74
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by tomatoely@sh.itjust.works to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

As Google tries to hinder ad-block extensions with their new platform Manifest V3, it seems to me Chrome or any Chromium derivatives are no longer a viable way to browse the web safely. So it got me wondering, how much big of a task would it be to still suport Manifest V2 on newer releases of Chromium? Maybe implement some legacy option for backwards compatibility with older extensions. I think it would be a great alternative to have, but I haven't seen anyone coming up with something similar.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 63 points 2 months ago
[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Remind me: who provides most of the funding that FF has?

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 32 points 2 months ago

that only reinforces that you should use firefox… forcing google to pay more money to mozilla and giving mozilla more power to negotiate is a good thing

sure google has some power over them with the money they give, but by using chromium that power is absolute - no need to pay, ask, influence when you just get

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Your point?

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

And what do you do when Firefox deprecates v2 too?

[-] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago

If it does, we can worry about it then, but at present there's no reason for them to do so. Chrome is deprecating v2 because it conflicts with their advertising mandate. Firefox's goals are vastly different.

[-] CondorWonder@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 months ago

Right now - easy, with the difficulty going up over time as the main Chromium codebase continues to change (and especially as it gets security updates). I think I’ve read that some variants (Brave?) have committed to supporting ManifestV2 for as long as possible, for instance with their own fork.

[-] Fake4000@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

For a year, but it will be extremely difficult for them to maintain mv2 after jun 2025.

[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago

Why that date specifically?

[-] Fake4000@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago
[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

Thank you for the clarification

[-] Shamot@jlai.lu 33 points 2 months ago

I think that using gecko based browsers like Firefox is the best thing to do in the short term. But having no competition is a bad thing. So supporting new web engines, like Ladybird, is important too: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 8 points 2 months ago

yes and no… competition is good, but we do already have blink, webkit, and gecko… browser engines are biiiiig, complex beasts, and we do have competition already… more competition, at some point, becomes redundant

[-] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Don't think so, competition is good most of the time. Since Mozilla can be criticize with their browser and do not have the best engine, it could be good to have something else to compete with

[-] DWolf_19@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago
[-] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

If I recall correctly, some Chromium browsers will continue to support Manifest V2. For example, Brave and Vivaldi, if I'm not mistaken.

[-] eruchitanda@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but their adblockers are built in ones.

Those are not store extensions.

[-] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Why does it matter? You can always install the one you want.

[-] s12@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

Disabling Manifest V2 will break a lot of extensions apparently.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Can they be disabled?

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
74 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

30827 readers
453 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS