654
At minimum 4% of USA citizens are complete monsters with hate in their hearts. It’s actually much higher, but for sure we say that 4% are awful people.
33% of a country are always Authoritarians. Those are the people who vote to end democratic rule and install dictatorships.
load more comments
(2 replies)
4% is around the lizardman constant.
load more comments
(1 replies)
4%
That's... That's pretty low.
Still too high
There's some info stickers the Harris campaign sells if you want to help lower that for the people around you. Or at least increase the number of unfavorable view of it
https://store.kamalaharris.com/look-up-project-2025/
(Can also make your own stickers like that too)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Those are probably just the people who would benefit from it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
57% is also way too low. That sjould be in the 80s
Agreed, but there are a lot of low-information voters out there who have probably never heard of it because they don't follow political news closely.
load more comments
(1 replies)
We should take that 4% and put them on a remote island. We don't need to bother shipping over food, I'm sure their God will provide it for them and they'll all get to live in a blissful paradise.
If Trump doesn't want to join the next debate it should be Kamala Harris arguing point to point against Project 2025 during the time slot. I would watch that.
She should also spend some time tying Project 2025 to dimbulb donnie, too. He keeps claiming he "doesn't know her" when it comes to Project 2025, but that's nonsense.
A great opening segment talking about how it was made by trump staffers.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Project 2025 has a 57% unfavorable rating, but the party that endorses it does not.
Curious.
Fans of the Leopards Eating Faces Party don't like it when it's their faces being threatened.
(They'll still vote for them, though.)
The other 39% view it unfavorably but don't have the spine to speak out against their own party when they know the poll results will be publicized.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Well yeah, they want to eliminate the fucking national weather service. Project 2025 is a plan to stop governing and begin ruling.
who are the effing 4%? I could see maybe 1% but less than one percent of that group would gain from it.
The 4% are the ones who think it will help them until it is their turn to be the ones shit on.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Same as the other 39% who apparently have no opinion.
load more comments
(7 replies)
And yet when piecemealed liberals and Republicans will completely embrace the aspects of project 2025. The same way they're doing KOSA which originated with the HF
Not as bad as schilling for the Russian plant Jill Stein— or acting like a traitor to promote a foreign power during an election.
You don’t know anyone like that, do you?
Liberals are so desperate to smear anything that's a threat to their privilege in society and a perceived threat to the breadcrumbs that get tossed to them.
goddamn the rock hard edge on this one, it’s sooo cooool.
load more comments
(6 replies)
This is so self-evidently preposterous I don't even know what I could add to further refute it.
What do you think people hate about it, the name? Come on. Hatred for the proposals in it is the most bipartisan thing I've seen in a decade at least.
No.
KOSA which came from the Heritage Foundation recently passed the Senate 93 - 3
Go familiarize yourself with the total aims of Project 2025 and then maybe you'll see why you look like a complete shill trying to equate these 2 things.
The Heritage Foundation roots of KOSA
Advising getting the bill passed is imperative
And that's how the two things are equal.
Care to guess who the shill is?
What part of KOSA dissolves the Department of Education?
What part of KOSA enacts government monitoring women's pregnancies?
Do you understand the concept of false equivalency?
Do you even understand what the word "equal" is?
Stop wasting everyone's time.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
No link to the poll, data, or polling methodology anywhere in the article. Does Newsweek still hire journalists?
more people realizing this would just make the us a dictatorship
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
654 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19097 readers
2859 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS