86
submitted 1 year ago by Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I'm keeping it broad by not specifying a distro. I'm just curious is this a real option for actual editing professionals? As far as I understand you can make it work by running under Wine, but I'm guessing this comes with significant drawbacks. I'm having trouble finding any information on both the current state of things with running Premiere under linux (most info seems to be from 2018 for some reason), and the extent of the drawbacks in a quantifiable way.

I'm generally a pretty happy Mac OS user, but I always want to keep options open. I haven't really tried to use Linux on desktop since the late 00s.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Vittelius@feddit.de 51 points 1 year ago

The reason, you aren't finding anything, is that nobody really attempts to install premiere or after effects anymore on Linux. The alternatives have cought up and they are available for Linux.

  • DaVinci Resolve provides the complete package. Video editor and (node based) compositor in one. Even outside of the Linux world there is a lot of momentum behind this tool, as I probably don't have to tell you. Keep in mind, that the free version on Linux has some limitations, that the free versions on the other OS's don't have (missing h264 support for example)
  • Left angle Autograph (https://www.left-angle.com/#page=95) is a young product, having seen its first release earlier this year. It's a direct competitor to After Effects. A timeline based VFX tool. Unfortunately fairly expensive as well.

Back to your question: making things work with wine has a significant drawback. Your system can break with every update. So you're not making it work just once but over and over again.

[-] fossisfun@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Someone should tell Left Angle that Ubuntu 22 is not a valid Ubuntu release.

It always infuriates me a bit whenever I see that and it immediately tells me that Linux doesn't seem to be a priority for them. For some reason they get the macOS version numbers right ...

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Is there any good alternative to Photoshop on Linux? That's about the only thing I miss after switching

There's GIMP but it seems a little clunky sometimes, I've heard krita is good for artists but I tend to just use this kind of thing for editing images

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

A lot of people claim good luck with PhotoPea

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It's a browser app though

Extremely laggy as PWA in chromium, less laggy in chrome and has to be used in a normal browser window in firefox

Doesn't work if I'm not connected to the internet and also ads taking up ~10-15% of the window

When it's working in firefox it seems like a decent alternative and even supports opening psds which is incredibly useful but not sure I'd want to run it in a browser, if it was open source could shove it in an electron wrapper and be done with it but doesn't seem to be, their public GitHub only has branding and information

load more comments (1 replies)

GIMP is currently missing non-destructive editing (a rather core feature), but that's something they're aiming to fix in 3.2. I don't know when that'll be here, but that will be a good day for GIMP.

You might have better luck with Affinity Photo—it doesn't really work well through Wine yet, but it's getting there: https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/182758-affinity-suite-v204-on-linux-wine/

I personally use Affinity Photo on macOS and I'm really happy with it. I like it more than Photoshop, actually. Fair warning that it will rasterize all your text layers in .PSD files, so you'd want to be using only .afphoto files, but it's impressive how good the .PSD support is otherwise. So, give it a year or two, and Affinity Photo might be in good shape in Wine! I mean, I can hope.

[-] s_s@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

GIMP is, last I checked, RGB colorspace only, so it's not a real choice for anyone doing print work.

[-] UnhappyCamper@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly, no there isn't. Even if Gimp can apparently do a lot of what Photoshop can, you have to first learn, then jump through 20 unintuitive hoops to get to the same result thst Photoshop can do in 2 clicks. Nothing compares as far as I'm concerned.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure there is really anything else like that on Linux though on a more positive note.

Most other tools I've ever had to interact with either have native support, run perfectly/very well with wine or have a good/better alternative on linux

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RoboRay@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can it be done? Yes.

Can it be done in a reliable way that you can depend on to always just work when you need it? No.

If you are completely dependent on Adobe products for your livelihood, you should not plan to work exclusively on Linux.

[-] UnhappyCamper@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

This was my experience with Photoshop. Got it installed, tried a few things, great, seems to work. Then eventually I went to actually use it, and it would consistently crash trying to do certain tasks. Back to dual boot I go..

[-] art@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Better off using native Linux applications. We have DaVinci Resolve, Lightworks, Blender, and Kdenlive. All are fantastic video editors that can give you very professional results.

Personally I use Kdenlive:

  • Doesn't require GPU
  • Automatic subtitles
  • Support for LUTs
  • Nested timelines
  • Proxy/Offline editing
  • Warp stabilizer
  • Free and Open Source

It's probably the most feature complete FOSS editor.

[-] astrsk@artemis.camp 8 points 1 year ago

To add to this, I also use Natron to replace After Effects. I use both of these on Linux and Windows too, serves me well as a light-mid user.

[-] mfat@lemdro.id 11 points 1 year ago
[-] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Interesting! I have some questions:

  • Is editing a primary part of your job?
  • How and why was ShotCut selected for your work?
  • How do you feel about ShotCut compared to other editing software on Linux, Windows, and MacOS?

Thanks!

[-] mfat@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

-Yes editing is a key part of my job. Although it's plenty of simple editing and almost no fancy effects and so on. I need to cut video edits fast, modify audio, crop and scale video.

-Shotcut loads instantly and runs natively on linux. That's the biggest selling point for me. It's extremely simple and has a clean UI. Also it handles .ts mpeg containers easily. Some apps, even premiere have issues with that format.

-I tried Openshot, Kdenlive and a couple of other apps. ShotCut was lighter and simpler.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] _s10e@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Forget wine. Virtual Machines or Remote Desktop work very well for generic Windows software. For graphics-heavy stuff, you need to learn whether this works for you.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

VM is your best bet for adobe stuff. You'd need GPU passthrough for proper hardware acceleration annoyingly.

Maybe dualbooting from Windows for those might be better until Proton and WINE can get resources to support Adobe stuff again!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gamey@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They crash enough on Windows already, I would highly recommend against it! :/

[-] Vitaly@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago
[-] nous@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=128

It is not rated well on winedb, although those look like old versions?. I would not have much hope in it working for professional needs . You would be better served by learning one of the more open or Linux friendly alternatives instead. Quite a few are quite good now for different needs. You would need to try them out your self to see if they meet your needs though. Which you can typically do on windows to minimise the disruption to your work flows. But be warned it can take some time to relearn them.

[-] Spudwart@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I use Kdenlive.

There will be massive performance issues due to driver support and in the way modern Adobe apps use the GPU to handle a lot of the work. Over the past few years as GPU's have become insanely powerful, Adobe have retooled a lot of their apps to make use of that number-crunching - before you could bruteforce it with a decent CPU but now a lot of program functions are handled by the graphics card - even things like canvas scaling and rotation are only active using the GPU.

Until Adobe make native versions (and there is corresponding driver support - nVidia run drivers built specifically for creative apps like those from Adobe and Autodesk), I wouldn't even consider using Linux for any type of creative work, to be honest.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t even consider using Linux for any type of creative work, to be honest.

I create schematics and PCBs on it all the time. But that's more engineering, not media and art.

[-] crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Not only that. If all you need to deal with are still images Inkscape, Krita and to some extent GIMP are quite enough for my students, and I teach at an art university.

[-] NathanUp@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I've been designing professionally since 2009, and have switched my workflow to 100% FLOSS tools. Scribus, Inkscape, and Krita are suitable for professional work these days.

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's not viable, doesn't run well or at all through wine and in VMs it's slow at best...

[-] President_Pyrus@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago

I am heavily considering switching to Linux aswell (though from Windows). I guess I would just spin up a VM if I need to run something I can't get to work on bare matal Linux.

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago

Dual boot for a while. Even if you're using a usb

[-] grue@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Dual boot is too inconvenient. Just go Linux cold-turkey and run Windows in a VM if you have to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ObiWahn@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I thought about dualboot using two SSDs, one for linux, one for Windows and a VM on linux using the physical Windows SSD. Don't know if it is really possible though...

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago

I remember trying to do that once, it wasn't possible IIRC but it might be now 10 years later

[-] President_Pyrus@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago

That's the plan. Windows will be on one ssd and Linux (probably Mint) on another.

[-] Gamey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Dualbooting is a great start for most people who want to switch but USB sticks have cheap storage controllers so they will die insanly fast if you put that kind of load on them permanentely and it will probably be slower than a HDD.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48073 readers
655 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS