0

So there was a bit of a heated discussion recently on the topic of "anti-white" or "reverse" racism and we (some of the mods) figured we would clarify some rules for this community:

  • "White people" is a very vague term. Having low expectations of people in the imperial core is understandable for someone in the Global South, but it's better to be specific. Saying "I'm racist against white people" when you mean "I don't trust the average person in " is going to cause misunderstandings
  • People who were racist in the past are not necessarily racist in the present. Many of us were liberals before becoming Marxists, and there's a significant overlap between liberals and racists
  • No matter your ethnicity, don't use terms like "subhuman" or "orc" to describe yourself and your group; it may make others uncomfortable
  • Don't call for violence (particularly against ethnic groups, but it's best to avoid it in general so the instance doesn't get in trouble)
  • Stick to Lemmygrad's rules of good-faith discussion

that's all, folks

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I'm very relieved reading that. In some places in the past this topic was often really hot and incredibly USA-centric.

[-] Sinokai@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

geniune question: are we able to call for traitors and enemies of the working class to get the wall or no?

[-] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

it's probably fine if it's something vague like " gets the wall", but direct death threats to individuals might get the instance in trouble with the server provider (you'd have to ask an admin for a concrete answer)

[-] destructor_rph@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Can we still say 'Amerikkkrakker'?

It's basically just "gringo" but longer

[-] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Well, gringo doesn’t have to be American or white at all. It’s usage (at least among the Spanish-speakers I know) seems to be much more akin to the term foreigner. I would definitely see gringo as having a different meaning than “white” or a word referring to people in the USA like Yankee or Statesian.

[-] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I thought gringo meant someone who doesn't speak Spanish. Particularly if they can only speak English and are/act like a white person.

I've heard it used to broadly refer to people from western countries and also nth-gen Latin Americans who don't speak any Spanish. But that's it (from my experience).

I never heard gringo being used in meaning other than "white Usian" (or occasionally their also Usian PoC lackeys), but i'm not from there, so...

[-] Neptium@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I can understand the practical realities of moderation in an anonymous online space in which such sentiments can quickly escalate to a personal level.

But we really need to kill racial ideology. I don’t think we should be that uppity about it.

We SHOULD be racist against “White people”!

Because it doesn’t exist in real life!

Why are we treating a colonial stratification of peoples into “races” and “ethnicities” at face value? Why are we offended like there is a global White genocide?

People in the global south don’t need white guilt. They don’t need self-flagellating whites on one hand and white supremacists on the other. They need “white people” to help tear down this globe-spanning economic and ideological system of stratification that has caused so much pain and suffering.

The hatred of white people is a hatred of this racist system of Capitalism that forcefully and continuously suffocates the entire world.

Mental colonization runs deep in postcolonial societies - and when the colonized lashes out, it is an expression of the humanity that has been denied. The least of my problems is when the oppressed uses the oppressor’s language to demonstrate the false justifications of the oppressor’s existence.

To phrase this another way to make it really on the nose: there are 1.5 billion Global Northerners, while there are 6.5 billion Global Southerners, and since might makes right, “white people” should really be the ones oppressed (lol).

[-] juchebot88@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

So the "white" thing is interesting. White supremacists like to talk about "white culture" and "white identity," but in practice being "white" means having no culture and having no identity; whatever culture you originally possessed has been assimilated to the general American anti-culture of mass consumerism and social climbing. You have become the atomized individual, without family or communal ties, which is required by the capitalist machine. This evident in the way European immigrant to the US have historically not been considered "white" until their original culture is entirely lost; even the Germans, who are about European as European can be, were for a long time somewhat stigmatized as "Dutchmen."

In other words: people who are proud to be "white" are fighting for a cipher, something which, as you said doesn't really exist. Maybe in remote parts of Appalachia, say, there is something approaching a "white culture;" but even that is more a regional Southern thing than it is a "white" thing. White persons in (say) Washington or Seattle have little in common with it, and it seems to them quite foreign and "exotic."

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

GenZedong

16 readers
1 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

If you haven't already found it, this GitHub page is an excellent collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics, made by @dessalines and others.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a private Matrix room. See this thread for more information.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS