543
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Former president repeats false claims that immigrants in Ohio were eating pets

Donald Trump’s false claim that immigrants in Ohio are abducting pets and eating them during Tuesday’s presidential debate was quickly slapped down by ABC News moderator David Muir.

While on the debate stage in Philadelphia, the former president asserted that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio were “eating dogs” and “eating the cats” while pushing his anti-immigration policies.

“What they have done to our country by allowing these millions and millions of people to come into our country and look at what’s happening to the towns all over the United States,” the former president said.

“In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs. The people that came in. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating – they’re eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what’s happening in our country, and it’s a shame,” the former president claimed.

As he spoke, Harris looked in disbelief at the former president before laughing.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 154 points 2 months ago

Lol. This old bitch is getting owned by his own insane base. Fucking hilarious.

Love that Kamala laughed at this in her response.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago
[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 2 months ago

They literally believe that. Like, I've kind of fallen into a hole watching this one right wing cartoonist just to see how crazy the crazy gets, and he leans hard on Harris having a somewhat annoying sounding laugh that he turns up to 11.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Women can’t laugh. Hillary got the same shit. And black women especially can’t be mad. It’s BS for sure.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Trump is too psychotic to laugh at all, or genuinely smile, for that matter. The closest he gets is that goofy smug smirk.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 106 points 2 months ago

At first I was annoyed that the moderators kept letting him speak out of turn.

Then, when he was just putting foot in mouth again and again, I couldn't wait for him to talk again.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

Never prevent your enemies from making a mistake.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

Reminded me of Obama's classic "please proceed, governor" in the Romney debate.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 100 points 2 months ago

Homeboy has lost the plot, it’s well past time for bed, grandpa

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 63 points 2 months ago

Don't you think [he] looks tired...?

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago

He looks unwell

[-] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

If only it was that easy...

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

Six words! Six six six!

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 80 points 2 months ago

Her disbelief at him as he said that is my favorite part of the debate, hands down.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I called it a while ago.

Nothing gets under Trump's skin more than being laughed at by a woman.

He wants to be this big scary bully, and laughing at someone like that is the worse you can do to them. I haven't watched the whole thing yet. But from Daily Show Kamala just alternated between that and looks of disbelief

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago

I noticed after the initial laugh Harris had to temper her smile a bit to evoke serious disappointment in Trump's unhingedness and not look like she is agreeing. I bet Harris was absolutely ecstatic in that moment seeing how effectively he took the bait she laid for him.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 64 points 2 months ago

I heard the illegals are Hannibal Lecter now. And some are sharks with batteries.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Just as long as the sharks don’t get frick’n lasers on their heads.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Right now they're just ill-tempered

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago

Hey, this is serious! Those robo-sharks voted for Biden!

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 61 points 2 months ago

As Sun Tzu put it, never interrupt your enemy while he’s making a mistake.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

I so hope you’re right, but so far whatever twisted version of reality we’re in has them eating out of his hand

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 6 points 2 months ago

“Given sufficient force, pigs can fly just fine”

We’ll soon see what it looks like when billions of dollars of force are applied to propelling a thoroughly unaerodynamic pig into the air.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I believe that's how Starbucks invented their Pink Drink

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Ehhh, people don't take kindly to assertions regarding animals/pets. It's not the same, but look how quickly everyone, including Republicans, turned on Kristi Noem after she doubled down on shooting her own dog.

Yeah, he'll rile up some of his base in Ohio and they'll start taking precautions to protect their animals, but the majority of pet owners aren't going to buy this, and they'll hopefully condemn him for not only the outright lies, but the xenophobia/racism embroiled with it.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

He must be REALLY worried about the childless cat lady vote.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 27 points 2 months ago
[-] FarFarAway@startrek.website 31 points 2 months ago

Racist people have been repeating this story long before trump ever took office. My father, decades ago, was always telling me this is why the family dogs would dissapear. Apparently, once a year, some gang (of non haitians) would come to our rural area, and steal the neighborhood pets.

Of course, our dogs would get hit by cars or shot, but it would happen to coincide with less barking of neighboring dogs (nah, it wasnt cause our wandering dog wasnt bothering them anymore /s) or another neighbor complaining their dog was missing, too.

I always thought it was the most ridiculous thing I ever heard, much less how the logistics worked out, but the story has been around for a very long time, even if some of the details have changed. These jerks have just co-opted another racist troupe to try to pander to their base.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

ZOMG BLACK PPL ARE GOING TO EAT UR CAT!!!1!1!

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago

It’s not just a false claim. It’s an old racist trope against Haitians. It was a slur used on national TV.

[-] nl4real@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

You could tell from Trump's body language the moment Harris insulted his crowd sizes he was gonna lose it. Best laugh I've had in a while about this campaign.

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Well, people on TV said it!

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
543 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2457 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS