653
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hairyblue@kbin.social 168 points 1 year ago

The news article name is:

‘Fascist’ and ‘tyrant’ DeSantis under fire after removing another black elected Democratic state attorney

[-] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

You don't need the quotation marks.

[-] hihellobyeoh@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I agree with what you mean, but they do need them as the easiest defense against a slander suit.

[-] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I'd argue in court that he's a fascist tyrant. The precedent will be useful.

[-] genoxidedev1@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

"Your honor... look at him"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FReddit@lemmy.world 152 points 1 year ago

A black, democrat, elected official.

No agenda here.

[-] millifoo@lemmy.ca 106 points 1 year ago

How the frick is this legal?

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 109 points 1 year ago

When fascists take power, everything they do is legal.

[-] teft@startrek.website 75 points 1 year ago

From a CNN article:

The Florida constitution allows a governor to remove an elected official for “malfeasance, misfeasance, neglect of duty, habitual drunkenness, incompetence, or permanent inability to perform official duties.” No previous Florida executive has interpreted that power as broadly as DeSantis. The state Senate can reinstate Worrell, but the chamber is controlled by Republicans closely aligned with DeSantis and have rarely stood in his way.

Warren’s attempts at reinstatement have failed. A federal judge ruled DeSantis had acted unconstitutionally in suspending Warren, writing that there was “not a hint of misconduct by Mr. Warren” in the trial record, but he ultimately dismissed the case saying he did not have the power to intervene on a state matter. The state Supreme Court tossed Warren’s lawsuit in state court earlier this summer.

Monique Worrell was the attorney recently dismissed and Andrew Warren is the one who was dismissed last year.

[-] kiku123@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago

Things like this always make me wonder if a state could legally turn into a dictatorship.

Could Florida legally change it's constitution to say "All governing power rests entirely in Ron DeSantis" and dissolve it's representative bodies? Obviously it would still be beholden to voters for national elections (representatives and senators), but statewide there could be nothing.

[-] HighElfMage@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Technically, no. The Constitution says "the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government," but "republican" has historically been very loosely interpreted. Technically, China and North Korea are both republics.

[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're not technically republics, they're nominally republics.

[-] HighElfMage@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Well part of the problem is that there isn't total agreement on what a republic is. By some definitions it's basically anything that isn't a monarchy. Some medieval republics didn't have elections and instead chose their officials by sortition, which is essentially a lottery. China and North Korea do have elections, but they're total shams (and North Korea is basically a monarchy is a thin coat of republican paint, since by law they can't have any leader that isn't descended from Kim Il Sung).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ANALHACKER_3000@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Possibly. The problem is that the founders decided to bake in armed revolt as a safe guard instead if, you know, reasonable solutions.

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

The state Supreme Court tossed Warren’s lawsuit in state court earlier this summer.

Why the fuck? You know, besides the fascism...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

More importantly, who is going to stop them?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 73 points 1 year ago

Florida: Where Fascism Goes to Flourish.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Ron DeSantis probably has a massive amount of hours logged for the game Tropico.

[-] Countmacula@lemm.ee 66 points 1 year ago

Watch a dem do the same and have every maga POS tripping over themselves to call them out.

Dems have to start fighting fire with fire.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

That's a problem when you have one group trying to do what is remotely morally right and another who doesn't care and wants to "win" at any cost.

[-] aDuckk@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's also a problem when a group has most of the guns and is stupid enough to use them without thought for the consequences. Moreso when the authorities responsible for enforcing those consequences tend to be in agreement if not allegiance with the group in question.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wouldn't be so sure that they have us out armed. The majority of veterans are left leaning, and most of us kept our service sidearms and rifles.

[-] dirtytreewhiskey@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Huh? What bullshit is that? As an actual leftist veteran I know that most veterans are not left leaning. I also know that the US military does not let you keep any sidearms or rifles with you even while you are in. That stuff gets locked up in the arms room. CIF doesn't even let you keep your canteens when you ETS, let alone weapons.

[-] drewofdoom@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Anecdotal, but I had a roommate who was a veteran. He most definitely still had his rifle. He was also very left leaning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
[-] CaptainMeatshield@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

They've gone through all the effort of putting their teeth closer to your boots, it'd be inconsiderate to not let them meet.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They need to, but they won't.

Relevant Innuendo Studios: https://youtu.be/MAbab8aP4_A

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blazera@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago

I feel like im never goin to disney world at this rate

[-] kitonthenet@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not, not if it’s like this, I’ll just go to the one in California instead

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

i really want to go to kennedy sc but not with all this crap happening in florida.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

I wanted to live in florida. I love the weather. It's been my dream to move there and now that the kids are grown up and I have the means to move there, I don't want anything to do with that state in its current form. It really sucks.

[-] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Belize has basically the same weather and doesn't suck horribly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] scytale@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

I've never been and will probably never go. We'll just settle with the other one in CA.

[-] Behaviorbabe@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Same for me. I grew up in Florida and lived there for decades. I haven’t been back since 2018 and I don’t know if I ever will, which is a kind of sad feeling tbh.

[-] BloodyFable@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I have to go to a wedding at WDW next year and I hate that I do.

[-] nostalgicgamerz@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s about time we start thinking about the plan where he is removed by a “candidate” who has nothing to live for

At this rate, he can handpick the Secretary of State who can rig the governor vote in his favor and he will never lose any election

[-] DrPop@lemmy.one 30 points 1 year ago

Like in Georgia where the secretary of state didn't recuse themselves from the responsibility of managing the election then ran for governor. Cities get hours long waits and rural areas have no problems. Also sending voting machine to black districts without power cords.

[-] nostalgicgamerz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

That is exactly what the fuck I was referring to Brian goddamn Kemp

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

This is what the Republicans want, to concentrate power in the hands of the executive so they had ignore the people

[-] Rac3r4Life@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

This is what fascism looks like folks.

[-] GFGJewbacca@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago

This shouldn't happen in America. And the guy who did it shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the White House," said David Rothkopf, a noted foreign policy, national security and political affairs expert and commentator.

I agree that this shouldn't be happening, but it is. It's a clear indication of the GOP wanting to operate as a fascist party, and this needs to be taken seriously. I hope that happens.

[-] Yepthatsme@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Florida is the capital of the New Confederacy that liters nobody wants. If you just stop giving money to the crooked catholic shitcunt church and the evangelical shitcunt church then we probably wouldn’t have this problem.

The state has 56 white supremacy groups. What do you think goes on down there?

[-] argo_yamato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Was there even anything for him to backup removing her other than "for neglecting her duty to faithfully prosecute crime in her jurisdiction"? Sounds pretty fascist to me but that is the Republican dream isn't it?

[-] PaulDevonUK@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Now imagine all of America if he actually got elected POTUS in 2024.

Fortunately he is failing hard.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
653 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3465 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS