853
Whoa (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by EndOfLine@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Seraph@fedia.io 66 points 10 months ago

Science is indistinguishable from magic, if you don't care to learn how science works.

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 22 points 10 months ago
[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

But... if there's a consistent system along which magic works which can be studied/researched/formulated, then isn't it just... science?

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 10 months ago

The keyword is consistent. Some settings have magic as inherently chaotic and difficult to control.

A good rule of thumb is that if a fantasy setting has a school for magic, it's probably a science. If it's knowledge passed from master to magically gifted student, it's probably not very consistent.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 10 months ago
[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

That's not how magic works

[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

magic works

Humans have yet to prove it.

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

Well, it sometimes does

[-] kamenlady@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Watch "Agatha all Along" - the series is managing to answer exactly this question with a great script and cast.

/s

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 months ago

I absolutely feel like in a thousand years, we'll talk to a machine and not even know how it works.

Hell, I look at the computer in front of me and only feel like I know a fraction of what's going on.

[-] CheesyGordita@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Hail the Omnissiah!

[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

That's what neural networks are now. We do not know how it works under the hood. We just feed it training data.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

We know how it works, but we can't explain exactly how it got to the answers.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

We do, though.

Just to make sure my understanding was accurate, I asked Gemini to critique my explanation:

.

Unless it’s lying to me about itself, I was able to explain the basics of it in two relatively simple sentences. Of course that doesn’t cover everything, but Gemini thinks that’s a pretty good overview. After expanding on each point in its reply, it said this:

I think a lot of the confusion over these models stems from hype and marketing that makes them out to be more than what they are.

[-] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 1 points 10 months ago

Magnets, how do they work?

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 36 points 10 months ago

I just love how the conspiracies reinforce each-other in the most convenient ways.

"Anyone who doesn't get vaxed is going to be put in a FIMA concentration camp!"

"What? That's crazy, where's the evidence of that?!"

"You can't find it because they're censoring everything on the Internet."

So now, not finding evidence of conspiracy 1 is evidence for conspiracy 2!

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

I don't believe a lot of conspiracy theories, but I do have some conspiracy hypotheses

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I have conspiracy speculations

[-] kusari 3 points 10 months ago

I have conspiracy guestimations

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Sometimes when I'm alone I have conspiracy masturbations

[-] kusari 1 points 10 months ago

When you are at the Diddy party and you have a conspiracy ejaculation:

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Also: when conspiracy theories are convenient ways to avoid havig to understand how things work.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And this a very common mindset, because most societies (some more than others) take children’s* innate curiosity and pound it flat for the sake of efficiency by way of standardisation. It really is a shame, since we waste a lot of potential as a species this way.

e: a word

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 11 points 10 months ago

That's what they want you to believe!

[-] lath@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

It's only a conspiracy theory if it's not a proven conspiracy.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Its only a conspiracy theory if its more than one guy.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago
[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago

Not a native speaker but "guy" is gender neutral for a while now, at least on the variety used online. At least from what I know

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 7 points 10 months ago

Litmus test is the "Would you have sex with a group of guys?"

If you're picturing a orgy with hairy people holding shlongs, then it's not gender neutral.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

"Guy" is used differently in different contexts, just like "girl".

If someone says "the girls had a sleepover" you know they're probably talking about female children. If someone's talking about a girls' night out, you know they're almost certainly talking about women.

"Would you have sex with a group of guys?” is using guy as a stand-in for man. But, if someone said "Guys, can we all just quiet down for a second so Stan can speak?" it's a synonym for "folks" or "people" or something gender-neutral.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Litmus test is the “Would you have sex with a group of guys?”

Dipping the tip into a group of guys and checking the color.

[-] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You are correct but you can't get away from pedants online.

I know because I'm one of them.

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago

Well then you're not my friend, guy.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 10 months ago

He's not your guy buddy!

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Throwing a line from Hitman in the mix to make it more confusing:

“If it looks like a conspiracy, it probably isn’t.”

[-] lustyargonian@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Why does it look like that then? Tananananana 🎵

[-] Panurge987@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I'm just glad to see "whoa" spelled correctly.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

Conversely, everything is a conspiracy when you do understand how things work.

[-] yboutros@infosec.pub 3 points 10 months ago

Underrated comment

Everyone's conspiring folks. What's hard to measure, is who's conspiring

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

It’s important to understand the prevalence of coincidence and incompetence. Humans are exceptional at pattern-finding – too good, really. In order to think critically, we need to recognise our own tendency to find patterns where none exist.

[-] SuperApples@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Good use of Keanu meme, as he recently fell for and is promoting a conspiracy theory (ancient civilizations).

[-] bizarrocullen@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Wrong use of meme

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
853 points (100.0% liked)

memes

16691 readers
3060 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS