164
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] freamon@endlesstalk.org 92 points 1 year ago

TempleOS. All other operating systems are sinful.

[-] Kissaki@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

Do you pray before logging in?

[-] freamon@endlesstalk.org 29 points 1 year ago

It wouldn't let you log in at all if you didn't. It's devine 2FA.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] redballooon@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago

Mac OS. People say it costs more, but I am not paying for a hardware and then some software that tries to make use of it. Instead I’m paying for a well thought out product that just works.

[-] DJDarren@beehaw.org 24 points 1 year ago

that (mostly) just works.

FTFY

As a Mac user since 2007 it feels like that statement gets a little less true every couple of years. But for me it’s still light years ahead of Windows when it comes to my workflow.

[-] darcy@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX. Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!

[-] u202307011927@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago

This is so annoying

[-] OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't stop there. I like to give the FULL name of my operating system when I use it. Example:

"What distro are you running?"

"Oh on this laptop here? This laptop is running Mint, daughter of Ubuntu, son of Debian, daughter of Linux, son of GNU! Her ancestors hail from the mountains of Copyleft, where the mighty Stallman wields his hammer Emacs to forge her people's legendary tools!"

Anything shorter is just disrespectful.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago

Found the Stallman!

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Evkob@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago

I use EndeavourOS. I like pacman and AUR, as well as the fact that Arch-based distros are well-supported by most software. I'm too much of a noob/too lazy to setup an OS without a GUI installer though, which is why I prefer Endeavour over Arch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bentropy@feddit.de 29 points 1 year ago

Windows because I know how to use it.

[-] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Windows 7.

It was the peak of windows.

It was slick. It was fast. It was stable, and it was super easy to use. Never had a single problem with it, and unlike past windows OS's it didnt require regular reformats to clean house for stability.

Unfortunately its dead now, and Microsoft abandoned that approach and switched to a slow burn approach at walled gardening.

I use Linux now, have been for years, because I saw where microsoft was going when Win10 was in previews, and there was no way I was going to be part of it.. So I jumped ship as soon as EoL was announced for Win 7

[-] glue_snorter@lemmy.sdfeu.org 7 points 1 year ago

Launch by hitting windows key and start typing (this is now a bullshit web search)

The taskbar was usable (fuck this app grouping)

Virtual desktops

Fast

Stable

Looked fine

Hit F8 for recovery options on boot

System rollback

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Mac OS

It’s pretty, functional, and has unix underneath so I can use it the way I really like to.

[-] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Linux because Linux

[-] FishSoupy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

MacOS, so easy to use that even 5 year old me had no trouble using it. Also because of how reliable it is, my custom PC running Windows has crashed more times in the past year than all the Mac’s I’ve ever had combined (since 2007)

[-] ProtonBadger@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Windows is rock solid and doesn’t crash unless there are problems with a 3rd party driver or hardware like RAM. That’s why custom rigs can sometimes have problems because it’s not all controlled by one company.

I prefer Linux though. I find Windows annoying.

[-] Loki@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure if this is a joke or not, but in case it isn't: Windows isn't stable at all, third party drivers or not. I've never had a Windows PC that I would describe as stable, including the preconfigured laptops and towers I've had. They all bluescreen and crash or freeze more or less regularly (but stability isn't what I care about when I run Windows).

[-] ProtonBadger@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

It was not a joke, I've worked on Windows and Linux for decades and I've worked on Symbian OS and Android as an OS engineer. With the right hardware and stable drivers neither crash. Anecdotally (which admittedly proves nothing) my gaming PC's only ever crashed because I had bad RAM, which i diagnosed with memtest86.

It's not the operating system. This is the weakness of Windows/Linux - the many many vendors of PC components and badly written drivers. It's not the operating system's fault as such, unless you count the OS' fault for not running a microkernel with drivers in a less privileged ring like Symbian OS did.

Now, the UI freezing and having weird random slowdown that's another thing and one of the reasons I prefer Linux. I'm very grateful for Valve/Proton that I have been able to ditch Windows completely now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sep@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Debian. Been running debian stable on 99% of my servers at work. And debian testing on the desktop, and daily driver. What orginally made me switch from redhat 7 was how frequent i ran into rpm hell, and how difficult it was to do an inplace upgrade. When i could just dist-upgrad to debian woody and everything worked, with a few well documented tweaks, I was sold. And have been running Debian on everything since 2002 ish.
It is stable, reliable, and dependable for the most critical applications. Truly the universal operating system for me.

Edit: forgot to mention that on the 3 desktop machines i prefer KDE. It looks and acts most similar to amiga os, that i grew up with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kratoz29@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

macOS and I like that despite how closed it is you can find new features, commands, apps and cool facts any day, I am gonna start to log all the good shit it has because my brain can't keep up LMAO.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Debian 12 just overtook Fedora for me after the Red Hat debauchery. With podman/distrobox/qemu/flatpak installed I really don't need my base OS to constantly be the latest and greatest. And I sure love that debian is community run and has taken the step to include non free software.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PlexSheep@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

Debian 12 runs all my servers. It's like the pinnacle of stability.

[-] emi@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My answer isn’t unique, but Arch linux is just my favorite to use. I just really love the ability to assemble things exactly the way I like them during the installation process.

I also really like the idea of a rolling release distro, meaning no major upgrades. I just run pacman -Syu once a day and things have been great.

Lastly, almost any piece of software I could want is available in the official repositories or the AUR, and it’s super convenient to be able to install things right away from the command line.

Editing to add: My work laptop is a MacBook Pro and I love it. macOS is really pleasant to use and anyone who says it’s not is a liar. Apple’s user experience game is on point

[-] Nioxic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I use windows because what i do most is gaming and just browsing. Gaming is just easiest on my windows pc

But i use a mac for school and i run linux on my gaming pc, because i put it on my sons pc.

I prefer windows because i just know it. Been using it for decades. So its easier for me.

But linux and macOS arent bad. They are just different.

MacOS is a bit annoying though. And a lot of apps for it has a subscription.. lol

[-] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

Debian Linux on the server: all the flexibility I need in a server OS.

macOS on the desktop: it just gets out of the way and lets me do my job

Windows. Everything is straight forward and I can still make some custom or niche stuff work.

I don't like Linux, because a lot of programs don't work, and I don't want to create my own 3D application or DAW from scratch. Not worth my time.

I don't like Apple because the money I'd put into that I'd rather put to better use.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Loki@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Whatever the fuck my brain runs. It's done a pretty okay job keeping me alive, and that's worth something, right?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I don’t have a favorite, use the best tool for the job.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Linux Mint. Just works. Zero hassle. Zero shitfuckery.

[-] shapis@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Paranoid Android back in the android 4/5 days slapped hard.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Debian 11 for my personal server, openSUSE tumbleweed for my personal use. Debian for stability and openSUSE for the latest and greatest of KDE plasma desktop environment!

[-] iusearchbtw@iusearchlinux.fyi 8 points 1 year ago

If you did not recommend arch, you basically recommended poop on a stick

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 8 points 1 year ago

I used to use windows but recently I installed Linux Mint to see how Linux works and to get more performance for gaming from my thinkpad.

[-] hondaguy97386@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Been daily driving Pop OS with the Xanmod kernel for a couple years. Love it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] davefischer@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I've been using Unix in one form or another since the mid 80s, so that's pretty deeply ingrained by now.

I was strongly biased towards Solaris & OpenBSD for many years (Solaris on nice Sun hardware, OpenBSD on small machines) but both began to annoy me a little bit recently, so I switched to Void linux. (Also, there was ONE feature of Linux that I REALLY wanted - extended attributes (name=val) in the filesystem. Love those.)

I'm fascinated by Multics & Control Data's NOS (70s mainframe OS's), but that's for historic study, not actual use.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] viridian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Will I get jumped if I say MacOS?

I'm just kidding, but I do like MacOS. I just find it more aesthetically pleasing than Windows and I find it easier to use and longer lasting than Windows. Like, I had to use my 2014 MacBook Air with 4GB of RAM for a week because I needed to repair my main Mac. Yes, it was slow, I couldn't have too many apps running at the same time, and I couldn't have my customary 20 tabs open, but it was certainly usable and not too frustrating.

Linux by far because of the customisation abilities it offers

[-] monotrox@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

Currently running fedora, because it is stable, easy to use and just works. Also, gnome is imo the best designed major, full-featured desktop environment that exists out there (even including windows or macos).

You might get a more tailored experience with window managers but im currently to lazy to set that up. I did use dwm for a time though, but it wasnt really flexible enough for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I'm glad you asked. How much time do you have?

[-] zeusbottom@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Love how most of the responses are different distros of Linux.

1998:

Me: I’d rather be running Linux

Systems Manager: Linux is a day late and a dollar short. Novell is the future. Microsoft might be interesting too.

She went off to teach community college after she got laid off.

[-] zombie_kong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Windows. Because I can run WSL alongside the industry standard business tools such as Outlook etc.

It’s the best of both worlds for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kissaki@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Linux.

But of course I need a desktop UI too so that alone isn't enough. I don't have a favorite though.

Windows has a decent core and good core UI, but makes it awful with win11 UI and product pushing. I'm being pragmatic, not enthusiastic, using it.

Ubuntu has or had PPA for selective more direct and up to date software, but I guess with the newer package distribution formats (flatpak and the others) I guess that's not necessary or a comparative upside anymore.

The UIs I tried or used on Linux I never really liked. It was reasonable or acceptable at most. I wonder if there's one I'd like out there.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
164 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43908 readers
981 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS