383

Zayna Iman's memory of her 40 hours in police custody comes back in flashes. What she does remember has haunted her for nearly three years.

The 39-year-old believes she was drugged and raped in her cell before being left naked and distressed on the floor, cowering under a blanket and so disorientated she urinated on herself.

Her quest for answers over what happened at Pendleton police station is subject of an IOPC investigation that has so far raised only more questions.

This is despite Zayna being handed dozens of pages of documents and police CCTV containing hour upon hour of distressing film - but, crucially, two are still missing.

Greater Manchester Police had initially told her that all cell footage had been reviewed, and there was no evidence to support her rape allegations.

Then the force told her several hours had been 'corrupted' and were not recoverable.

The IOPC began investigating and soon discovered the film 'was never downloaded', that GMP gave her false information and denied she had been strip-searched. It is now examining why.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 160 points 1 month ago

corruption of evidence controlled by the party alleged to have done the crime should always be taken as an admission of guilt. Don't want to be assumed guilty? Get better data systems, especially if it seems to only happen at key moments.

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They know what it looks like. They always know everybody knows what actually happened. It's obvious they are just covering their rapist asses because nobody can technically prove it, which is the point. They can accept the social backlash, they can't accept jail time.

No matter the country, no matter the time period, no matter the circumstances, never forget the universal truth: Blue Lives Don't Matter. Fuck The Police.

[-] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The data systems are probably fine. Police departments use VMS, ACS and PSIM systems that have audit trails built in.

This is user error/ ignorance/ intentional ignorance.

Edit I guess I shouldn't comment on backwater 3rd world counties. I live in an urban center and they are all kitted out here.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The oversight body, that acts outside the rapist precinct, says it cannot produce the 2 hours of video in question, even after sending drives off to forensics teams and scouring backups. They also have not provided answers as to why these specific 2 x 1 hour video blocks out of 40hrs, where the victim has clearly been recently drugged and was most likely raped, were not downloaded with the rest of the videos. They have also not given the victim any information about who opted not to download these videos, or who claimed they were "corrupted" initially.

They may have records, as they can clearly see that the videos in question were specifically excluded from from disclosure by the cops, but they won't tell the victim who opted to let those very important hours be overwritten.

She has been trying to get justice for 43 months. The oversight commitee finally took the case on 13 months ago when she released her story to the press. They were aware of a complaint she filed in 2022, but took no action, claiming her latest complaint, I.E press coverage, "brought new issues to light."

She still doesn't have answers.

[-] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago

Yup I had a thought about this. If they have appliance based recorders, tampering is a much more simple thing. If they "sent the drives off" this is probably the case, it wouldn't make sense to disassemble a server RAID to perform forensics.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They initially said that the had 4 discs, and one "corrupted," which just so happened to lose the most important 2 hrs out of the 40. Any raid except 0 would survive a loss of one disc, and 0 would lose all data, not just 5% of it. This sounds more like a JBOD config than RAID, which would be very stupid setup for data retention.

The oversight committee found that the "corruption" excuse was a lie, and instead that the person who "complied" with the requirement to hand over video opted to not download the most important 2hrs that would prove definitely either way if she was drugged and raped.

After being stonewalled and lied to by the precient for 2.5 years, she went to the press and suddenly the oversight committee started to do its job. After all the time that has passed, the data has likely been overwritten normally for too long to recover it.

The cops got exactly what they wanted. Some of them drugged and raped her, then the others covered it up by intentionally failing to do their jobs, lying about it over and over again for years, and letting time take its course. The oversight committee helped out by ignoring her complaint until the government and press forced it to act, and now is slow rolling the investigation to make sure that nothing happens to the rapist cops and their enablers.

As always, even in the UK, ACAB.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

"Mistakes" happen far to often not to be intentional.

Nonono, be more specific. If the cops do it, then yes. If other grand/mass surveillance things do this, then yes.

But this could just as easily be taken as "You had your phone with you and didn't record during the time of the crime? Sucks to be you!"

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, this should be the law, not just a good idea. Cops should be presumed guilty until proven innocent in every case where their actions are supposed to be recorded.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 29 points 1 month ago

When the DailyMail reports it as bad, yikes.

For those posting DailyMail links, they are considered a FOX News styled news org in the UK.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
383 points (100.0% liked)

News

23281 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS