258
That was quick rule (lemmy.nowsci.com)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com to c/196
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 93 points 9 months ago

Takes 4+ years to prosecute a popular, rich traitor. Takes one day to screw over poor people. Gotta love justice.

At least Trump got convicted in NY, I guess...

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 months ago

For now. Appeals court has been hinting that they may overturn verdict

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 88 points 9 months ago

cancelling student debt

OMG, what did student debt do?

[-] Changer098@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 9 months ago
[-] Spezi@feddit.org 27 points 9 months ago

So student debts are republican politicians, got it.

[-] Lennny@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Mine keeps yelling about hailing Marys and our fathers.

[-] 10_0@lemmy.ml 21 points 9 months ago

Prevent spending!

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 30 points 9 months ago

If only Republicans would stop holding younger generations hostage through student loans...

[-] PyroNeurosis 25 points 9 months ago

Who could have seen this coming? There was no way to prepare!

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No shit. I posted this on one of this first articles, where a commenter pointed out the headline was a lie and the first ruling just found that Georgia had no standing, and that the judge had transferred the case to Missouri.

Which is more or less what happened the last time Biden tried to forgive student loans. Eventually Missouri was found to have standing, and all his efforts were thrown out.
Aside from a nagging feeling that it was known this was going to happen, and this was all for political talking points, I wanted to info dump.
A few tidbits from that prior lawsuit:

  • MOHELA supported loan forgiveness, although I can’t recall why. (I think it was about simplifying administration in the face of a bunch of loans that had already paid for themselves in terms of the interest collected. At this point the cost to maintain the loan on their books and or chase accounts they can’t write off is more expensive than attempting to recover the loan.)
  • MOHELA refused to be a plaintiff, and it was the state of Missouri claiming standing.
  • The state of Missouri only had standing due to a voluntary agreement where MOHELA would pay a certain percentage of revenue back to the state of Missouri - something it had not done for nearly a decade. Missouri’s standing was merely technical, and more or less un-realized.
  • Yet it still was used to fuck over millions of people, because Misery loves company.

Someone indicated that a court of appeals would take this up - that just means it goes to the supreme court eventually, where they come up with some dumbfuck ruling.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I take it the first link is older, the second one is newer?

I'm not American and I wonder if this stuff will ever cease to be in the news, I find it annoying to no end at this point (and can only guess how annoying it is to Americans who are actually affected by this). Biden might cancel some, even a lot of debt now, but within ten years you'll just end up with a new generation of people in debt. So, is there anything being done about, or politicians even vaguely suggesting some more systematic fix for this shitshow?

[-] weeeeum@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Seeing as he is longer running, is there any point in doing anything? You only accomplish things in office if you want to be reelected.

[-] Entropywins@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Maybe you only do things if they have some benefit to you, but a lot of us do the right thing because it's the right thing regardless.

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
258 points (100.0% liked)

196

18013 readers
780 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS