518
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 122 points 3 months ago

So if we perceive a fetus as a person, self defense laws and stand your ground laws should apply right?

Like, if the threat is persistent and reasonably considered to be causing bodily harm, then reasonable escalating force, up to lethal, should be legal correct? Intent and innocence of the perps intentions does not absolve them in court of law... So if we consider the fetus a person and they are causing harm without stopping when prompted the mother should be legally afforded to defend herself, no?

[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 43 points 3 months ago

This is the truth. Not even a full grown person, not even your just-born child, no one can compel you to give your blood to save their life much less to keep them alive inside your own body for nine months.

If they think a fetus has the same right to life as any person, they are free to help it survive using their own resources, just get it the fuck out of my body first.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

That is a creative usage of the law. I like it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml 98 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So I can drive in the HOV lane, I can't be mass arrested, and attempted murder against me is considered attempted genocide?

My tax return is going to be enormous due to how many dependants I have. I'll have enough money to get TF out of this crazy place.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

What they'd really hate is not being able to jail pregnant women because the fetus is innocent

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

Just wait until Texas rules that the fetus was an accomplice, and gives a pregnant woman a double sentence.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Pregnant women kills an abusive husband and Texas tries the mother and fetus for murder...

It's less funny when you think about how they probably wouldn't blink

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

All the college kids get to start legally drinking nine months earlier! And legal weed too!

[-] ZhaoYadang@lemmy.world 93 points 3 months ago

“Fetal personhood” was always the next shoe to drop after they overturned Roe. I was a little surprised the court didn’t go straight there in Dodd.

All that shit the court said about the states being able to decide about abortion? Lies. These right-wing nutcases are out to ban abortion everywhere. And they will, through fetal personhood. We can’t pass a law to kill a PERSON without due process, can we?

It’ll happen in the next five years unless we reform the court or impeach the six frauds. Based on our current tendency to go from bad to worse, I doubt either of those will happen.

Emigrate now if you can.

[-] Trubble@startrek.website 41 points 3 months ago

How? Where? None of us have money saved anymore. Groceries and rent have made sure we can't save any money for anything.

...Unless, there is an adopt an American family movement I haven't heard of? Can we start one?!

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm Sally Struthers, and I'm here to talk to you about the reality of life here in the nation of America. This is a photo of Timmy. Timmy is a 28 year old middle-manager at a large box store. With just $400 a week Timmy can finally afford the new master cylinder in his 2006 Camry and get a new used iPhone 8.

Please give today.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not the only next step. They are also looking to ban contraceptives. IUDs will be up first because some believe life begins at fertilization.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 87 points 3 months ago

Being a person doesn't give them the right to someone else's body to survive.

Unless we're legalizing forced blood, liver, marrow, and kidney donation?

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

It would be morbidly funny for a woman to sue a fetus for sexual assault for penetrating them without consent.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 58 points 3 months ago

So if fetuses are declared people will Republicans start ignoring them like they do children?

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 3 months ago

The answer to that question, is yes. Republicans will immediately will stop giving a shit. Which is impressive as they barely care about fetuses now expect for a way to control women.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 55 points 3 months ago

So they count as dependents on taxes, require child support, and allow the mother to drive in the carpool lane?

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

I was thinking fetal life insurance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago

If a fetus kills you, do they get tried as a minor?

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Manslaughter, they don't have intent.

[-] phorq@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is the plot of Baby Driver, right?

Edit: I'm stupid, I was thinking of Fetus Driver

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago

I have about a million pre-people in this tissue. Can I get a tax break?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Every time you masturbate, ~~God kills a kitten~~ you go to prison for mass murder.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 19 points 3 months ago

Fucking mega-Hitler over here asking for a donation.

How do you live with yourself for killing so many millions of people of young age?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Officer: Are you pregnant ma'am?

Ma'am: No there's a homeless person who is living rent free inside my womb against my will.

Officer: Stand back maam!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

But are fetuses corporations? If a small business incubator fails, is it an abortion?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 months ago

Careful of what you wish for. I look forward to a future court case that establishes once and for all the definition of a person. Although, with the current Supreme Court, I do admit some hesitation.

I mean, if you want to establish rights for a fetus, what do you do when that fetus belongs to a “Mexican”? What do you do if a pregnant American moves to another country without the permission of the fetus? Not to say these are legit examples, but the courts will fill with bizarre cases like this.

More interestingly, what do you do when science stands up in court and establishes a fact that opposes your belief? Your beliefs have gotten you this far. It’s very plausible that you will lose some of the ground you’ve gained.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

It makes me wonder, why are the religious obsess with abortion when the US allows divorce, even though the Bible forbids it? Why not campaign on striking down divorce as well?

[-] DLSantini@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 months ago

Pretty soon they'll be trying to put me in prison for mass-murder every time I jerk off.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

Would not surprise me if these same people then try to legalize pedophilia if they win just so they can do everything in their power to legally fuck a fetus. I imagine that's their ultimate goal in life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MrTomS@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Come census time there will be pregnancy tests?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
518 points (100.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
2998 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS