628
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 237 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I firmly believe that if any other candidate, in a primary or general election, either republican or democrat, had said this, it would end their campaign.

We have become so accustomed to Trump saying outrageous bullshit, that this will be forgotten in less than a week, and most voters will never even hear about it.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 77 points 3 months ago

Trump has steadily pushed the limit of what a politician can get away with for years. He is a master bullshiter devoid of any moral capacity to feel shame and bullshited his way through everything. No low will ever be too low for him.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

He is the water, the world is the frog

[-] toast@retrolemmy.com 40 points 3 months ago

I'm not sure why the senate shouldn't subpoena him, and have him appear before them to explain just what he means by this. He wouldn't show, of course, and end up in contempt of congress. Of course, this would make him even more popular with his cult, but we already know who they'll vote for.

Really, he keeps doing shit that would get anyone else arrested. It's time to arrest him.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Nah, don't even give him a platform. Let him fade away into our terrible history.

[-] toast@retrolemmy.com 32 points 3 months ago

He has a platform. He needs repercussions.

[-] pubquiz@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

So wrong. Confront bullies. never appease!!

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 23 points 3 months ago

It's easily forgotten because he'll say something new and outrageous again next week. Even his voters don't know what he intends to do. They just get caught up in whatever word salad they attach to. In reality, he will probably not do a fraction of the bullshit that he spews as promises. He has never kept a promise in his life anyway. He's not starting now.

Last time he was president all he did was golfing while letting bad guys run wild. He's enabling "chaotic evil" by being an idiot.

For instance, the pathetic half-assed wall didn't solve the immigration issue at all. The real evil were the stooges organising ICE to encage children.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 14 points 3 months ago

all he did was golfing while letting bad guys run wild

there was also that time when he tried to stage a coup

[-] TheFlopster@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Other people organized, staged, and enacted that coup. When he realized it was happening, he decided the coup stagers were "loyal" to him, so he was on board from that point on.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The way it works is that when some kind of scandal is unveiled (like project 2025 in this case) he goes with it openly.

His base hears it and take it that he is just "playing libs and doesn't really mean it, and even if it does it wouldn't be a bad idea"

His base is clearly hopeless, but hopefully it won't affect independents.

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Within a matter of hours there was already a swarm of apologists going "here's what he actually meant".

[-] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

And in the same breath "I like him because he says what he thinks".

[-] missingno@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

He really could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and his voters would love him for it.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 3 months ago

Please take this to heart, magas.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

I'm worried that they will.

[-] palordrolap@kbin.run 18 points 3 months ago

At the risk of flogging an already well-flogged dead horse, MAGAts don't care what he says as long as it upsets people they don't like.

And when those ideologies come back to bite them, they'll blame those same disliked people for either causing it or not stopping it, because neither they nor their preferred politician(s) could possibly be to blame for it.

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Our biggest mistake will be never addressing these people's bullshit. I mean it's not like they can be punished but allowing it to go on with no remedy leaves us all exposed.

[-] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

People often segregate themselves into bubbles separated from others they oppose. I can say since the political affiliation is known from past elections, that has become a stronger factor when I am deliberating on which places I would want to live. I'm sure this is adding to the polarization, where people are gravitating to communities that more often reinforce their beliefs and give them fewer opportunities to challenge them.

How can we counter this polarizing force?

I'm not sure but I'd like to have some ideas. This is one of those questions that is reason for academia. It deserves study and research. Now funding that research may be impossible because it doesn't serve the oligarchy but you know, that's why we fight.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

This is what MAGAs genuinely want.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

They believe the lie that a bunch of dead people and illegal immigrants are voting and tipping the scales for the left. When they hear “fixed” they think Trump is going to stop that fake problem from happening.

This is something if a Democrat had said both sides would have their head on a pike. Teflon dons existence is a testimony to how awful people are.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

Hell if a Republican who wasn't him had said it, he'd be fucking crucified.

[-] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I assumed at first it was a satyrical journal like the Onion and read it in that optic. Then I saw the comments and thought a few people had missed the joke and were taking it seriously. Then started doubting, checked what type of paper it was and if other known ones (like nytime) also talked about it...

This is real, fellas. He really did say that.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Gotta steal the news headlines somehow I guess.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

And people still calling P2025 a big joke.

It reminds me of the movie Mars Attacks when the aliens kept saying “we come in peace!”, and laughing as they were blasting everyone.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Only a few steps away from "you don't get to vote".

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

Vance said he wants only people with kids to be able to vote. And they will be able to vote on behalf of their children until they can vote for themselves. These people are something else.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

These people are something else.

Fascists.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

It'll be like elections in Russia. Somehow, Putin always wins with 80-90% of the vote.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

We know Trump, you want to illegalize elections and have life time appointments for President.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

isnt that common knowledge? he just said the quiet part out loud now.

he would have to eventually, to manufacture peoples consent.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, I agree with him. His supporters should not vote anytime in the future. Just stay home.

[-] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 6 points 3 months ago

Maga family is saying it means something else, according to pundit.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Trump ONLY says what he Means! And what he Means is ALWAYS a Riddle to Pwn the Libtards! He's a JEENYUS!

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

What are they saying it means

[-] abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

They're saying that allegedly, Christians are not big on voting, and this statement is meant to encourage those non voters to come vote just this once and everything will get better. Then you can go back to being a non voter.

I think.

Horrible wording no matter how you slice it, though.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 4 points 3 months ago

Is he baiting by saying that by next election america will be in such good shape that both choices will be good? Or is he seriously dogwhistling for the pro-dictator crowd?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

When a politician says they are going to be a dictator, believe them.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

It isn't dogwhistling. He's just coming right out and saying it.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 2 points 3 months ago

I mean I think it's important to analyze his plausible deniability tactics. He didn't literally say, "I will cancel the 2028 elections", he made a vague threat that "you won't have to vote".

We need to shut these arguments down because Fox will definitely use them to defend Trump and normalize authoritarian policies.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
628 points (100.0% liked)

News

23296 readers
3139 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS