853
Whoa (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by EndOfLine@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Seraph@fedia.io 66 points 1 year ago

Science is indistinguishable from magic, if you don't care to learn how science works.

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago
[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

But... if there's a consistent system along which magic works which can be studied/researched/formulated, then isn't it just... science?

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago

The keyword is consistent. Some settings have magic as inherently chaotic and difficult to control.

A good rule of thumb is that if a fantasy setting has a school for magic, it's probably a science. If it's knowledge passed from master to magically gifted student, it's probably not very consistent.

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

That's not how magic works

[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

magic works

Humans have yet to prove it.

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Well, it sometimes does

[-] kamenlady@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Watch "Agatha all Along" - the series is managing to answer exactly this question with a great script and cast.

/s

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

I absolutely feel like in a thousand years, we'll talk to a machine and not even know how it works.

Hell, I look at the computer in front of me and only feel like I know a fraction of what's going on.

[-] CheesyGordita@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Hail the Omnissiah!

[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's what neural networks are now. We do not know how it works under the hood. We just feed it training data.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

We know how it works, but we can't explain exactly how it got to the answers.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

We do, though.

Just to make sure my understanding was accurate, I asked Gemini to critique my explanation:

.

Unless it’s lying to me about itself, I was able to explain the basics of it in two relatively simple sentences. Of course that doesn’t cover everything, but Gemini thinks that’s a pretty good overview. After expanding on each point in its reply, it said this:

I think a lot of the confusion over these models stems from hype and marketing that makes them out to be more than what they are.

[-] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

Magnets, how do they work?

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago

I just love how the conspiracies reinforce each-other in the most convenient ways.

"Anyone who doesn't get vaxed is going to be put in a FIMA concentration camp!"

"What? That's crazy, where's the evidence of that?!"

"You can't find it because they're censoring everything on the Internet."

So now, not finding evidence of conspiracy 1 is evidence for conspiracy 2!

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I don't believe a lot of conspiracy theories, but I do have some conspiracy hypotheses

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I have conspiracy speculations

[-] kusari 3 points 1 year ago

I have conspiracy guestimations

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sometimes when I'm alone I have conspiracy masturbations

[-] kusari 1 points 1 year ago

When you are at the Diddy party and you have a conspiracy ejaculation:

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Also: when conspiracy theories are convenient ways to avoid havig to understand how things work.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And this a very common mindset, because most societies (some more than others) take children’s* innate curiosity and pound it flat for the sake of efficiency by way of standardisation. It really is a shame, since we waste a lot of potential as a species this way.

e: a word

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

That's what they want you to believe!

[-] lath@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It's only a conspiracy theory if it's not a proven conspiracy.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Its only a conspiracy theory if its more than one guy.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Not a native speaker but "guy" is gender neutral for a while now, at least on the variety used online. At least from what I know

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago

Litmus test is the "Would you have sex with a group of guys?"

If you're picturing a orgy with hairy people holding shlongs, then it's not gender neutral.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

"Guy" is used differently in different contexts, just like "girl".

If someone says "the girls had a sleepover" you know they're probably talking about female children. If someone's talking about a girls' night out, you know they're almost certainly talking about women.

"Would you have sex with a group of guys?” is using guy as a stand-in for man. But, if someone said "Guys, can we all just quiet down for a second so Stan can speak?" it's a synonym for "folks" or "people" or something gender-neutral.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Litmus test is the “Would you have sex with a group of guys?”

Dipping the tip into a group of guys and checking the color.

You are correct but you can't get away from pedants online.

I know because I'm one of them.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Well then you're not my friend, guy.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago

He's not your guy buddy!

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Throwing a line from Hitman in the mix to make it more confusing:

“If it looks like a conspiracy, it probably isn’t.”

[-] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Why does it look like that then? Tananananana 🎵

[-] Panurge987@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm just glad to see "whoa" spelled correctly.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Conversely, everything is a conspiracy when you do understand how things work.

[-] yboutros@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

Underrated comment

Everyone's conspiring folks. What's hard to measure, is who's conspiring

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It’s important to understand the prevalence of coincidence and incompetence. Humans are exceptional at pattern-finding – too good, really. In order to think critically, we need to recognise our own tendency to find patterns where none exist.

[-] SuperApples@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Good use of Keanu meme, as he recently fell for and is promoting a conspiracy theory (ancient civilizations).

[-] bizarrocullen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Wrong use of meme

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
853 points (100.0% liked)

memes

20337 readers
1856 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS