566
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to c/childfree@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 180 points 10 months ago

Young folks have been priced out of housing & healthcare, you can be fired from your job on a whim, food is astronomically expensive, the political climate is tense, your basic human rights could be rescinded at any time, the future of the planet is being murdered by shitty capitalists with 0 regard for human life....

I mean, who wouldn't want to bring a child into this world right now?

Eat shit.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 74 points 10 months ago

I'm hunting for a new job for the second time in less than a year, and I'm honestly a skilled professional with over 10 years of experience, with a lot of proof that I do great work. The labor market is stupid right now, just down right stupid. Full of executives searching for short term profits rather than anyone wanting to actually run a company well. That's alone is a huge reason, on top of everything else. I don't even know if I'll have stable employment, and that means I don't know if I'll have stable health insurance - so genuinely what are any actual incentives to my generation to have kids? Literally are there any beyond just "you have a kid now"

[-] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 31 points 10 months ago

It's shit, right? I'm so sorry. I hope that stability comes to you very soon.

Reject tradition. You have no obligation to sacrifice your well-being because some old, out-of-touch fuckwads want something life-changing from you. Can't even afford groceries.

They can foster a child if they want one around so badly. Or go sit at a park. Or volunteer at the church nursery or something, ffs.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 25 points 10 months ago

bingo. The SO and I have talked about it, and we decided if we regret it a bit later and it's too late, adoption is always a valid choice. After all, we're not bringing new life in so we don't have to feel guilty about that, but instead we would be giving a home to someone else who needs one. However, there are still many, many negatives as to why we don't want to or simply can't right now.

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 101 points 10 months ago

Once again Gen-X is ignored. It's Gen-X hitting grandparenting age.

My two kids probably won't be parents, and I'm ok with that. I want them to be happy more than I want to enjoy grandkids. Whatever they choose, I'll be happy with.

I felt pressure from Boomer parents to have kids, and I didn't want to do the same to my kids. That's a hard nope.

[-] criticon@lemmy.ca 48 points 10 months ago

Seems like old = boomers and young = millennials for journalist and a lot of people

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago

People are having kids later in life, and the youngest millennials are only ~29.

Millennials are predominantly the children of Boomers, so that’s why these two generations are basing singled out.

Gen-X were called the a Baby Bust generation for a reason; there aren’t enough of them around in order to swap population metrics compared to what came directly before and after.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Yeah this is a good point. Young boomers are, what, 65?

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 6 points 10 months ago

About 59 I think.

[-] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

I mean you can still have grandkids. I've heard they're great deep fried with a light cornmeal batter and a creamy dill sauce.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Once again Gen-X is ignored.

I will maintain, as I always do, that getting lumped in with the wrong group and ignored is the most Gen-X thing going right now.

With that, I conclude: whatever ::eye roll::.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 90 points 10 months ago

Told my mom if she wants grandkids she better stop voting for conservatives. Didn't work, and a deal's a deal.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

I mean, she's a boomer, if she said she had I still wouldn't trust her.

Boomers: "Reality can be anything I want."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 79 points 10 months ago

Maybe next time leave the ladder behind instead of taking it with you.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The wealthier Boomers left behind millions of tiny little ladders specifically for their kids to climb.

The poorer Boomers died before hitting retirement age, or died in debt, or bankrupted themselves paying for end-of-life health care, or got scammed or otherwise denuded of their accumulated wealth.

Incidentally, its the wealthier Boomers who continue to set national policy from the board rooms and lobbying offices established by their own parents and grandparents. Meanwhile the poorer and more isolated Boomers are left to drown in their own poverty, ineffectually raging at the collapse of neighborhoods and the destitution of their pension funds and the deterioration of their suburban homes, unless their children and grandchildren are able to help them out at the end of their days.

Folks like to pretend this is one generation pitted against another. But its selection bias. The only members of the Boomer generation you hear from are the ones that came out on top. The rest have been killed in the wars or poisoned by industrial waste and lead pollution or foreclosed into homelessness to die on the streets or confined to digital communities like Facebook where they're drowned out by waves of misinformation accounts. Legions of dead Boomers never got to decide how the current generations live. They were burned up and thrown out, just like the current generation of bourgeois GenXers and Millennials and Zoomers plan to do with the rest of us.

[-] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 68 points 10 months ago

Maybe they shouldn't horde and partition their wealth from their children and do everything possible to ensure every penny is spent before death.

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago

You're not wrong, but this is more of a class issue than a generational issue, although in this case they certainly intersect. My boomer parents don't have any money; they got screwed over by the 1% just like the rest of us.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago

Make college and homes unobtainable.. You get what you get and you don't get upset.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Seraph@fedia.io 63 points 10 months ago

"Oh no it's the consequences of my own actions!"

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 56 points 10 months ago

I want the lions share of the profits of our economy! I want to pull the ladder up behind me! Why aren't these lazy millennials having kids for me!?

You're entitled millennials!

/Vomit

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

you fucking millennials and your avocado toast cost me grandbebbies!

[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago

Shouldn't 'ave fucked up the economy and environment, simple as

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

Yeah cuz they're hoarding the houses.

[-] HorreC@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

How dare someone elses wants effect me!!

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 33 points 10 months ago

Who writes this trash...

Imagine a society ran for benefit of gereatrics and nepo babies at the expense of young working people

Now open your eyes 🤡

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Make the world a place that will be liveable in 100 years and pay people enough to exist:

A) without children, and B) with children

and boom, problem solved. Statistically, anyway.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Guess you shouldn't have been entitled little shits and fucked up the world, then.

[-] coolkicks@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Elder millennial here. I had kids, my brother didn’t, and my kids, though young enough to change their minds, are adamant they won’t have kids.

I think the more interesting stat likely unfolding is the marked decrease of great grandparents in a generation.

To be clear this is not a “threat to society” or whatever, people can decide if they want kids or not. Just a shower thought.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago

Aww. Maybe if they didn’t spend their days treating their kids like their bank accounts and actually voted to help them afford things like housing and health care they’d have grandkids.

Instead they supported ghouls like trump and clinton instead of the guy who wanted to give everybody health care!

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Way to focus, Wall Street Journal. We can always count on you for in-depth journalism

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"You should have kids so you'll have someone who will take care of you when you're older."

Bruh, I'm not subjecting a person to this godforsaken world so I can guilt trip them into babysitting me when I'm old and senile.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 8 points 10 months ago

as someone who's parents' retirement plan was that - I absolutely agree. There's no way anyone should subject their kids to that level of guilt and stress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

even if I had kids my dad would be excluded from grandparenting due to the trump worship. don't need that kind of influence on the adult family members let alone kids.

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 months ago
[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Wouldn't this be prime age for boomers to be great grandparents? Unless they mean paying for their grandkids college...

[-] neblem@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Boomers are 1946-1964. Definitely the older in the generation are in the great grandparent years, especially if they and their kids had kids young, but the younger boomers, especially if they and their kids had their first kids later, will be grandparents.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't exactly call that prime time for them to be grandparents, then...

[-] desktop_user 5 points 10 months ago

if they had kids at 30 their kids could have kids at 30.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

"If" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

And that's still just for the youngest of that generation, not the whole of it... I don't know about you, but I'd hardly call a minority of a minority "prime".

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 10 months ago

Boomers should have thought of the shareholders.

That is, the kids they fucked over with their bullshit ideas and absolute misunderstanding of the world they created.

I'd love to be able to speak with my parents again, but (and I never thought I would ever say this, if you had asked me 10 years ago) I need to see some heads popping out of asses.

[-] unrelatedkeg@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 10 months ago

For some reason I'm not surprised about Facebook being explicitly boomer-centric

[-] Mab_813@fedi.at 6 points 10 months ago

@scrubbles

Some people seem to assume it's their right to become grandparents...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
566 points (100.0% liked)

childfree

2382 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS