99
submitted 5 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Insufficiently ruinous Eco terrorism

[-] Frittiert@feddit.org 10 points 5 months ago
[-] darth_grunkus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Where is Captain Planet when we need him?

[-] Iz_OK@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

If you ever want to feel disgusted head over to Google Earth and check out Midland, Texas. Every square you see is an oil pad.

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

All must be sacrificed to the parasite class's cult of Big Number Always Goes Up.

[-] Atsur@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago
[-] kalkulat@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Because you can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time ... and they've been at it for a very long time.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 5 months ago

They don't need to invest in new production any more, so that capital investment money is now pure profit.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 months ago

Sadly, they are in fact investing in new production.

[-] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Andres Malm suggests in his book "Fossil Capital" that part of the reason that fossil fuels (stocks of energy) are so profitable is that you can pick and choose when to extract and then again when to release the energy stored in them, which will always be more profitable than, for instance, wind and solar (flows of energy) because you can manipulate production to prevent over supply, and choose when to release energy instead of waiting for the energy to be available in the flow. The higher capability to profit means that they will remain more profitable than renewables long after any other sort of calculation other than "profitability" would favor the renewables (cost to produce, damage to the environment, ability to satisfy energy demand).

[-] alienghic@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago

I blame the young earth creationist christians who think that humans are incapable of destroying gods creation, and that the increasing planetary instability means that god will return and put them in charge any day now.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

I blame them too, but bigger blame adheres to those who own the fossil-fuel companies, and to the politicians who let the fissil-fuel owners buy them off.

[-] alienghic@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago

There's some weird links between american christianity and oil. At the very least a bunch of the people who got rich off of oil also tended to be devout christians, and used their money to support evangelizing christianity and oil dominance.

There's a number of different reviews for "Anointed With Oil: How Christianity and Crude Made Modern America"

This is an especially detailed one. https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/kim-phillips-fein-anointed-oil/

I found the book and it's reviews after noticing just how biased toward the republicans the owners of the oil companies tended to be. Other large businesses tend to play both sides in politics, but the owners of the oil companies really seem to be really into the traditional gender hierarchies.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

We see a bunch of things happening. First of all the West attacked and keeps attacking Russias oil production and exports with sanctions, due to Russias invasion of Ukraine. That means we actually have one of the biggest oil producers and exporters being taken out of the game. Something similar happened with Venezuela and Iran previously. So we actually see declines, just not choose by the countries themself, but mainly by the US, to keep out competition. At the same time 2023 oil consumption is 1.7% above 2019 oil consumption. The pandemic had a massiv effect on the industry and a lot of production is being restarted. However we also see EVs starting to have an impact. There are also a lot of other pushes mainly by net oil importers to reduce oil consumption. This seems to start to actually hurt the industry.

If I had to guess, we probably see the next reduction in oil production in the Middle East. Not due to the governments wanting to produce less oil, but due to a war in the region.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
99 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5452 readers
174 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS