work for free ad revenue…

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 165 points 1 month ago

You could add the link so people don't contribute to ad revenue if you feel strongly! https://youtu.be/zsA3X40nz9w 💜

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

EDIT: That was an undeservedly harsh phrasing. The matter touched a nerve, but that's not OPs fault. I'll clarify, but leave the original comment at the end for transparency.

I'm not a fan of videos and much prefer having texts to read. I find them more comfortable to process, interrupt, resume, search for a specific section and consume while not on WiFi (due to a limited data plan, which YT tends to eat through).

Both professionally and privately, I have been frustrated by the number of tutorials and guides that are presented as videos where articles would work well enough. They seem to be more popular too, to the point that useful articles are buried deeper in the results.

I like textual summaries of interesting videos, because I'm curious, but often not enough to warrant clicking a YouTube link. I understand people's frustration with AI ripoffs stealing content, but if the original content creator doesn't cater to a textual medium, then someone else steps into that gap, I don't feel like it's so much ripping off as adapting to a different medium.

If the original creator offered a textual summary, and someone stole that to sell it as their own, I'd share the frustration. But if they didn't, you can't really steal what never existed.

Not that I'm a fan of AI slop specifically, but it's better than nothing. If I can't have a human one, I'd rather have an AI transcription than be excluded.

Sorry about my rudeness. This is a sore spot, but being snarky doesn't help anyone.

Original comment below


Does someone have a content description so I can read instead of having to watch it?

Oh wait, here's an article, nevermind.

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

For anyone that couldn't bother reading the above comment, I've given a summary...

hurrrrr I'm incapable of engaging the point people are making.

[-] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, it's about me not being able to arbitrarily sit down and watch a video due to various issues like attention span, hearing issues*, limited mobile data and being at work, where an article or summary is much easier and faster to read and can be interrupted at a moment's notice unlike a video which I'll have to pause, scrub back through if I missed a detail and wait for it to get to the right point, and I can more easily search for stuff.

My point is that there seems to be a habit of dismissing the value of textual summaries in favour of "just watch the video" in much of the online world, where I'll be looking for a quick explanation and get presented with some video instead. Some people don't do so well with videos so it's not "just" watching the video.

There are advantages to text that I hate seeing people ignore.

(Besides, how would you know I'm incapable rather than just unwilling; or why would you assume either in the first place instead of considering inability?)


* That issue applies to voice messages and phone calls too. While videos occasionally have good CC, I haven't found them to be reliable or ubiquitous enough. Additionally, they present the speech in fragments and usually are just as hard to search through. Either way, videos are a "sometimes" thing for me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Guess what you can also read? A transcript of the video dingus. Also there’s a source listed in the description, guess what it is? An article.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 41 points 1 month ago

I'm fairly sure that the image is even a screenshot from the video. Uncredited I notice.

[-] toynbee@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is, I just watched the video an hour or so ago.

edit: In fact, until I read this thread, I didn't notice the URL and thought this was a link to the video.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

That's enough YouTube videos just recapping an article. But I agree it's lazy

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago
[-] stellargmite@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I think they mean the same thing happens alot in reverse: YT vids about news articles. Not wrong, but whataboutist.

[-] cheeseburger@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

also not relevant to Alex's content either.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 162 points 1 month ago
[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

"Wait, is that a Duracell battery check?"

Oh man that transition. Chef's kiss. Amazing

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 107 points 1 month ago

But the video purports that normal people don’t really test batteries.

Yeah, it was a novelty that increased the price to manufacture and didn't actually add anything of value to users.

Either you put batteries in something and they worked or they didn't, and if they stopped working the next step is try different batteries whether or not the little gauge showed it had charge left.

Now if it was added to rechargeable batteries, it would be pretty useful because tou could do something with the knowledge of a battery being at 50%. But a lot of systems with rechargeable batteries have them built in and some other way to show remaining charge like a percentage on a screen.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

Now if it was added to rechargeable batteries, it would be pretty useful

I think the reason we haven't seen that is that NiMH rechargeables have fairly stable voltage during discharge while alkalines don't.

[-] Brokkr@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

I think all of your points were covered in the video, sometimes almost verbatim.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Neat!

I didn't bother watching the video, so I guess the reasons were pretty obvious.

[-] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago

I concur about rechargeables - it doesn't seem common for devices that take AA or AAA to have a battery gauge and it would be nice to be able to check the level on my rechargeables stock so I can know if I should top them off without needing to put each of them into the charger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

It was pretty useful as a kid for feeding my Gameboy and Game Gear with batteries I rescued from the junk drawers of friends and family. If they were low, I knew I had to save more often to avoid losing progress if they went dead while I was playing.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 78 points 1 month ago

I was a kid then, but I remember that I had to push so hard my fingers hurt... I used a multimeter.

[-] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Well the pros and cons of the multimeter are addresses in the video! He uses a meter on a dead battery and it still shows a deceptively reasonable voltage when not under load. The built-in tester draws more current.

[-] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

My technique is to use the 10a mode on the multimeter and check the battery. A full AA will do nearly 10 amps and dead ones much less. Careful with larger cells or rechargeables since you might blow the fuse in your meter.

[-] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

That sounds a little like testing matches "Yes, that one works. I mean: worked."

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] vxx@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago

It turned out that batteries randomly lying around are always empty. Functioning batteries are still in the device it's operating or in the box it was sold in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Toes@ani.social 40 points 1 month ago

This guy is great. He can make anything sound interesting.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 month ago

He makes everything sound interesting.

Ftfy

[-] dotslashme@infosec.pub 40 points 1 month ago

It broke too many thumbs.

[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago

He used old batteries, but I actually had new Duracell batteries with this feature very recently, in 2022 or so (Germany).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago

Did the power check work or was it snakeoil I remember trying to see it while hurting my hand.

[-] ilikecoffee@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

It did, see Technology Connections' latest video on it, he explains fully how it worked. Quite clever tbh.

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago

Although, he admits in the video to "faking" his footage of it working, by using a off-camera heat source. (His batteries were quite dead.)

But, as someone that lived through this time, they did work, as long as you pressed hard enough in the right places. It was hard to tell if the battery was dead or if you weren't pressing hard enough

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago

The video is in the article.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 month ago

It never went away. I have a duracell battery with power check sitting next to me on my desk

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] silentdon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Does anyone remember the battery testers that were built into the packaging? I think they were based on the same concept.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Asifall@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I have a really distinct memory of finding a bunch of these in a friend’s house when I was a kid and every one was empty. After watching the TC video I think it’s more likely I just wasn’t pressing hard enough and had no way to know that. Anyway, I can see why they stopped making them.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago

Yea, you have to press till it hurts, lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LinkMiguel@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I remember those.

Would be nice to have them on my 18650s

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

The voltage-to-capacity radio for lithium is much less linear compared to alkaline so it wouldn’t really work well :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It failed often enough that it wasn't all that useful. A cheap battery tester is better. And for 9volts you can also use the tongue test, lol (don't really though). My grandfather used to do that all the time.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
472 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59379 readers
3211 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS