Despite new evidence of innocence.
Conservatives/Republicans are psychopaths. Pure abject sadistic evil.
Not just new evidence. There was never any physical evidence linking him to the crime at all, according to the articles I've seen so far looking into it.
Execution shouldn't be an option. At least with life in prison you can release a person if you fucked up, with significant financial compensation for their time in prison. You can't un-execute a person. The state isn't competent enough to be given such power. Nobody is.
The purpose of the US legal system is not to provide justice. It's to terrorise poor people and minorities. So, it worked just fine here.
But what is the cost of compensation for executing somebody that was likely innocent?
—Think about this. Life in prison is cheaper than an execution If the convict serves their entire sentence. –Is it still cheaper if the inmate has their conviction overturned and subsequently sues for restitution?
I genuinely don't know the answer to the latter question but nothing about sanctioned executions sits right with me.
South Carolina executed a man on death row on Friday, days after the key witness for the prosecution came forward to say he lied at trial and the state was putting to death an innocent man.
"New evidence" seems to be underselling the matter. How in the fuck could they justify not even granting a delay??
Black man in South Carolina is enough apparently
Clearly he should have been a black man in North Carolina and called himself a Nazi while chatting on porn site comments sections, as one does. I hear they make you the gubernatorial candidate in such situations.
System works as designed.
I don't understand how you can convict someone based on the testimony of a person getting a plea deal for turning in another person.
The last thing the person getting the plea deal would want to do is turn over someone loyal enough to them to rob a place and shoot another person with.
Does anyone think this would have happened if the accused was the son of a wealthy white couple? How about if it was the police chief's son? Any senator's son?
Just saying. Testimony without hard evidence shouldn't be enough for criminal conviction, let alone a fucking execution.
I don’t understand how you can convict someone based on the testimony of a person getting a plea deal for turning in another person.
Please refer to North Carolina's skin color chart for further explanation.
Another potential innocent murdered by the state so they can claim they're "tough on crime"
Pre meditated murder the way I see it.
Rest in peace.
'not like he has much of a choice.
Wow I thought this was the one that was posted about last month... it's not. I just looked it up and this means a 2nd person is set to die next week who is definitely innocent after seeing the video on him. So many people are trying to help him because it's that bad...
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/18/us/marcellus-williams-missouri-execution-delay-request/index.html
The Rev Hillary Taylor, executive director of South Carolinians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, said the flaws in Allah’s case were a reminder that “the death penalty is not given to the ‘worst of the worst’, it is given to the people who are least able to represent themselves in court”
Salient words.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.