24
Which distro? (lemmy.world)

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19744473

I'm going to be building a new computer soon for myself. (Going AMD for the first time, since intel microcode issue.)

I would say I'm an expert or advanced user, as been using pcs for 25 years and set up arch and slackware in the past. I have tried many distros and would like some feedback.

I mainly use my pc for gaming. I want something customizable, KDE ish, and without bloatware. A good wiki is a plus.

I think that i may end up with arch... is it better for gaming since it's bleeding edge and isn't steamos built off it?

Side question is distro chooser accurate?

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 12 points 5 days ago

how has no one rec'd bazzite, yet? It's literally 'THE' KDE/Gaming linux distro lol

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Interesting, built off fedora, I'll check it out.

[-] Breadhax0r@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

I tried bazzite and nobara which are both the big gaming distros. Bazzite worked the best but I had a ton of just weird little issues with stuff randomly not working unless I restarted it. I don't have much to say about nobara because I couldn't actually get steam to work for some reason.

I went back to mint and honestly it's been the smoothest and easiest to use distro, plus it has a larger user base so it's easier to find help.

[-] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago

Nobara is very good for middle user that just want a ready-to-game distro; Bazzite is best for noobs, thanks to immutability; for an experienced user there are no reasons to not use Arch.

[-] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Arch. Bazzite/Nobara are for noobs (in a positive way, don't get me wrong). Gaming is in spot where you want stability but also a rolling release, since we have daily improvements on essential packages; as an experienced user you can use Arch for that; consider also even Valve is on it with the Steam Deck (Arch-based).

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Thanks, I was leaning towards arch. I like it's wiki.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Rolling distro, up to date kernel, very good KDE support, stable?

OpenSuse Tumbleweed has got you covered.

Though this weird bloat fetish usually leads to Arch...

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

On the other side: point-release distro, LTS kernel, also very good KDE support, practically unbreakable?

Debian to the rescue.

This one won't lead to Arch.

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Isn't debian a bit behind on graphic drivers?

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They are, but for AMD, it won't matter much as the driver has matured by kernel 6.1

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

you must have missed the part where OP said he was going AMD this round lool

[-] degen@midwest.social 3 points 5 days ago

Fair enough, but that is OP, my friend

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

it would seem I missed that point entirely bahaha
fitting username to you sir

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

What's amd have to do with graphics drivers on debian? I'm out of the loop.

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

I'm just fanboying for amd and an idiot. please disregard my trolling

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Does amd have better or faster support for drivers then nvidia?

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

ime yes, but only because well...there is no such thing as nvidia driver support

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

😆 good point.

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Understood, not really a fetish, more of I don't want extra stuff that I don't want to use or take space for no reason.

I want to use every drop of my system for performance, maybe that's from my "old person" in me.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Non-running software doesn't affect performance as it isn't anywhere near your RAM or CPU. What often people perceive of bloat is frequently software dependencies that are likely to be used over the course of the OS's usage.

Often I have found bloat free setups end up taking hours of digging out dependencies on multiple occasions. Life is too short. I have things to build.

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It still takes space on the drive. It takes an icon on the start menu.

And then there's that little devil in me that I don't want to send feedback back to servers of what I do with my system.

Maybe I'm paranoid or maybe I just want to squeeze all the pure power (and space) I can. It's like an old hot rod, there's no radio; there's no heated seats; it's made to go fast and have fun.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

It does take space on the hard drive. Can easily remove desktop shortcuts. Telemetry on open source software doesn't usually happen without consent and you can turn it off (Firefox for example).

This is more of a feeling type thing. If it makes you feel good though, go ahead.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

Gentoo lets you trim the fat even more by adjusting your packages at build-time. It has great KDE support. It comes with LTS kernel, but lets you opt for newer ones.

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

is also quickest penguin and best meta-distro (only one of it's kind really)

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Right, built for my system.

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Hmmm... thanks for the response, I like how it's more built for your system since you compile it locally.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

The USE flags (feature compilation option) can be a bit tricky to manage, but they've tidied up the defaults quite a bit.

The one thing that might still be hard to get right is having all the media codec you need. I wish they'd include it in the default so I didn't have to fine tune it myself, but well, that's just part of the fun, and I already got my battle-tested set, so I got nothing to complain.

[-] BingBong@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I use PopOS on my rig which is primarily gaming. It does great and gets out of my way.

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Thanks for your response.

[-] missingno@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago

Anything popular enough that you can easily google any issues you need to troubleshoot. Beyond that it truly doesn't matter.

[-] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

My first and current distro is Pop_OS and it’s been a bit of a pain in the ass. I need to run terminal commands to get Bluetooth to work, Rocksmith is a lost cause, my display signal dies randomly, forcing a restart.

Thinking about Bazzite, but read this article and maybe Ubuntu is just easier, for now?

(Nvidia gpu giving me pause over which will support it better)

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Well, one could make the argument about driver support.

[-] 737 1 points 4 days ago

Arch, void, fedora, parabola are pretty good

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
24 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

15485 readers
70 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS