"Can LLMs think like us?"
No.
"Can LLMs think—?”
No.
"Can LLMs—?"
"Can LLMs think like us?"
No.
"Can LLMs think—?”
"Can LLMs—?"
No
Not like us, but maybe like OP 🤣
Facts, reasoning, ethics, ect. are outside the scope of an LLM. Expecting otherwise is like expecting a stand mixer to bake a cake. It is helpful for a decent part of the process, but typically is lacking in the using heat to process batter into a tasty desert area. An AI like one from the movies would require many more pieces than an LLM can provide and saying otherwise is a a category mistake*.
That isn't to say that something won't be developed eventually, but it would be FAR beyond an LLM if it is even possible.
(* See also: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/category-mistakes/)
just science related topics. please contribute
note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry
Rule 1) Be kind.
lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about
I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll