510

Leaders are perhaps experiencing more resistance than they had anticipated.

Amazon is perhaps the most documented example of how ugly the RTO battle can get: Around 30,000 employees signed a petition protesting the company’s in-office mandate, and more than 1,800 pledged to walk out from their jobs to take a stand.

The tech giant is still complaining that workers are dodging the three-day in-office mandate, over a year after it was announced.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 130 points 2 months ago

My job originally encouraged it. But we collectively ignored it. They tried to threaten us by saying, "We track your badges" and people laughing. Like, you really want to fire your best employees for that? I double dog dare you you POS.

There was even a brown nosing department lead who tried to bully people like, "I'm at the office, unlike X". And now we all say, "We come on days when you're not there."

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago

I love it that the norms are shifting. Can't let the asskissers win.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 70 points 2 months ago

My previous company conducted a six week experiment in late 2022 having everyone come to the office twice per week. They compared the metrics and saw that it didn't make a difference in productivity, told everyone they could wfh unless they needed to grab supplies, and rented a smaller office. We cut the space to around a third of what we used to have. In 2019, the owner was considering doubling our space. Some get it, some don't.

[-] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago

My company reduced office space as well. This nailed the new 2-days office rule. They cannot roll it back

[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 95 points 2 months ago

One time I worked for a small company (300ish employees) that was well known locally for being heavy handed and micromanaging. I have never before or since seen so much intentional time wasting by so many people in one place.

Turns out if you micromanage your workforce and are constantly slapping their hands for not appearing to be busy enough, you'll successfully create a bunch of actors who should get Emmys for playing the part of "productive" employees.

On the other hand, if you treat them well, give them the tools to do their jobs, and leave them alone most people will actually do their jobs quite well. Shocking, I know.

[-] uranibaba@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

small company (300ish employees)

I work for a miniscule company, four employees and the owner.

[-] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

I can't believe you work for Five Guys!

[-] uranibaba@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I'm included in the calculation, so I AM (one of) Five Guys!

[-] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago

Because companies are planning to increase hiring soon. The fed is going to cut the interest rate, spurring growth. RTO was just about making employees quit to avoid severance payouts and other layoff perks back when the economy was more slumped.

[-] huginn@feddit.it 22 points 2 months ago

(it was also about commercial real estate values taking a land dive but otherwise spot on)

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

This is the only correct answer

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 months ago

What about "we have this massive office and only 3 people use it" and "we want to micro manage our employees"

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

The complex interplay of macro and micro

[-] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

There's some of that. I know companies in my city were given tax breaks for hosting their office building there. The theory is, the business brings more people into the area who will be spending money on lunch/happy hour/gas/etc. The tax income of that is more than the tax benefit they offer the company.

Well, people stop coming to the office, and their tax benefit of the employees being in the city dries up. The city was threatening the companies tax benefit if the people didn't come back, and thus, RTO (in my city, anyway).

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Never thought about that angle, makes sense though

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I agree that those were side benefits of RTO, but it's only stopping because they are planning to start buying up and hoarding tech workers again when the interest rate drops.

[-] ARk@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Why would they make employees quit when they are just going to hire again? Weeding out the job hoppers?

[-] ready_for_qa@programming.dev 15 points 2 months ago

It's like when you cancel your Netflix when money is tight and then resub once you can afford it again.

We are just labor subscriptions for corporations.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

First you cut the costs and get a bonus for that, then you fill the empty roles, and then get a bonus for that

[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Quarterly profits were down. Next quarter is irrelevant.

[-] ofcourse@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Because a lot of CEOs these days only care about quarterly reports. When interest rates went up, companies cost to do business also went up, so to keep the red profit line going up, they had to cut costs somewhere. Labor makes up most of the expenses so layoffs and forced RTO happened.

These CEOs don’t care that they lose years of experience when employees leave. And by the time the lack of experience catches up to the companies shitting themselves, the CEOs hope to have moved on to something else with their massive stock rewards for “increasing shareholder value”. Even the Boeing CEO who wasn’t lucky enough to leave before shit hit the fan is going to get a golden parachute. So really no downside for them.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

The computer did that auto-layoff thing.

[-] nobleshift@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The office is now full of unhappy underperforming employees and firms are looking for people to replace the talent that bailed when the RTO became mandatory. All of the top people I know are remote except a couple who need the structure to perform at that level. Everyone else won't be coming back so good luck with all that.

[-] the_radness@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

There are only 3 reasons employers force RTO: control, real estate, impending RIFs.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago
[-] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Reduction In Force. I e. Layoffs

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

An investment vehicle. Reserved Investor Fund

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

"KPMG surveyed U.S. CEOs of companies turning over at least $500 million and found that just one-third expect a full return to the office in the next three years.

It’s a complete 360 from their stance last year, when 62% of CEOs surveyed predicted that working from home would end by 2026."

180. 180 you stupid spaghetti slurping cretin.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Reminds me of a joke from the early days of the Sony/MS console wars:

You know why they call it the Xbox 360? Because when you see it you turn 360 degrees and walk away (or moonwalk away)

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Man it's been a minute since I've thought about that movie.

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It's criminally forgotten despite having a rare balance of interesting plot balanced with great action and solid special effects. Had the child lead been someone famous it would have stuck around longer. A classic in my book, up there with True Lies, T2, and Predator as Arnolds enduring movies.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 32 points 2 months ago

I love how Fortune ignores their previous reporting. We all know that RTO was largely about control and a sunk cost in property. It still is. Companies switch between RTO and WFH whenever they want to restructure. Efficiency is the argument, but that's not the goal. Fortune staff know this, but they're writing for the bosses, so they feign ignorance. Meh.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

Also Fortune is ignoring the serious damage done to the health of many industries by arbitarily hurtig workers and forcing them off of career paths for no fucking reason.

Fuck MBA rich asshats, people need to stop putting them in charge of things they dont know shit.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 26 points 2 months ago

offices cost money. companies that are smart would keep small offices in major cities to entertain clients/customers and act as a space staff who wants to use it can. Like if their electricity goes out or just prefer to go someplace besides home. locate downtown or near the airports

[-] vithigar@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Exactly what my employer did during the pandemic. Hired more people and reduced the amount of leased office space. Would be impossible to call us back into office now because we simply wouldn't all fit.

No sign of that changing either. They announced just last week that they're letting the lease on a large chunk of our remaining offices lapse next year, and have already sub-leased out about half of that. We're fully remote for good at this point.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 months ago

same here. had a name for it that was sorta like work where you want to but realistically only a slice of the company could actually work from an office. I mean just on population it would make sense to do like NY, LA, chicago, and then either houston or dallas.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

I end up getting in late and leaving early on the days I'm in office and yet somehow I still get good reviews. That should be impossible according to c-level execs that are never in office, come and go as they please, and hold these thrice-rescheduled-hastily-engineered all hands meetings where there are never updates to the things they say they're working on. They just say they've put a large group of middle-management on it right before they introduce yet another half-assed convoluted system to measure employee producivity that they don't even understand. Gotta fire some people because the plan the execs heard about on a retreat didn't work at all and they lost a bunch of money so they need cash to build that AI in order to fire more people!

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Sure ... now that they've pumped and dumped their office real estate holdings.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Some companies are desginating some cities as "hub cities". If you're full time remote and can't relocate or go to an office in a hub city, they let you go.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
510 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

9937 readers
733 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS