1108
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
  • Google is transitioning Chrome's extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the V3.
  • This means users won't be able to use uBlock Origin to block ads on Google Chrome.
  • However, there's a new iteration of the app — uBlock Origin Lite, which is Manifest V3 compliant but doesn't boast the original version's comprehensive ad-blocking features.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 569 points 3 months ago

I'd just like to reassure everybody that you can quit using Google Chrome. I switched to Firefox a year ago. You can switch to something else too. Give it a try.

Wait, I don't need to nudge anybody. After all the ads start invading their browsing experience I doubt anybody will need much prodding.

[-] echo@lemmings.world 83 points 3 months ago

Yep... when ublock quits working for me on Chrome then I will migrate.

[-] Maestro@fedia.io 293 points 3 months ago

Why wait? Migrate now. There's even Firefox for mobile with ublock

[-] chazwhiz@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago
[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 54 points 3 months ago

On Android, Firefox for iOS doesn't have addons because Apple.

[-] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago

The Orion browser has rudimentary support for Firefox extensions. UBlock origin seems to work for me. Best I’ve found for iOS

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Only on Firefox Android.

As far as I know, Safari is the only browser with Adblock on iOS.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 months ago

Also third party browsers on iOS are forced to use a janky slow WebKit WebView instead of the accelerated WebKit on Safari.

In the EU, things are different and third-party rendering engines have been forced upon Apple, so people there may have more options.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 20 points 3 months ago

Rocking Firefox even from my Android phone. It works great!

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] megabat@lemm.ee 216 points 3 months ago

I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that even the United States FBI recommended using ad blocking extensions to protect yourself online.

https://www.ic3.gov/Media/Y2022/PSA221221

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 175 points 3 months ago
[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 117 points 3 months ago

Susceptible to intrusive ads and viruses.

My Windows computer was infected more than once by virus spreading ads on legitimate websites. The site owners denied any responsibility for the viruses saying it was the fault and responsibility of the ad companies. Never again.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 41 points 3 months ago

The site owners are correct. And if the ad companies can't be bothered to vet their ads, I can't be bothered to look at them.

[-] ngwoo@lemmy.world 68 points 3 months ago

Use Firefox. If something you use ABSOLUTELY needs Chromium yell at whoever makes the thing. If that still doesn't work use Brave. But then go back to Firefox for everything else.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] finickydesert@lemmy.ml 67 points 3 months ago

Even the FBI sent a warning imploring everyone use AdBlockers

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 60 points 3 months ago

FYI TELL YOUR LOVED ONES ABOUT THIS

If you are on here you're probably like me "the it guy of the family"

Mom and dad aren't going to switch themselves, remove chrome for them as the default install Firefox and tell them to use that unless something absolutely refuses to work. Pick your battles.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago

If you're still using chrome at this point you're just asking for this shit

[-] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Intrusive ads and...

MALWARE!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] vanderbilt@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago

Hopefully the DoJ case against Google includes getting bent over a barrel for abusing their position as a market maker to force their revenue model.

[-] mindlight@lemm.ee 43 points 3 months ago

If you want to avoid ads it might be a good idea to not use products from a company which primary goal is to make money on ads...

But hey, what do I know...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

I have said this in other threads about this issue in response to all the "use Firefox" comments.

Thousands upon thousands of school children are currently using Chromebooks they get from their schools. Now they will be forced to look at ads.

[-] CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago

Now they will be forced to look at ads.

I'm pretty sure they would've been seeing ads anyways. I doubt that school IT administrators had uBlock Origins as an extension that was being installed and I really doubt they didn't have the chromebooks locked down so students could install whatever extensions they wanted.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago

They're forced to look at ads anyway, as the IT dept blocks installing extensions

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

Next week: Over 30 million users pull the plug on Chrome, leaving Google execs to make the surprised Pikachu face and wonder aloud why millennials hate web browsers.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

"always do evil" ~Google

[-] Kethal@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

I used Firefox when it first came out. Google and Mozzila got into a hot race to make the best browser and they both did well. Somehow I ended up using Chrome a lot more even though I thought that by the time the race ended they were pretty even. Both were very fast and had great plugin libraries. Chrome looked nicer out of the box, but Firefox is highly customizable. Since the end of that race, Chrome has gotten worse and Firefox is about the same. I've switched back fully to Firefox, and the only thing I miss is the "Piss off publisher frames" plugin, that I haven't found a replacement for. It's a nice browser.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 29 points 3 months ago

Skill issue

[-] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 3 months ago

Not trying to troll or anything, but what can Chrome do that Firefox cannot?

I've always felt like Firefox has more useful features like screenshotting, etc.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Even if it didn't have superior functionality, I'd still support & use firefox over chrome just because I don't care how fast the sports car is: if it's not going where I tell it to, I ain't gettin' in.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] echo@lemmings.world 26 points 3 months ago

uBlock Origin Lite, which is Manifest V3 compliant but doesn’t boast the original version’s comprehensive ad-blocking features.

Then what is the purpose/value of it?

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 64 points 3 months ago

Its able to block some ads. However, from a security perspective this basically means google chrome is no longer a web browser that should be used in a professional setting, let alone for your private and personal work

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mwa@thelemmy.club 25 points 3 months ago

Stop making you extensions/site only work on chromium based browsers

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 3 months ago

All the webdev companies' across the planet at their sprint planning in a few weeks: "So, shit, we finally need to support Firefox correctly."

[-] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago

Just imported all my stuff into firefox. Bye felicia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Just finished migrating to Firefox this year to prep for this. See Ya later Chrome! Give my regards to Netscape.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yournamehere@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago

oh no.

anyway, have you heard about firefox,librefox,mulvad browser...

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 18 points 3 months ago

This is as good a place as any to challenge firefox users: what are you doing to support the project?

Using their software doesn't support them, unless you search with Google and I doubt many users reading this do.

Mozilla may be deserving of criticism, but criticism alone does not support them.

I fear that one day we will lose firefox.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What's even worse is every time someone mentions Firefox, some chucklefuck has to go hardcore negative on everything Mozilla does that is 1/10th as shitty as Google. Just shut your piehole if you don't like the only somewhat private open source browser.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1108 points (100.0% liked)

News

23287 readers
3220 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS